It's nice to see that you are not limiting your distinctive assh*lery to the Hill elementary school discussion. Notwithstanding your reframing of my question, I was attempting to elicit specific information about DC, in part, because DCPS doesn't really do immersion/dual-language all that well. An article about a charter school in St. Louis doesn't alter this reality. |
| Barf. Why not math immersion or coding immersion? It is one thing to have charters doing immersion; quite another neighborhoid schools with 0 connection to the immersion language. I can't believe parents are still fixated on "Chinese" immersion as some kind of panacea. |
|
There's a big difference between immersion schools that are charter or magnet, and serve children whose families have chosen immersion, and immersion schools as neighborhood schools.
There's also a big difference in the educational needs of students who are low income but live in stable housing in communities where they plan to stay long term, and students who are homeless and living in temporary or transitional housing. Kids in the latter situation need educational continuity. That is, they benefit when there are common standards and consistent scope and sequence between schools. Moving into a school where you don't have the prerequisite skills to be successful because you weren't there when they were taught is really hard. Spending 6 years (K - 5, assuming you didn't get in in the PK lottery) in a Mandarin immersion school can be a wonderful experience for a child from any language background. Spending 6 months in one is useless. Having said this, this is an issue that DCPS needs to solve the issue of how to assign kids to immersion programs. I've known several families who, for very good reasons, didn't want their students in an immersion program. For example, I knew a family who adopted older kids internationally, and wanted English and catching up in English literacy to be the focus during the first few years, but DCPS insisted that they send their kids to Oyster. I've known another family that was already multi-lingual, and had a kid with a disability that impacted their language. They felt that adding another language wasn't the right time, but again DCPS insisted. I personally think that schools should be paired, with one English only and one immersion option for the neighborhood, so that families can make the choice that's right for them, and priority given to kids in certain categories (e.g. kids with IEPs, kids who are homeless). |
Um, the asshole is you. Based upon your misreading of the posters comment, you asked for something irrelevant- a scenario where DCPS does something. You assumed that poster was saying that DCPS has done will with immersion time and time again. See what happens when you ASSume! |
|
Oh, please take your petty fights and bad tempers elsewhere!
The substance of this thread is interesting and I'd like to hear more about it, pros, cons, implications, limitations, synergies and all. |
Exactly. And Mandarin as opposed to Spanish? Mandarin is to this decade what Japanese was to the 80's and 90's. |
Because Miner is under enrolled, they're trying to attract some of the Yu Ying-loving crowd on the Hill that's currently enrolled in Maury, LT, and Brent, opening up more room in those schools for those not seeking dual language immersion. |
Having spent some time at Miner, I agree this is not the best use of funds. There are other exciting and other ways to improve enrollment by offering subjects that are more transferable. How about STEM, Medical, or media, languages like Mandarin etc are just the trend at the moment. Sigh.... |
| I agree that you would need paired schools in which in-bounds students can choose the specialty program or a traditional school. And not within the same school building, which creates a weird dynamic like Tyler. Or make the Mandarin program at Miner a citywide draw like SWS or Logan. |
|
This is a bad idea. What use will most of these students have for mandarin? How can we justify the serious investment in reading characters this will require and to the detriment of others skills?
Signed USG Asia specialist with many years of mandarin training |
| Aside from everything else, I would only consider enrolling my kid in Miner Chinese Immersion if my kid was negative 10 years old. DCPS just doesn't do things well in the short term, and putting a Chinese program at Miner is no easy lift. |
Maybe "these" students could become USG Asia specialists, or work abroad, or work in companies that do business with China? |
well, they need to know how to proficiently read and write in English first |
Nice passive aggressive use of quotes. Maybe they could go into the careers you mention but the number of positions that really value Chinese skills in this country are few and far between- in fact, there are virtually none. Students' time and energy and tax payers' money would be better put to developing core academic skills and Chinese immersion will simply distract from that with little benefit to students. You should also know that "abroad" is a pretty big place and most of the people who live there don't -- wait for it -- speak Mandarin. |
I think Mandarin is going to be in much greater demand by the time current elementary school students graduate. Would love to get into Yu Ying, but since I've struck out, would love another Mandarin immersion option. |