New report out: Confirms that right wing extremism and violence is worse than muslims...

[Anonymous]

As former counter-terrorism analyst Daryl Johnson acknowledges:

“The U.S. government currently employs hundreds of analysts focused on Islamic extremism, but only a couple dozen who monitor domestic terror.”

Wonder why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As former counter-terrorism analyst Daryl Johnson acknowledges:

“The U.S. government currently employs hundreds of analysts focused on Islamic extremism, but only a couple dozen who monitor domestic terror.”

Wonder why?

Because when liberals say domestic terrorist they mean whit guys, never mind the recent terrorist attack in Alexandria and the two Islamic domestic terror attacks in Fl and Ca.

The site is a farce. Tying JLL to right wing extremism is a far stretch when even investigators couldn't and didn't tie him to any ideology. In fact, the liberals tried desperately to tie him to a Palin map. They had to come out and apologize and say there's no evidence of a connection. Took them eight years but they finally did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:...or supposed "violent liberals"

Yes, that's right. A study by the Nation Institute going back over the last 8 years found that right wing extremists have been involved in far more domestic plots and plotting than anyone else, they are twice as big of a danger to Americans than muslim extremists are.

https://www.revealnews.org/article/home-is-where-the-hate-is/

What if they went back 16 years?

They will never do that and you know why.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:...or supposed "violent liberals"

Yes, that's right. A study by the Nation Institute going back over the last 8 years found that right wing extremists have been involved in far more domestic plots and plotting than anyone else, they are twice as big of a danger to Americans than muslim extremists are.

https://www.revealnews.org/article/home-is-where-the-hate-is/

What if they went back 16 years?

They will never do that and you know why.

Well, why not go back 50 years?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:...or supposed "violent liberals"

Yes, that's right. A study by the Nation Institute going back over the last 8 years found that right wing extremists have been involved in far more domestic plots and plotting than anyone else, they are twice as big of a danger to Americans than muslim extremists are.

https://www.revealnews.org/article/home-is-where-the-hate-is/

What if they went back 16 years?

They will never do that and you know why.

How about we go back to Oklahoma City, jackass. More right wing terrorism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As former counter-terrorism analyst Daryl Johnson acknowledges:

“The U.S. government currently employs hundreds of analysts focused on Islamic extremism, but only a couple dozen who monitor domestic terror.”

Wonder why?

Because when liberals say domestic terrorist they mean whit guys, never mind the recent terrorist attack in Alexandria and the two Islamic domestic terror attacks in Fl and Ca.

The site is a farce. Tying JLL to right wing extremism is a far stretch when even investigators couldn't and didn't tie him to any ideology. In fact, the liberals tried desperately to tie him to a Palin map. They had to come out and apologize and say there's no evidence of a connection. Took them eight years but they finally did.

Okay, fine, so take Loughner out of the mix. Now you have a few thousand left to go.

For all of your whining you didn't make a dent.

The point still stands. Right wing extremism is a huge problem in America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:...or supposed "violent liberals"

Yes, that's right. A study by the Nation Institute going back over the last 8 years found that right wing extremists have been involved in far more domestic plots and plotting than anyone else, they are twice as big of a danger to Americans than muslim extremists are.

https://www.revealnews.org/article/home-is-where-the-hate-is/

What if they went back 16 years?

They will never do that and you know why.

Well, why not go back 50 years?

We can, but it would not make sense.
We can also expand data set to mass murders of civilians committed by Muslim terrorists worldwide, but it also does not make sense, because we are discussing very narrow data subset - loss of lifes to Muslim terrorism vs loss of lifes to white extremists attacks on the US soil in modern history.

Significant count of murders by Muslim terror began with twin towers attack and this why it was left omitted by the lefties social "scientists".

Significant social tragedies/catastrophies are traditionally counted since the point when act of war or terrorism actually happens and shakes society to the core - Russian revolution of 1917, WW1 and WW2, Hiroshima bombing, twin tower attack, Oklahoma building bombing, etc., etc..
What happened 50 years ago that shook the nation?
You can include Oklahoma building explosion in your argument, though, but it still would not make up for the number of lifes lost to Muslim terrorism on the US soil in modern history.

Libs can manipulate data all they want, but statistics is honest, straightforward, revealing and people see it. And they realize what libs are trying to achieve here.
That's why why libs will continue to lose their grounds.

[Anonymous]

I am more afraid of those ugly white guys than Muslims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am more afraid of those ugly white guys than Muslims.

Why exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am more afraid of those ugly white guys than Muslims.

Why exactly?

Statistics and personal experience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am more afraid of those ugly white guys than Muslims.

Why exactly?

DP but there's more of them around in mainstream America than there are muslim terrorists. And, the right wing white guys are more likely to be able to get guns than some bushy bearded Arab named Mohammed. Right wing militia guys are creepy. And I'm saying that as a white guy who owns guns, myself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:...or supposed "violent liberals"

Yes, that's right. A study by the Nation Institute going back over the last 8 years found that right wing extremists have been involved in far more domestic plots and plotting than anyone else, they are twice as big of a danger to Americans than muslim extremists are.

https://www.revealnews.org/article/home-is-where-the-hate-is/

What if they went back 16 years?

What if we go back 50 years to the good ol' days of lynching?

Let's do it.

Plenty of Muslims immigrated to the US - primarily the South - after the civil war through the 1920s when US law prohibited the immigration of non-Europeans. Surely no members if the religion of peace were involved in lynchings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As former counter-terrorism analyst Daryl Johnson acknowledges:

“The U.S. government currently employs hundreds of analysts focused on Islamic extremism, but only a couple dozen who monitor domestic terror.”

Wonder why?

Except, that's false. There's a lot more than a "couple dozen" dealing with domestic terror.

[Anonymous]

You know what this is, bullshit. You don't ultimately fulfill those fantasies of a peaceful utopian society by constantly arguing about which political ideology is more violent. If we're going to get there it'll be by abhorring all violence regardless of what party the people are who commit the act are affiliated with and paying attention to all extremists regardless of whether they're wearing a taqiyah or a scull cap or a baseball hat and regardless whether they're brown or black or white. You know what that is it's bullshit used to sway or opinions and swing our votes for the people in elected office this bickering about who's worse doesn't benefit anyone but those who seek to obtain power and profit thru subliminal persuasion and propaganda.
Wake y'all asses up!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No kidding. But our President is cutting funding to all Homeland security programs that aren't directed at "Islamic extremism," and he is encouraging the fear-mongering that encourages the right-wing psychopaths.

Why are you so dead set on allowing Islamic terrorists and followers to come to this country? What part of Islam is compatible with America?