Men Would You Date Her?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


Op here. I am a woman. I am not belittling anyone or making anything a bad thing. I was giving simple information which most posters would have asked her age and background.



Op here. As I mentioned on another response, she feels undateable because of her fertility issues. I do not agree that is a deal breaker but curious what men think. You sound like an annoying feminist.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


Op here. I am a woman. I am not belittling anyone or making anything a bad thing. I was giving simple information which most posters would have asked her age and background.


You said quoting you, 'The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility. ' and then that she makes 75k salary but will increase her salary to twice that amt in 2 yrs. Do you believe that guys today are hungrily eyeing a woman's salary and think they would go for the money and pick a high salary woman even if she can't have kids? So sexist. Caveat? seriously?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


I think you are over reacting. OP is just asking a question. I see nothing wrong with her OP.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


How is it belitting to see value in the ability to birth children?

It seems like you have some issues.

What is wrong with a man wanting a woman who has the ability to birth children? Nothing. What is wrong with a woman wanting a man who has the ability to provide for her and those children on his own? Nothing.

You people need to get off this "love/affection" nonsense and get a clue.

Peasants.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


I think you are over reacting. OP is just asking a question. I see nothing wrong with her OP.



You said quoting you, 'The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility. ' and then that she makes 75k salary but will increase her salary to twice that amt in 2 yrs. Do you believe that guys today are hungrily eyeing a woman's salary and think they would go for the money and pick a high salary woman even if she can't have kids? So sexist. Caveat? seriously?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


How is it belitting to see value in the ability to birth children?

It seems like you have some issues.

What is wrong with a man wanting a woman who has the ability to birth children? Nothing. What is wrong with a woman wanting a man who has the ability to provide for her and those children on his own? Nothing.

You people need to get off this "love/affection" nonsense and get a clue.

Peasants.




Oh I guess you have a price on you then? No love and affection in a marriage but a price that comes in how much salary you're getting from your husband or wife. No wonder people are cheating around all the time on DCUM!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


How is it belitting to see value in the ability to birth children?

It seems like you have some issues.

What is wrong with a man wanting a woman who has the ability to birth children? Nothing. What is wrong with a woman wanting a man who has the ability to provide for her and those children on his own? Nothing.

You people need to get off this "love/affection" nonsense and get a clue.

Peasants.




Oh I guess you have a price on you then? No love and affection in a marriage but a price that comes in how much salary you're getting from your husband or wife. No wonder people are cheating around all the time on DCUM!


Finance before romance.

I would think that adults would know that anything of value has a cost. Don't be upset because everyone doesn't view themselves as worthless.

Who has time for love and affection if you are broke and hungry? Bills up the wazoo, can't do anything fun, can't have anything nice, but lovey dovey woo woo. Are you 12 years old? Get out of here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


How is it belitting to see value in the ability to birth children?

It seems like you have some issues.

What is wrong with a man wanting a woman who has the ability to birth children? Nothing. What is wrong with a woman wanting a man who has the ability to provide for her and those children on his own? Nothing.

You people need to get off this "love/affection" nonsense and get a clue.

Peasants.




Oh I guess you have a price on you then? No love and affection in a marriage but a price that comes in how much salary you're getting from your husband or wife. No wonder people are cheating around all the time on DCUM!


Finance before romance.

I would think that adults would know that anything of value has a cost. Don't be upset because everyone doesn't view themselves as worthless.

Who has time for love and affection if you are broke and hungry? Bills up the wazoo, can't do anything fun, can't have anything nice, but lovey dovey woo woo. Are you 12 years old? Get out of here.


Uh huh. I know plenty of people who are like you and gold diggers at heart. Despite marrying for money and having big houses in sought after districts they do not hesitate to cheat on one another. I know other couples like me who married for love (FIRST) and supported their spouse's achievements and dreams and are much happier together with romance, love, financial stability, and the great sex that comes when you have it while having great emotions/love for one another. Something I pity you who place FINANCE BEFORE ROMANCE most likely don't have. Kind of childish to want to be a golddigger. Keep on hustlin golddigger.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


Op here. I am a woman. I am not belittling anyone or making anything a bad thing. I was giving simple information which most posters would have asked her age and background.


