Another sex offender still working with MCPS

[Anonymous]

I wouldn't want him working at the bus depot either. What if he installed a camera under seats and was upskirting girls?

[Anonymous]

I can not believe there are posters here who think he deserves a job within a system that he abused. Gotta love America. Rob a convenience store and you go to jail for 10yrs. Sexual assaults. No jail and you keep your job.

[Anonymous]

MCPS teacher here. I don't think he should be able to work for the school system in any capacity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

+1. I wouldn't care if he had a job fixing Greyhound buses at the Greyhound depot or working in a warehouse or whatever, but in a school system (any capacity)? Absolutely not.

I honestly don't understand the difference between fixing Greyhound buses at the Greyhound depot and school buses at the school bus depot.

From the link posted.

Last November, Montgomery County Police arrested Joshua Greenberg, 29, of Montgomery Village, for spying on teenage girls as they changed in a locker room at Herbert Hoover Middle School in Potomac. Greenberg, who was a janitor at the school, entered a physical education office where he peered through a window with blinds. A group of half-clothed girls saw Greenberg's furtive glances and immediately notified school leaders. Upon reviewing school surveillance cameras, detectives saw the 29-year-old entering the private office around the time of the incident.
During police questioning, Greenberg fessed up to the crime and admitted he was "sexually aroused [and] attracted while watching the victims change."


Read more: http://www.wjla.com/articles/2014/11/convicted-peeping-tom-re-arrested-for-molesting-family-dog-still-employed-by-mcps-109340.html#ixzz3KR4MO1Nc
Follow us: @ABC7News on Twitter | WJLATV on Facebook

Dude apparently was peeping in on middle school students and raised enough attention to himself to get his ass arrested.

If you are so enamoured by this guy, why not hire him to babysit your teen daugther so the rest of us can make sure he does not have access to our kids.

This is the problem with all of you that live in the world of gray with blurred lines. You think it's okay if he is working on buses at a depot, but in 5 years when he transfers to another job and the next person in charge does not examine his record and he hurts a child... then the handwringing starts and you can't unmolest a child.

Funny, how our schools have a zero tolerance for student violence but idiots will defend a pervert like this. There are a hundreds of jobs he can work outside of MCPS, it's not the only employer in the county.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

+1. I wouldn't care if he had a job fixing Greyhound buses at the Greyhound depot or working in a warehouse or whatever, but in a school system (any capacity)? Absolutely not.

I honestly don't understand the difference between fixing Greyhound buses at the Greyhound depot and school buses at the school bus depot.

From the link posted.

Last November, Montgomery County Police arrested Joshua Greenberg, 29, of Montgomery Village, for spying on teenage girls as they changed in a locker room at Herbert Hoover Middle School in Potomac. Greenberg, who was a janitor at the school, entered a physical education office where he peered through a window with blinds. A group of half-clothed girls saw Greenberg's furtive glances and immediately notified school leaders. Upon reviewing school surveillance cameras, detectives saw the 29-year-old entering the private office around the time of the incident.
During police questioning, Greenberg fessed up to the crime and admitted he was "sexually aroused [and] attracted while watching the victims change."


Read more: http://www.wjla.com/articles/2014/11/convicted-peeping-tom-re-arrested-for-molesting-family-dog-still-employed-by-mcps-109340.html#ixzz3KR4MO1Nc
Follow us: @ABC7News on Twitter | WJLATV on Facebook

Dude apparently was peeping in on middle school students and raised enough attention to himself to get his ass arrested.

If you are so enamoured by this guy, why not hire him to babysit your teen daugther so the rest of us can make sure he does not have access to our kids.

This is the problem with all of you that live in the world of gray with blurred lines. You think it's okay if he is working on buses at a depot, but in 5 years when he transfers to another job and the next person in charge does not examine his record and he hurts a child... then the handwringing starts and you can't unmolest a child.

Funny, how our schools have a zero tolerance for student violence but idiots will defend a pervert like this. There are a hundreds of jobs he can work outside of MCPS, it's not the only employer in the county.

+1,000,000!!!

[Anonymous]

Look - The creep was molesting his family dog.

I'd say that's enough to keep him away from ANY living creature.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't want him working at the bus depot either. What if he installed a camera under seats and was upskirting girls?

This.

I can't believe there are posters who think it's NBD that this guy is working for the school system.

There is definitely a difference between working at the Greyhound Bus Depot, and working for the school system with possible access to kids.

Thanks for posting this OP and bringing these issues to our attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't want him working at the bus depot either. What if he installed a camera under seats and was upskirting girls?

This.

I can't believe there are posters who think it's NBD that this guy is working for the school system.

There is definitely a difference between working at the Greyhound Bus Depot, and working for the school system with possible access to kids.

Thanks for posting this OP and bringing these issues to our attention.

But he could install a camera under the seats of a Greyhound bus too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't want him working at the bus depot either. What if he installed a camera under seats and was upskirting girls?

This.

I can't believe there are posters who think it's NBD that this guy is working for the school system.

There is definitely a difference between working at the Greyhound Bus Depot, and working for the school system with possible access to kids.

Thanks for posting this OP and bringing these issues to our attention.

There is NO POSSIBLE ACCESS TO KIDS unless its at a mall or in his own neighborhood. Is it too hard to figure that out? He works in a damned garage miles from any school. He does not drive a bus. He cleans the damned building. The longer hours he works the more time he is away from children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't want him working at the bus depot either. What if he installed a camera under seats and was upskirting girls?

This.

I can't believe there are posters who think it's NBD that this guy is working for the school system.

There is definitely a difference between working at the Greyhound Bus Depot, and working for the school system with possible access to kids.

Thanks for posting this OP and bringing these issues to our attention.

There is NO POSSIBLE ACCESS TO KIDS unless its at a mall or in his own neighborhood. Is it too hard to figure that out? He works in a damned garage miles from any school. He does not drive a bus. He cleans the damned building. The longer hours he works the more time he is away from children.

He victimized CHILDREN in the very system that pays him!

Do you THINK some corporation would keep a pervert in a position if he sexually harassed a colleague?

Why would MCPS think to keep him on? . . . unless someone is protecting him - And we know that happens.

[Anonymous]

He is no longer in the MCPS directory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't want him working at the bus depot either. What if he installed a camera under seats and was upskirting girls?

This.

I can't believe there are posters who think it's NBD that this guy is working for the school system.

There is definitely a difference between working at the Greyhound Bus Depot, and working for the school system with possible access to kids.

Thanks for posting this OP and bringing these issues to our attention.

But he could install a camera under the seats of a Greyhound bus too.

And if he got caught, the police would go after him, versus in MCPS where you can just change jobs for a while.

With this man's record, he should not be working in a public school system. For that matter, he shouldn't be working at an animal shelter either. He has issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't want him working at the bus depot either. What if he installed a camera under seats and was upskirting girls?

This.

I can't believe there are posters who think it's NBD that this guy is working for the school system.

There is definitely a difference between working at the Greyhound Bus Depot, and working for the school system with possible access to kids.

Thanks for posting this OP and bringing these issues to our attention.

There is NO POSSIBLE ACCESS TO KIDS unless its at a mall or in his own neighborhood. Is it too hard to figure that out? He works in a damned garage miles from any school. He does not drive a bus. He cleans the damned building. The longer hours he works the more time he is away from children.

He victimized CHILDREN in the very system that pays him!

Do you THINK some corporation would keep a pervert in a position if he sexually harassed a colleague?

Why would MCPS think to keep him on? . . . unless someone is protecting him - And we know that happens.

This.

What in the world is PPs issue? Why do you feel the need to protect this man, and defend MCPS in this particular situation?

[Anonymous]

There is NO POSSIBLE ACCESS TO KIDS unless its at a mall or in his own neighborhood. Is it too hard to figure that out? He works in a damned garage miles from any school. He does not drive a bus. He cleans the damned building. The longer hours he works the more time he is away from children.

What in the world is PPs issue? Why do you feel the need to protect this man, and defend MCPS in this particular situation?

s

I can tell you what is PP's issue. PP is either a pedophile or related to someone who is a pedophile. No one in their right mind would think a man who was CONVICTED of peeping and had these issues should be employed by the school system.

It's very unfair to all MCPS employees who take protecting our children very seriously to place scum like this in their midst.

http://www.gazette.net/article/20141126/NEWS/141129367/former-janitor-was-given-different-job-at-mcps-after-peeping-tom&template=gazette

On Oct. 28 of this year, Greenberg’s probation officer reported to police that Greenberg failed a polygraph test required as part of his therapy. Greenberg reportedly told the polygraph administrator that he had molested his dog multiple times since July, according to charging documents.

[Anonymous]

Another day, another MCPS perv slipping in and out of jobs. I am just beyond disgusted at this school system. Really, a huge let down from what I thought it could be.