Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I probably should have looked at my coverage, but at the time I was to distraught to even think about it. It probably didn't occur to the office staff because federal insurance covers "everything" when dealing with pregnancy. For example, I had some bleeding early on and all the ultrasounds were covered. In addition, theraputic abortions are covered in 90% of private insurance plans. Yes they should have been more vigilant, but honestly, the issue never occurred to anyone. I was my doctor's first case of anencephaly. I'm sure my doctor has done other theraputic abortions, most OB/GYN practices routinely do them as a matter of course. Theraputic abortions are a part of women's healthcare. That is the point, Congress is specifically excluding a necessary medical procedure from the healthcare bill.
From a policy standpoint, why is it ok for opponents to say "I don't want my tax dollars to go to fund anyone's abortion" and have Congress listen. When do I get to tell Congress that I don't want my tax dollars to go to things I find morally repugnant like Guantanamo and the war? Abortion is the only area singled out in funding restrictions this way and everyone just accepts that it is ok because some people have a moral problem with abortion.
some people? try most people. many of whom consider "abortion" to be murder. not what you had done, but we don't want to create any more loopholes. It sounds like your situation is a very fair exception, but let's not pretend that tens of millions of people have a very real problem with their tax dollars paying for abortion. Much more so than your other examples.