You said quoting you, 'The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility. ' and then that she makes 75k salary but will increase her salary to twice that amt in 2 yrs. Do you believe that guys today are hungrily eyeing a woman's salary and think they would go for the money and pick a high salary woman even if she can't have kids? So sexist. Caveat? seriously?



Op here. You must have trouble with reading comprehension. I said I was asking about my friend who thinks she is undateable because of her infertility issues. I do not agree with her perception, but I worded it that way to ask what men think. It would be the way she eouod word it if she were asking it because that is what she feels.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


Op here. I am a woman. I am not belittling anyone or making anything a bad thing. I was giving simple information which most posters would have asked her age and background.


You said quoting you, 'The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility. ' and then that she makes 75k salary but will increase her salary to twice that amt in 2 yrs. Do you believe that guys today are hungrily eyeing a woman's salary and think they would go for the money and pick a high salary woman even if she can't have kids? So sexist. Caveat? seriously?



Op here. You must have trouble with reading comprehension. I said I was asking about my friend who thinks she is undateable because of her infertility issues. I do not agree with her perception, but I worded it that way to ask what men think. It would be the way she eouod word it if she were asking it because that is what she feels.


Uh huh I believe you lack writing ability otherwise you would have been clearer and said you opposed your friend's thinking. You did not mention you did not and many people thought you were your friend.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


How is it belitting to see value in the ability to birth children?

It seems like you have some issues.

What is wrong with a man wanting a woman who has the ability to birth children? Nothing. What is wrong with a woman wanting a man who has the ability to provide for her and those children on his own? Nothing.

You people need to get off this "love/affection" nonsense and get a clue.

Peasants.




Oh I guess you have a price on you then? No love and affection in a marriage but a price that comes in how much salary you're getting from your husband or wife. No wonder people are cheating around all the time on DCUM!


Finance before romance.

I would think that adults would know that anything of value has a cost. Don't be upset because everyone doesn't view themselves as worthless.

Who has time for love and affection if you are broke and hungry? Bills up the wazoo, can't do anything fun, can't have anything nice, but lovey dovey woo woo. Are you 12 years old? Get out of here.


Uh huh. I know plenty of people who are like you and gold diggers at heart. Despite marrying for money and having big houses in sought after districts they do not hesitate to cheat on one another. I know other couples like me who married for love (FIRST) and supported their spouse's achievements and dreams and are much happier together with romance, love, financial stability, and the great sex that comes when you have it while having great emotions/love for one another. Something I pity you who place FINANCE BEFORE ROMANCE most likely don't have. Kind of childish to want to be a golddigger. Keep on hustlin golddigger.


That term is not offensive to me.

Everyone is digging for something. What am I supposed to be digging for? Mediocrity? No thanks.

People marry for love first and still get cheated on so what's your point? A broke man will cheat on you just as easily as a wealthy one. At least the wealthy one won't send you to work the next day to put in your 10 plus hour shift (and second shift at home because you can't afford help).

LOL, these delusions are funny.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


How is it belitting to see value in the ability to birth children?

It seems like you have some issues.

What is wrong with a man wanting a woman who has the ability to birth children? Nothing. What is wrong with a woman wanting a man who has the ability to provide for her and those children on his own? Nothing.

You people need to get off this "love/affection" nonsense and get a clue.

Peasants.




Oh I guess you have a price on you then? No love and affection in a marriage but a price that comes in how much salary you're getting from your husband or wife. No wonder people are cheating around all the time on DCUM!


Finance before romance.

I would think that adults would know that anything of value has a cost. Don't be upset because everyone doesn't view themselves as worthless.

Who has time for love and affection if you are broke and hungry? Bills up the wazoo, can't do anything fun, can't have anything nice, but lovey dovey woo woo. Are you 12 years old? Get out of here.


