Smart idea, in general. |
| I would NOT disclose. The incident and the result sounds unbelievably sketchy and will definitely raise huge question marks. |
|
I work in a different area. My work involves Security Clearances. In this, they give a form which includes arrests. In that circumstance disclose.
I would look at the questions asked: if they talk about convictions, no need to disclose. If they talk about arrests, better to disclose. FWIW, I have some experience with ambian. My take is it does not help you sleep, but you forget you were awake all night. |
| Op here. Disclosed and got an offer. Was told this is not an issue at all |
Read the new legislation. You have to have a specific reason for why the conviction makes the candidate a risk. You also have to provide them with detailed information on how the law applies to them and how they can file a complaint with the DC gov. What other state has these mandates? |
|
OP here. i agree and disagree. disagree in the sense that the law appears to have no teeth. an applicant/employee can file a complaint with the DC govt, but there is no private cause of action, and the potential penalty is a fine of up to a few thousand dollars. i also think that a biglaw firm could somehow justify dinging a candidate for any blemish on his/her record. |
| OP again. was told that the incident did come up on my check, and I think that disclosing may have assured that I didn't get the offer rescinded. FYI for others. |
| congrats OP! |