Exactly. Hire a temp to do the basic admin so many of us spend a TON of time on. My boss was wonderful about this. I took 4 months, of which only 5 weeks was paid. But he would have let me take as much time as I needed. And he was very clear with the people filling in for me that if they were overloaded to let him know and he'd spread things out to other people or hire someone to help. It helped her had 4 kids at home so he really respects work/life balance. |
| Five months is a long-ass time to be covering someone. That's all. |
Np here. I don't mind covering for others when they're out. |
You're lying. Can you seriously say you're okay covering for someone else if it means a lot of added stress and missing out on your own family events? (not getting home in time to make dinner, spend time with your own children/husband/etc) |
Not really. You're not getting paid extra for the extra work. You're doing the work so a new person doesn't have to be hired so that the person's job can be saved. That's a favor. |
No, it's doing work for their employer, thus THEIR JOB. Look, I'm not saying that OPs coworkers don't have any right to be upset at the lack of coverage. My company recently offered people early retirement buyouts and a significant number of my coworkers took them up on it. The people who took the benefits package will not be backfilled so those of us left will have to fill in and pick up their work without any additional compensation. That doesn't mean the people leaving owe us anything. It's the company that is getting the benefit of not backfilling those positions and putting the work on existing employees. No one on this board would tell me I have any right to be upset with the people leaving if I posted that I was pissed at them for leaving me with extra work. |
A temp can absolutely be hired, particularly if part of the leave is unpaid. If management decides not to hire a temp or otherwise try to alleviate the burden on other employees, that's a management problem. It's not a problem caused by someone who went through the proper channels and had their leave request approved. Your anger is misplaced. |
Yes it is. I don't think anybody is arguing that. But how is that relevant to the issue at hand? OP is legally entitled to mat leave and got it. Any other issues are between the company and hercoworkers. (Ps - another person who is SO glad I'm Canadian). |
Lucky you! |
|
It's amazing how many times someone has gone out for a longer-than-normal leave, and since we were forced to figure out how to handle the work, we realized that person wasn't really that needed anyway. OP, have everything in writing. You are protected during FMLA, but you won't be protected legally in the additional time.
The US is set up really poorly to provide temporary coverage for leaves of absence compared to other countries. |
| Ignore it. Totally unprofessional. |
|
I wonder if your coworkers would have said something if you needed to take this much time off for another health reason, like recovering from surgery, getting chemo therapy, or taking care of an elderly parent.
It's amazing how if you switched out "parental leave" and replaced it with something not related to babies or child care, that responses may be more forgiving. We could stand to be more forgiving of folks. If you take care of people (at home or in the office), it shows in the work they do. Sorry OP that you are facing this. Congrats though and enjoy the leave! |
| say "I'm taking unpaid leave (which they probably don't know), so you should ask boss to use that savings to hire a temp for a couple months to help out" |
This is what I was thinking.. 5 months is nothing. No wonder so many moms suffer from PPD |
| It sounds like there are a fair number of colleagues with whom to share the extra work so I don't think this must resentment is usual. I suspect they're more jealous of you for taking longer than they felt able to do. Maybe nicely remind them that it's important for women to stick together. |