Who cares what "the government" thinks. If someone is having three glasses of wine every night and it isn't having an adverse effect on family, friends, work, or anything else, and they are happy, then why should some "agency" get to decide that you have a problem? You either have a real problem or you don't. And two glasses vs three glasses isn't the defining factor. |
| Sounds like a heck of a guy. Grown men playing video games. Deal breaker unless he's bringing a paycheck in from it |
Human beings have been rationalizing their use of alcohol for a long time. It is a drug that people use and abuse to get a buzz, get high, get drunk, get tipsy, whatever. 3 drinks a day, everyday is a lot of alcohol. Plenty of alcohol abusers outside of North America. You are rationalizing the use of alcohol by calling people in North America uptight because they recognize drinking daily is just like having Valium or any other drug daily. |
LOL. Playing video games to the point of neglecting your spouse would be one thing, but probably a pretty good percentage of men under the age of 50 occasionally like to play video games. I don't personally as I have other free time hobbies, but nearly every other guy in my department has an XBox or Playstation, and it's not for their kids. You sound like someone I'm glad not to know. |
Sounds like my MIL and her nightly vodka. Who wants to around someone who needs to drink every day of their life. Gross. My MIL thought she was entitled also to her nightly drinks but she was a crappy parent because booze ruins families. |
So don't drink alcohol then. |
Do you have difficulties with reading comprehension? I specifically said (if) "it isn't having an adverse effect on family, friends, work, or anything else, and they are happy..." Clearly in your example that wasn't the case. As I said, the "problem" shouldn't be defined by some arbitrary number, but by whether there's actually a problem. |
I agree- a problem should not be defined by an arbitrary number. However, functional alcoholism doesn't necessarily mean its a "problem". Someone can be physically and mentally addicted to a substance, need to use it daily, and still function. But they're still an alcoholic because they're dependent on alcohol. I also am on the right end of the bell curve but for someone to say 3 drinks a day- a bottle of wine- isn't "heavy drinking" or potentially at-risk behavior is in denial, IMO. |
This is a legitimate question. I think the answer lies entirely within the person doing the drinking. If its ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to drink those 3 glasses or they panic, then thats a problem. If its just their strong preference, but they could take it or leave it, its another. Addiction is tricky business. |