Nope, it has spoken. You just aren't listening. |
Those were basal readers. They are not the same thing you are talking about. And, they were not used in kindergarten. |
Hard to figure out a vocabulary word when you are six and have never heard it before. Oral language needs to come first. |
Exactly PP. I teach ESOL students and many of them come to kindergarten having no English skills at all. The teachers are frustrated (and so are the admins) that these kids aren't able to decode and read by now. Um, hello? 4 months ago, they didn't know any English. They are developing their oral vocabulary. Expecting them to be at the same level as their native English speaking peers 4 months into school is absurd. The teachers are out under tremendous pressure to get the kids to a benchmark level D by the end of the year. What will happen is that maybe the kids can decode the words but they don't actually understand the words they are decoding. I just keep reminding myself that I didn't know how to read in kindergarten and I have 2 Master's degrees. My students are proficient in 2 languages by age 8-10 yrs old. Not too shabby. |
There are many kids who do not have the vocabulary they need--not just ESOL. First things first. |
It sounds as if you are frustrated because your son is not at the same reading level as his friend. In life there will always be someone better so now is an excellent time to teach him about doing the best he can and not focusing on others.
|
|
why is early better than average? The great fallacy of today's education. early is not better than average, it's earlier than average. Absolutely no benefit in the long term. |
Yes--this is exactly what happened to my godson. He grew up in a very poor school district/schools where early decoding was stressed. He's now a great decoder in high school but comprehends very little about what he has just read. He's been tested and his IQ is average. |
Yes, people are so thrilled their child is "reading" that they don't realize he really isn't. Result of push, push, push. |
I'm in my mid-50s and was taught with "Dick and Jane" readers -- in first grade. Today, that's an utter failure -- and yet somehow, I managed to graduate 5th in my class of more than 900 students, get a job right out of college. I've never been voluntarily unemployed. And yet somehow, my late reading instruction is a tragedy today. |
^^^^^Lots of people are under the impression that “Dick and Jane” relied only on sight words. This is not true. It was an excellent basal reader program which taught: phonics, sight words, comprehension, and other reading skills. Teachers were encouraged to talk about the pictures with the kids and ask them leading questions to develop thinking skills.
The pictures were clever and funny to the kids. In the hands of a good teacher, this was an excellent program. It has been much maligned because most people think it was just “see/say”. It was not. |
Could you please provide some evidence to support this statement? How do you define "most countries", and how do you define "teach kids to read"? |
Yes, and my father got into medical school without having taken any calculus. Times change. |
You are the one challenging that. Google is your friend. |