Not pp but they're posted online. Everything we have is very transparent: http://www.opm.gov/healthcare-insurance/healthcare/plan-information/premiums/ I have VA Kaiser high which is a very basic plan and generally the cheapest insurance. Kaiser is known for being no frills. For myself it's $274.80 a pay period. So $7144.80 a year. DH isn't on my plan The family plan is $632 a pay period, $16,432 a year. |
Huh? I searched that plan for non-postal feds that are paid monthly (to keep it simple) and the premiums are $168 and $423 a month. http://www.opm.gov/healthcare-insurance/healthcare/plan-information/compare-plans/PlanProfiles.aspx?plans=E31VAHMOH&rates=a&benefits=x&quality=abcdefg&general=abcdefghij&emptype=a&payperiod=a& |
Maybe they think you're exaggerating because you are. You know your numbers include what the feds pay, right? You pay $78 for yourself per pay period, and for a family it would be $195.30. And that's for a "high" HMO, which is not "very basic." That is much less than what most of us in the private sector pay, just for your information. I'm not saying you have dirt-cheap insurance, but the general perception that feds have cheaper healthcare than those in the private sector is, in fact, true. |
While PP did state a higher rate than she is paying, you provide no backup for the bolded statement. In fact I doubt you can back it up as there as so many different plans for federal employees and SO MANY private employers. As an ancedote - I pay more as a fed. |
I'm asking what YOU pay, not the total including what your employer pays for you. My husband works for a private company. He pays $400 out of his pay which is 26 times a year. His employer pays the rest. this is for a family. |
|
I pay more than DH used to pay 5 years ago, but it's really impossible to compare today and 5 years ago.
I consider fed coverage very good and affordable. I think that better and cheaper options are more of an exception than the rule. |
True, I am not citing data, though it may be out there. I pay much more for much worse coverage now at a Fortune 500 company. My husband's coverage and costs at another F500 company are even worse than mine. And to the PP who mentioned what her husband paid 5 years ago, she is right that there is no comparison. My rates at my company have tripled in the past five years. On the other hand, when a worked at a non-profit trade association more than five years ago, I had a great deal on insurance. Ultimately I stand by my belief that feds have much cheaper health care than those with large, for-profit private-sector employers, though as I said I don't think their rates are dirt-cheap. |
Here's a study by the CBO showing that on average, the benefits earned by federal civilian employees were worth 48 percent more than the benefits earned by private-sector employees with certain similar observable characteristics. |
| Sorry. Here it is: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/42921. |
|
Another one, focused on health insurance premiums (look at comparison of employee contribution): http://meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st435/stat435.pdf
|
Thanks for the cite. I paid less when I worked for a non-profit (god knows how a non-profit is able to provide such great benefits) but I'm overall satisfied with my federal benefits. We do actually pay more than the general public thinks though.... |
The link doesn't work. |
oops, never mind, just had to delete the period at the end that got included with the link and it works. |
Agreed. I'm actually not unhappy with my health benefits, but I'm an attorney so I make a lot less than my private sector friends. That being said, I can't complain because I made the choice to sacrifice pay for more reasonable hours. I'm just frustrated about this widespread belief that we get free healthcare, paid maternity leave, fancy trainings/parties, galore. And the belief that we're overpaid on top of it all. |
The healthcare is definitely much cheaper than at a law firm, or at least it was for me. Agree that it was a huge paycut though. |