PK3: Seaton v. LAMB

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Post last night at 23:23 said they're in the 70s, but who knows...

I can confirm that they are in the 60s, but I am not sure they are in the 70s yet. Community assignments were given out late last week, so the classes are likely pretty set. For the PP in the 80s, it may still be tough. If you do get in, it will probably be after school starts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Post last night at 23:23 said they're in the 70s, but who knows...

I can confirm that they are in the 60s, but I am not sure they are in the 70s yet. Community assignments were given out late last week, so the classes are likely pretty set. For the PP in the 80s, it may still be tough. If you do get in, it will probably be after school starts.

Oops, I meant late this week, not last week.

[Anonymous]

Can someone speak to the racial diversity at LAMB? One of the best qualities of Seaton is the diversity in the student and staff population. I want our child to be with lots of students and teachers that look and are different.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone speak to the racial diversity at LAMB? One of the best qualities of Seaton is the diversity in the student and staff population. I want our child to be with lots of students and teachers that look and are different.

LAMB staff and administrators are diverse and mostly of people of color.

You can look up the student demographics here (one year old but it hasn't changed much) http://learndc.org/schoolprofiles/search

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Post last night at 23:23 said they're in the 70s, but who knows...

I can confirm that they are in the 60s, but I am not sure they are in the 70s yet. Community assignments were given out late last week, so the classes are likely pretty set. For the PP in the 80s, it may still be tough. If you do get in, it will probably be after school starts.

They are in 70s. If I had to guess, based on movement last few years, they'll get into 80s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Post last night at 23:23 said they're in the 70s, but who knows...

I can confirm that they are in the 60s, but I am not sure they are in the 70s yet. Community assignments were given out late last week, so the classes are likely pretty set. For the PP in the 80s, it may still be tough. If you do get in, it will probably be after school starts.

They are in 70s. If I had to guess, based on movement last few years, they'll get into 80s.

In the last few years multiple new classes have opened. This hearn

[Anonymous]

Not to troll here but I feel like OP knows very little about Lamb. Maybe stick to Seaton.

[Anonymous]

We just got in! lower 80's! there's hope.

[Anonymous]

It's amazing what an abuse scandal can do to a waitlist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing what an abuse scandal can do to a waitlist.

No. They always get pretty high. And opened a new class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing what an abuse scandal can do to a waitlist.

No. They always get pretty high. And opened a new class.

More about what a potential yet uncertain campus relocation does, if anything.

Also don't forget that anyone and everyone applies to Lamb because it's a separate lottery. Many of them don't really know the first thing about the school or live anywhere near its campuses.

[Anonymous]

Congrats to the lower 80s poster! Just need it to move a couple more spots for us. Any other intel about the status of the PK3 waitlist would be greatly appreciated!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not to troll here but I feel like OP knows very little about Lamb. Maybe stick to Seaton.

I was thinking the same. Stick to Seaton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing what an abuse scandal can do to a waitlist.

No. They always get pretty high. And opened a new class.

More about what a potential yet uncertain campus relocation does, if anything.

Also don't forget that anyone and everyone applies to Lamb because it's a separate lottery. Many of them don't really know the first thing about the school or live anywhere near its campuses.

I thought LAMB had a building at Walter Reed, next to DCI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing what an abuse scandal can do to a waitlist.

No. They always get pretty high. And opened a new class.

More about what a potential yet uncertain campus relocation does, if anything.

Also don't forget that anyone and everyone applies to Lamb because it's a separate lottery. Many of them don't really know the first thing about the school or live anywhere near its campuses.

I thought LAMB had a building at Walter Reed, next to DCI.

Yes they do for upper grades.