Disagreement with my husband

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We circumcised our son but if my husband didn't want to I wouldn't have. If one person's preference involves optional surgery and the other's doesn't, I would go with the preference for no surgery.

I agree, and there are risks to circumcision just like any other operation.

[Anonymous]

For those here that believe in evolution, maybe you should stop and consider there might be a reason for that foreskin to still be present.

[Anonymous]

Relevant:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He's the one with a penis, I think the advantage goes to him. I let my dh decide for our son.

She'll probably be the one taking care of most of the diapers and toilet training so she should decide.

WOW! The decision should be made based upon what is more convenient for the mother?
For the record, there isn't that much of a difference.

[Anonymous]

what happened? There were four pages of comments and now there are three.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:what happened? There were four pages of comments and now there are three.

Did Jeff do that? There was a really great discussion going on

[Anonymous]

(OP here) At least one of my comments get deleted and idk why? I don't feel like typing it up again but I basically said that boys now a days are still almost always circumcised as far as I knew and from what I've seen changing diapers at day care, just about every boy is cut, and if my son isn't circumcisied he'll be the odd one out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:(OP here) At least one of my comments get deleted and idk why? I don't feel like typing it up again but I basically said that boys now a days are still almost always circumcised as far as I knew and from what I've seen changing diapers at day care, just about every boy is cut, and if my son isn't circumcisied he'll be the odd one out

He won't. Fewer and fewer newborn males are cut every year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So much wow in this post.

Yeah, yikes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Circumcision is barbaric. Please don't mutilate your son by removing the most functional and sensitive part of his sex organ. Consider if you were removing the inner labia of your daughter because it might be "cleaner".

Haha oh please. I thank my lucky stars that my parents chose to circumcise me when I was a baby (so I couldn't remember it).

I've had multiple friends who did it in their early 20's because they were self-conscious about it for aesthetic reasons (and these weren't guys who lacked overall confidence or had any problem attracting ladies). I did not envy their pain and recovery period, but I do know they don't regret their decision to circumcise later in life.

[Anonymous]

I would show your husband the actual research about the medical benefits of circumcision. Perhaps have a meeting with a pediatrician and/or a urologist to discuss the facts. But there's no right or wrong here--there are some health benefits to circumcision, but they aren't overwhelming. Stop viewing it like an argument you need to win and start looking at it like an issue that you both need to consider and decide together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:(OP here) At least one of my comments get deleted and idk why? I don't feel like typing it up again but I basically said that boys now a days are still almost always circumcised as far as I knew and from what I've seen changing diapers at day care, just about every boy is cut, and if my son isn't circumcisied he'll be the odd one out

Circumcision may not be as prevalent as you think.

Overall from 1999 to 2010, the CDC’s weighted analysis found that the approximate percentage of newborn US males who were circumcised was approximately 59.1% according to the NHDS, 57.8% according to the NIS, and 55.8% according to the CDM. The incidence of newborn male circumcision decreased over time in all 3 data sources: from 62.5% in 1999 to 56.9% in 2008
according to the NHDS; from 63.5% in 1999 to 56.3% in 2008 according to the NIS; and from 58.4% in 2001 to
54.7% in 2010 according to the CDM. (analysis only included data taken from hospitals.)

[Anonymous]

Below is a link to a Cosmopolitan article titles “Sex Talk Realness: Circumcised Penises vs. Uncircumcised Penises"

http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/a32417/sex-talk-realness-circumcision/

There wasn’t a consensus. The photo at the beginning of the article cracked me up.

[Anonymous]

... In 1971 and 1975, the American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision declared: "...there are no valid medical indications for circumcision in the neonatal period."2 In 1978, the position of the American Academy of Pediatrics was endorsed by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.64 In 1983 both groups jointly reaffirmed their positions.1 The "firm" firm declarations should have caused a marked drop in the United States circumcision rate. They did not...

Source:http://www.cirp.org/library/general/wallerstein/" target="_new" rel="nofollow"> http://www.cirp.org/library/general/wallerstein/

The more I read on the topic, the less likely it seems that there are medical reasons for male circumcision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Circumcision is barbaric. Please don't mutilate your son by removing the most functional and sensitive part of his sex organ. Consider if you were removing the inner labia of your daughter because it might be "cleaner".

Haha oh please. I thank my lucky stars that my parents chose to circumcise me when I was a baby (so I couldn't remember it).

I've had multiple friends who did it in their early 20's because they were self-conscious about it for aesthetic reasons (and these weren't guys who lacked overall confidence or had any problem attracting ladies). I did not envy their pain and recovery period, but I do know they don't regret their decision to circumcise later in life.

Another man here. I call bullshit.