JAMA study found a significant correlation between long term opioid use/ abuse and Trump voters

[Anonymous]

Obama spent $6T stabilizing the economy that the W administration left in shambles.

What is your excuse on the GOP tax cut?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/22/2016-trump-support-was-greatest-in-areas-with-highest-rates-of-painkiller-use-study-finds/?utm_term=.16dfb619a41e

Peer reviewed, prminant medical journal. So tell us Trumpkins, why do opioid addicts tend to support Trump? One thing is for certain, these are not our best people doing the clearest thinking.

???

I don't see why this is surprising.

While Obama was spending 6 cool trillions on who knows what, the opioid crises exploded, and he and his White House couldn't care less.

Just look at the statistics anyway you want, from use to overdoses. They are scary, and clearly skyrocket under Obama.

So, people and communities who have witnessed that, they chose to vote for change in 2016.

Why would you be surprised?

Btw, once thing that amazed me reading Hillary's What Happened is when she explained how she learned about the opiod crises during some campaign stop in 2016, when that's all that the local community I don't know where wanted to discuss.

Let that sink in for a minute or two.

Hillary, an Obama Cabinet Member and proud Policy Wonk, had no idea about the opioid crisis, the exploding death rates taking the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans, until she went on some campaign stop in 2016.

Which begs the obvious question, what were Obama and Hillary and that amazing White House "dream team" paying attention to?

Clearly not to American lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obama spent $6T stabilizing the economy that the W administration left in shambles.

What is your excuse on the GOP tax cut?

Please tell us, how exactly did Obama spend $6 trillion dollars, generating as much debt as ALL previous Presidents COMBINED?

I'm afraid you have no clue.

On the GOP tax cut, let's be fair and see how it plays, shall we?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I take this with a grain of salt. Opioid addicts aren’t known for being reliable voters.

It really doesn’t make sense.

So opioid addicts responded truthfully to a political survey? Suuuuuuuure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The opioid crisis is probably the biggest issue facing the country today, not illegals, not standing for the national anthem. What has this administration done about it? Nothing.

Actually, tons more than Obama’s. A task force was created and he’s dumping tons of money.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-combatting-opioid-crisis/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The opioid crisis is probably the biggest issue facing the country today, not illegals, not standing for the national anthem. What has this administration done about it? Nothing.

Actually, tons more than Obama’s. A task force was created and he’s dumping tons of money.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-combatting-opioid-crisis/

That's money down the drain and just PR.


He has KellyAnn Conway right on it. She and her staff have zero experience, but she has decided to not engage the agency that does have experience.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/06/kellyann...conway-opioid-drug-czar-325457

He also wants to remove mandatory substance abuse coverage from health insurance. This is the reason why the Trump Troubador is no longer a Trump fan.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-troubadour-l...th-care-feel/story?id=46371982

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/22/2016-trump-support-was-greatest-in-areas-with-highest-rates-of-painkiller-use-study-finds/?utm_term=.16dfb619a41e

Peer reviewed, prminant medical journal. So tell us Trumpkins, why do opioid addicts tend to support Trump? One thing is for certain, these are not our best people doing the clearest thinking.

???

I don't see why this is surprising.

While Obama was spending 6 cool trillions on who knows what, the opioid crises exploded, and he and his White House couldn't care less.

Just look at the statistics anyway you want, from use to overdoses. They are scary, and clearly skyrocket under Obama.

So, people and communities who have witnessed that, they chose to vote for change in 2016.

Why would you be surprised?

Btw, once thing that amazed me reading Hillary's What Happened is when she explained how she learned about the opiod crises during some campaign stop in 2016, when that's all that the local community I don't know where wanted to discuss.

Let that sink in for a minute or two.

Hillary, an Obama Cabinet Member and proud Policy Wonk, had no idea about the opioid crisis, the exploding death rates taking the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans, until she went on some campaign stop in 2016.

Which begs the obvious question, what were Obama and Hillary and that amazing White House "dream team" paying attention to?

Clearly not to American lives.

I bet that’s a totally accurate and non-biased take. I bet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Obama spent $6T stabilizing the economy that the W administration left in shambles.

What is your excuse on the GOP tax cut?

Please tell us, how exactly did Obama spend $6 trillion dollars, generating as much debt as ALL previous Presidents COMBINED?

I'm afraid you have no clue.

On the GOP tax cut, let's be fair and see how it plays, shall we?

Obama spent 6 trillion for 1.8 % GDP growth. We’re looking at 4 now. Thanks Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/22/2016-trump-support-was-greatest-in-areas-with-highest-rates-of-painkiller-use-study-finds/?utm_term=.16dfb619a41e

Peer reviewed, prminant medical journal. So tell us Trumpkins, why do opioid addicts tend to support Trump? One thing is for certain, these are not our best people doing the clearest thinking.

???

I don't see why this is surprising.

While Obama was spending 6 cool trillions on who knows what, the opioid crises exploded, and he and his White House couldn't care less.

