Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:College matriculation does matter. Period. Maybe not in the way that "who got into school x?" does, but it is a useful way to compare schools.
5 year stats are less useful than current trends.
Last I heard it takes at least three data points to make a "trend," so even if one accepts the statement above you would need at least 3 years worth of statistics. That said, I am in the camp of the earlier poster who thinks most of this is useless in comparing the quality of private schools or their fit for a given student. Moreover, it is of little relevance for evaluating the schools preparation for students aiming for a particular major -- If private X sends 4 kids to ivy Z -- one to its performing arts school, two likely humanities kids, and a starting ball player, that doesn't tell me anything about my kid's likely preparation or odds of getting into the same ivy from private x if my kid wants to apply to its engineering school -- and vice versa. Frankly, I can think of a few macro reasons why admissions could be shaken up a bit this year. For one, as income disparity grows but the recovery lifts more upper income folks even higher, I can see families that three years ago opted for the honors program at prestigious State U now considering paying for private. That can drive up competition. Or on the other end of the economic spectrum, some top schools have committed to expanding socio-economic diversity --not great news for children of affluent families at privates. And getting back to why matriculation rates are not that helpful as measures of a school's quality, one of the other factors needed to compare apples and oranges is the Quest-Bridge program. How many students were admitted through this program from a given high school. All are relevant factors and more. The individual student has much more to do with acceptances than the high school attended.