Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
If you are a current student, family or extended community, and you have specific questions, then talk to someone on the faculty or in the administration. If you are a potential parent or student, then please feel free to schedule a meeting with the school so that they can answer any questions that you might have. However, if you are just a lookey-loo completely unassociated with, or uninterested in the School, but still expecting to get some "dirt" or a "scoop" on this anonymous forum, then look elsewhere because the students, parents, faculty, staff, and administrators, and extended school community, while more than willing to address these things in the safe space of the School, do not consider this a "safe space" in which to address its issues. |
Except here, on DCUM, an "open" forum, where no one will answer the questions about these conflicts and differences. |
|
[quote=Anonymous]It seems this is a case of GDS to the City: "Watch what we say, not what we do." The hypocrisy of the whole thing is of a piece with the school's high-handed treatment of the community and the city in its rezoning disaster. Character matters---personally and institutionally.[/quote]
Just the opposite. When what you do is to confront and address issues and differences openly and head-on, no matter how difficult those may be - instead of sweeping them under a rug, or worse, tacitly suppressing their expression for fear of reprisals or repercussions - you demonstrate the ethical and beneficial characteristics of openness, honesty, and transparency, as well as a willingness to examine yourself, to change when necessary, and to work to improve. That is a good example for the students, the community, the neighbors, and the City. The students and families expect no less of their School, and the local government can expect the same. |
I can, but they'll probably be removed. That seems to be the pattern. There have been a number of incidents this year at the HS and the MS involving consent, social media, racism, hazing (including a beating that caused welts), and sexism and its relationship to rape culture. Not infrequently, an incident involves more than one of these elements. An increasing number of students and parents see discipline at the school as "arbitrary and capricious." (That's the parents talking, obviously.) The administration vacillates between swift and ruthless vs. swept under the rug. Situations involving groups of kids, all of whom are doing something wrong, often lead to punishment for a few and not for others. Punishment almost always seems to involve some form of separation from the community and there's so much obfuscation around discipline that it's unclear who is being disciplined for what. That wouldn't inherently be a problem if there were clear rules and clear penalties, but there aren't. Throw in a 24/7 policy that enables the school to discipline students for incidents that occur off campus in contexts where the school is not in a supervisory role (e.g. private parties) and a complete lack of process into the mix, and you've got a perfect storm. |
That is because an anonymous DCUM forum, while certainly "open", is clearly not a "safe space" for any public or private school's students, families, or community to address their issues. I know that you understand that, and hopefully you respect the need of all schools to protect their students' privacy. |
They make Trump look weak. Instead of building a wall, they annexed the Safeway.
|
FIFY
|
|
This is an example of keeping problems out of public view.
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It seems this is a case of GDS to the City: "Watch what we say, not what we do." The hypocrisy of the whole thing is of a piece with the school's high-handed treatment of the community and the city in its rezoning disaster. Character matters---personally and institutionally.[/quote] Just the opposite. When what you do is to confront and address issues and differences openly and head-on, no matter how difficult those may be - instead of sweeping them under a rug, or worse, tacitly suppressing their expression for fear of reprisals or repercussions - you demonstrate the ethical and beneficial characteristics of openness, honesty, and transparency, as well as a willingness to examine yourself, to change when necessary, and to work to improve. That is a good example for the students, the community, the neighbors, and the City. The students and families expect no less of their School, and the local government can expect the same.[/quote] |
Yes, exactly my point as well. |
|
[quote=Anonymous]This is an example of keeping problems out of public view.
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It seems this is a case of GDS to the City: "Watch what we say, not what we do." The hypocrisy of the whole thing is of a piece with the school's high-handed treatment of the community and the city in its rezoning disaster. Character matters---personally and institutionally.[/quote] Just the opposite. When what you do is to confront and address issues and differences openly and head-on, no matter how difficult those may be - instead of sweeping them under a rug, or worse, tacitly suppressing their expression for fear of reprisals or repercussions - you demonstrate the ethical and beneficial characteristics of openness, honesty, and transparency, as well as a willingness to examine yourself, to change when necessary, and to work to improve. That is a good example for the students, the community, the neighbors, and the City. The students and families expect no less of their School, and the local government can expect the same.[/quote][/quote] Maybe if they had football at GDS the students could "confront and address issues and differences openly and head-on". Literally. |
You left out the part about the many parents who are legal bigwigs. That surely adds an interesting tint. Maybe GDS could learn something from Landon? They have a very open and transparent honor code and judicial system. |
| Are you kidding me? Landon? |
| Current parent not super connected to the administration - if you see a situation requiring discipline, make a decision then defend it. No need to make every situation a referendum on race relations which tells your students that genetics matter more than conduct. |
| Yes, one parent at last week's forum said she thought Landon handled these issues much better than GDS. |
|
It's not about race; it's about due process. Whether the school can confiscate and download the contents of a (minor) student's cellphone without contacting the parent, whether it can pressure a minor to sign a written "apology" (again without the parent involved) that includes statements the student believes are false. Whether an investigation, once concluded, can be reopened. Whether the accused has the right to see evidence against him/her and have evidence in his/her own defense considered. What standard of proof will be used in contested cases. Whether there is an appeals process. Whether the school, lacking clear and consistent evidence sufficient to justify an expulsion, can ban a student from campus indefinitely. Really basic stuff like that.
It's important to disentangle these issues from any specific case. That's how process issues work -- we evaluate fairness by assuming an accused is innocent -- does a process like this give the accused a fair chance to disprove an allegation? Is this how you would want your private school to treat your child? |