Just look at the statistics anyway you want, from use to overdoses. They are scary, and clearly skyrocket under Obama.

So, people and communities who have witnessed that, they chose to vote for change in 2016.

Why would you be surprised?

Btw, once thing that amazed me reading Hillary's What Happened is when she explained how she learned about the opiod crises during some campaign stop in 2016, when that's all that the local community I don't know where wanted to discuss.

Let that sink in for a minute or two.

Hillary, an Obama Cabinet Member and proud Policy Wonk, had no idea about the opioid crisis, the exploding death rates taking the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans, until she went on some campaign stop in 2016.

Which begs the obvious question, what were Obama and Hillary and that amazing White House "dream team" paying attention to?

Clearly not to American lives.

I bet that’s a totally accurate and non-biased take. I bet.

Well, read the book, smarty pants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I take this with a grain of salt. Opioid addicts aren’t known for being reliable voters.

It really doesn’t make sense.

+1
Also, for whom do crack users tend to vote?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/22/2016-trump-support-was-greatest-in-areas-with-highest-rates-of-painkiller-use-study-finds/?utm_term=.16dfb619a41e

Peer reviewed, prminant medical journal. So tell us Trumpkins, why do opioid addicts tend to support Trump? One thing is for certain, these are not our best people doing the clearest thinking.

They don't even take care of their kids basic safety, every time there a published photo of an opioid user it's a person with an oily hair - they don't even take care of themselves....and they vote?

May be they support Trump when they come out of their drug coma, but I doubt that they vote.

Exactly what I was thinking. These people aren't voting. Neither are inner city crack users.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/22/2016-trump-support-was-greatest-in-areas-with-highest-rates-of-painkiller-use-study-finds/?utm_term=.16dfb619a41e

Peer reviewed, prminant medical journal. So tell us Trumpkins, why do opioid addicts tend to support Trump? One thing is for certain, these are not our best people doing the clearest thinking.

LMAO, Really? Peer reviewed?

How about these guys do a correlation between areas of highest rates of gang violence and party affiliation? Gee I wonder how well that turns out. Do we argue that gangs tend to support Democrats? Are gang members our best people and doing the clearest thinking?

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/22/2016-trump-support-was-greatest-in-areas-with-highest-rates-of-painkiller-use-study-finds/?utm_term=.16dfb619a41e

Peer reviewed, prminant medical journal. So tell us Trumpkins, why do opioid addicts tend to support Trump? One thing is for certain, these are not our best people doing the clearest thinking.

LMAO, Really? Peer reviewed?

How about these guys do a correlation between areas of highest rates of gang violence and party affiliation? Gee I wonder how well that turns out. Do we argue that gangs tend to support Democrats? Are gang members our best people and doing the clearest thinking?

Trumpkins are seriously dumb.

No, you're just seriously obtuse and can't stand it when someone makes a point you can't refute.
-DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/22/2016-trump-support-was-greatest-in-areas-with-highest-rates-of-painkiller-use-study-finds/?utm_term=.16dfb619a41e

Peer reviewed, prminant medical journal. So tell us Trumpkins, why do opioid addicts tend to support Trump? One thing is for certain, these are not our best people doing the clearest thinking.

LMAO, Really? Peer reviewed?

How about these guys do a correlation between areas of highest rates of gang violence and party affiliation? Gee I wonder how well that turns out. Do we argue that gangs tend to support Democrats? Are gang members our best people and doing the clearest thinking?

Trumpkins are seriously dumb.

+1

LOL. How many gang members are VOTING?

How many opioid addicts are VOTING, you moron??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/22/2016-trump-support-was-greatest-in-areas-with-highest-rates-of-painkiller-use-study-finds/?utm_term=.16dfb619a41e

Peer reviewed, prminant medical journal. So tell us Trumpkins, why do opioid addicts tend to support Trump? One thing is for certain, these are not our best people doing the clearest thinking.

???

I don't see why this is surprising.

While Obama was spending 6 cool trillions on who knows what, the opioid crises exploded, and he and his White House couldn't care less.

Just look at the statistics anyway you want, from use to overdoses. They are scary, and clearly skyrocket under Obama.

So, people and communities who have witnessed that, they chose to vote for change in 2016.

Why would you be surprised?

Btw, once thing that amazed me reading Hillary's What Happened is when she explained how she learned about the opiod crises during some campaign stop in 2016, when that's all that the local community I don't know where wanted to discuss.

Let that sink in for a minute or two.

Hillary, an Obama Cabinet Member and proud Policy Wonk, had no idea about the opioid crisis, the exploding death rates taking the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans, until she went on some campaign stop in 2016.

Which begs the obvious question, what were Obama and Hillary and that amazing White House "dream team" paying attention to?

Clearly not to American lives.

I bet that’s a totally accurate and non-biased take. I bet.

Yeah, just like all the totally accurate and non-biased liberal takes we have to read about daily.