Uh huh. I know plenty of people who are like you and gold diggers at heart. Despite marrying for money and having big houses in sought after districts they do not hesitate to cheat on one another. I know other couples like me who married for love (FIRST) and supported their spouse's achievements and dreams and are much happier together with romance, love, financial stability, and the great sex that comes when you have it while having great emotions/love for one another. Something I pity you who place FINANCE BEFORE ROMANCE most likely don't have. Kind of childish to want to be a golddigger. Keep on hustlin golddigger.


That term is not offensive to me.

Everyone is digging for something. What am I supposed to be digging for? Mediocrity? No thanks.

People marry for love first and still get cheated on so what's your point? A broke man will cheat on you just as easily as a wealthy one. At least the wealthy one won't send you to work the next day to put in your 10 plus hour shift (and second shift at home because you can't afford help).

LOL, these delusions are funny.


That you laugh and are proud to be a golddigger shows your maturity level. You clearly said you don't marry for love first but are eyeballing a man's bank account.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:31, 75k salary but will make 150k salary in two years ( advanced degree), petite, and average attractive. The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility.


OP, you are really belittling a woman's value/worth down to her ability to make babies as if that is what a partner should only look for besides love/affection. Does that even exist anymore in DC between couples who place more value on how much money each makes?

You also mention her high salary and mention her age as if being 31 is a bad thing. Plenty of 20 somethings who make way way wayyyyyyy less than your 'friend' and have fertility issues/hormonal issues to boot and only a community college or high school diploma. You sound like a man to be honest. Are you trying to pimp out your friend to a guy eyeing money and only money?


Op here. I am a woman. I am not belittling anyone or making anything a bad thing. I was giving simple information which most posters would have asked her age and background.


You said quoting you, 'The one caveat is she has fertility issues which will make having biological children an unlikely possibility. ' and then that she makes 75k salary but will increase her salary to twice that amt in 2 yrs. Do you believe that guys today are hungrily eyeing a woman's salary and think they would go for the money and pick a high salary woman even if she can't have kids? So sexist. Caveat? seriously?



Op here. You must have trouble with reading comprehension. I said I was asking about my friend who thinks she is undateable because of her infertility issues. I do not agree with her perception, but I worded it that way to ask what men think. It would be the way she eouod word it if she were asking it because that is what she feels.


Uh huh I believe you lack writing ability otherwise you would have been clearer and said you opposed your friend's thinking. You did not mention you did not and many people thought you were your friend.



I said it in a follow-up post to pp asking if I was the " she" being referred to. Take your whiny feminism somewhere else.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

That you laugh and are proud to be a golddigger shows your maturity level. You clearly said you don't marry for love first but are eyeballing a man's bank account.


I fail to see the problem.

I live on earth. On this planet love doesn't pay the bills, buy groceries, keep a roof over one's head, or behind in nice clothes. Love does not entitle you to travel and fun experiences. If you find my lack of patience for poverty or struggle in my life to be immature, then I will keep on LOLing. You and your consorts are quite entertaining.

You are promoting fairy tales and upset because I'm dealing with reality. Yet your perception is that I lack maturity? How bizarre.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

That you laugh and are proud to be a golddigger shows your maturity level. You clearly said you don't marry for love first but are eyeballing a man's bank account.


I fail to see the problem.

I live on earth. On this planet love doesn't pay the bills, buy groceries, keep a roof over one's head, or behind in nice clothes. Love does not entitle you to travel and fun experiences. If you find my lack of patience for poverty or struggle in my life to be immature, then I will keep on LOLing. You and your consorts are quite entertaining.

You are promoting fairy tales and upset because I'm dealing with reality. Yet your perception is that I lack maturity? How bizarre.


Wow pity you grew up with such low integrity and morale that you value others first on how much money they can give you. You must have had a really poor upbringing or had a fear of poverty and struggle at a young age to be in that position. Luckily I was not in that fear of poverty position and grew up with both money and love but more emphasis on love and affection that I valued more.

No, not promoting fairy tales. I guess I just do not see the world through a golddiggers eyes.
post reply Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: