Russia the main suspect in causing brain injuries to US diplomats in Cuba and China

[Anonymous]

Wasn't the NYPD sued for using these weapons in 2017?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone noticed a lot of old threads are being revived all at once?

Horrifying news here. I believe the Russians are doing it. You’d think they’d work on their economy instead.

Did you read the Julia Iofe/GQ article on page 1? It was published on October 19,2020. The attacks are worse and the Trump administration is covering up the injuries to American diplomats. How is this an old thread?

The start of the thread was 2 years ago but the current events are obviously still relevant.

[Anonymous]

“C.I.A. officers visiting overseas stations also experienced similar symptoms… The officers were traveling to discuss countering Russia covert operations with foreign intelligence agencies, a fact that adds to suspicions that Moscow is behind the episodes.”

[Anonymous]

Anyone seen any sources on these claims?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen any sources on these claims?

Did you read the lengthy articles linked above?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen any sources on these claims?

Did you read the lengthy articles linked above?

Yes, that’s why as a careful reader it became clear to me that the sourcing is questionable, hence my interest.

[Anonymous]

Wow, how many acts of war are we going to allow Russia to inflict upon us?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow, how many acts of war are we going to allow Russia to inflict upon us?

As long as Trump is President, it seems as many as they want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen any sources on these claims?

Did you read the lengthy articles linked above?

Yes, that’s why as a careful reader it became clear to me that the sourcing is questionable, hence my interest.

What kind of source would satisfy you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen any sources on these claims?

Did you read the lengthy articles linked above?

Yes, that’s why as a careful reader it became clear to me that the sourcing is questionable, hence my interest.

What kind of source would satisfy you?

Published papers with methods. Off-the-record intel is super, super suspect, especially after the farcical Trump-Russia investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen any sources on these claims?

Did you read the lengthy articles linked above?

Yes, that’s why as a careful reader it became clear to me that the sourcing is questionable, hence my interest.

What kind of source would satisfy you?

Published papers with methods. Off-the-record intel is super, super suspect, especially after the farcical Trump-Russia investigation.

Cool story, Trump robot.

“Super, super.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen any sources on these claims?

Did you read the lengthy articles linked above?

Yes, that’s why as a careful reader it became clear to me that the sourcing is questionable, hence my interest.

What kind of source would satisfy you?

Published papers with methods. Off-the-record intel is super, super suspect, especially after the farcical Trump-Russia investigation.

Cool story, Trump robot.

“Super, super.”

PP is a pretty good reminder: propaganda works!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen any sources on these claims?

Did you read the lengthy articles linked above?

Yes, that’s why as a careful reader it became clear to me that the sourcing is questionable, hence my interest.

What kind of source would satisfy you?

Published papers with methods. Off-the-record intel is super, super suspect, especially after the farcical Trump-Russia investigation.

An published government study says that the mysterious head injuries suffered by US diplomatic staff in China and Cuba that had been described as "sonic attacks" are consistent with the use of directed microwave energy. A number of experts have weighed in and indicated that Russia has used these methods in the past and are the most likely to be using it now. Use your imagination as to why there’s no “published papers” officially blaming Russia for anything during this administration, which blamed Obama for Putin’s takeover of Crimea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen any sources on these claims?

Did you read the lengthy articles linked above?

Yes, that’s why as a careful reader it became clear to me that the sourcing is questionable, hence my interest.

What kind of source would satisfy you?

Published papers with methods. Off-the-record intel is super, super suspect, especially after the farcical Trump-Russia investigation.

An published government study says that the mysterious head injuries suffered by US diplomatic staff in China and Cuba that had been described as "sonic attacks" are consistent with the use of directed microwave energy. A number of experts have weighed in and indicated that Russia has used these methods in the past and are the most likely to be using it now. Use your imagination as to why there’s no “published papers” officially blaming Russia for anything during this administration, which blamed Obama for Putin’s takeover of Crimea.

I imagine you are parroting this study, which clearly a propagandist like you has not read.

https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25889/an-assessment-of-illness-in-us-government-employees-and-their-families-at-overseas-embassies

“Multiple hypotheses and mechanisms have been proposed to explain these clinical cases, but evidence has been lacking, no hypothesis has been proven, and the circumstances remain unclear.“

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone seen any sources on these claims?

Did you read the lengthy articles linked above?

Yes, that’s why as a careful reader it became clear to me that the sourcing is questionable, hence my interest.

What kind of source would satisfy you?

Published papers with methods. Off-the-record intel is super, super suspect, especially after the farcical Trump-Russia investigation.

An published government study says that the mysterious head injuries suffered by US diplomatic staff in China and Cuba that had been described as "sonic attacks" are consistent with the use of directed microwave energy. A number of experts have weighed in and indicated that Russia has used these methods in the past and are the most likely to be using it now. Use your imagination as to why there’s no “published papers” officially blaming Russia for anything during this administration, which blamed Obama for Putin’s takeover of Crimea.

I imagine you are parroting this study, which clearly a propagandist like you has not read.

https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25889/an-assessment-of-illness-in-us-government-employees-and-their-families-at-overseas-embassies

“Multiple hypotheses and mechanisms have been proposed to explain these clinical cases, but evidence has been lacking, no hypothesis has been proven, and the circumstances remain unclear.“

You missed the part where it said that “directed, pulsed radiofrequency energy” was “the most plausible mechanism” causing the injuries. Why don’t you just tell us what you think it is and who’s behind it?