Since the blue states subsidize the red, your handouts statement is comical. And Dems have been defending the constitution for quite a while now. Try reading some legal scholarship. Oh, wait, they don't post those on Infowars. |
That's not true. People were citing his lack of respect for the Constitution when he talked about a Muslim registry and threatened to ban the NYT. |
| I've been following Evan Mcmullin on Twitter since the election and I've been very impressed. I'm a democrat but I would seriously consider voting for him. To me, he comes across as honorable and a thinker like Obama. |
I wonder if you would have been as impressed with him had he not been opposed to Trump. |
so the only person who can criticize trump is someone who is not a critic of him. do you guys even listen to yourselves? ludicrous. |
| Amazing how what was a civil discourse on this thread can go downhill so fast! |
Well, I'm not sure how to separate the two in this case. I'm sure you are right because you can't really square his principled vision and defense of the constitution with what Trump is doing. My hysteria about Trump is not about policy. It's everything else. I'm honestly jealous of Trump supporters. I wish I thought he was great and this was good for America. Instead, I've been in a state of constant anxiety since the election. |
As I said, I did not vote for Trump and I have concerns about his adherence to the constitution. But at this point he has been elected president and I will give him a fair chance to implement his policies. There is this endless criticism by liberals - and I am a liberal - of his cabinet appointments but for the most part he has been nominating people who will implement the policies that he said he would. He will appoint Supreme Court justices who are conservatives because he said he was going to do so. We may not like his choices because of their philosophy but that is an inevitable result of his election. As Obama said, elections have consequences and Trump's election is no exception. |
|
Very ironic a former CIA officer would claim to be interested in the rights of Americans.
|
Exactly. Liberals/progressives/democratics are neurotic and anti-intellectual. Every policy difference or political disagreement is a matter for utter hysteria and paranoia. Witness all those people actually breaking out into tears and throwing temper tantrums when Hillary lost. What immaturity! And you think you people should be running things? LOL |
Many Trump voters don't think Trump is "great." Instead, they see someone who may actually get things done. I don't care for Trump much, but I voted for him for this reason. He's not a politician and I'm hoping he governs the way he's run his businesses. With common sense. |
+1000 I have zero interest in this country being run by people who need safe spaces to process any slightly uncomfortable action. |
I was just thinking that myself tonight. I am not scared of normal conservative policies- don't like them but I am not scared. I am scared of his authoritarian - follow my gut approach- unpredictability. I have not posted any criticism about his appointments, except for Bannon- who is not an appointment and has a nationalistic economic plan as his ideal that would make FDR proud and Reagan turn in his grave. The Goldman Sachs appointments are actually reassuring to me because they look like politics as usual...they are only amusing in the context of what he promised the little guy but not scary. |
And therefore you shouldn't oppose policies and appointments you think are wrong? That's ridiculous. You're essentially saying that presidents should not be criticized. This isn't an autocracy. |
Who are the hysterics again? Because it isn't liberals who are making up conspiracy theories and bringing rifles to pizza restaurants. |