She said 45 years old, carried a baby to term and delivered a healthy child. Why is it only on the Internet that I hear about someone's Grandmother or Aunt Sally or relatives from the Dust Bowl who gave birth to a baby at 48 and now that kid is doing great things for the world?? Are you guys really buying all of that? Also, that link is to a blog. And people can post anything they want and be anyone they want on a blog. I am talking actual objective medical facts here. Backed up by theoretical medical evidence. Not some anonymous people in cyberspace. |
I'm PP at 8:23 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8828432 - 79 identified cases, meaning 0.63 of all live births at hospital; only three of the 79 were assisted conception. High incidence of complications, but most babies were term, and no incidence of maternal death. Perinatal mortality rate 1.3%, which is high. Another one from Australia: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/13/80 Incidence of pregnancy in women over 45 0.1-0.16% of all live births. Again, higher complication rate - they didn't find deaths in the perinatal period statistically significant. Again, odds aren't great but they are certainly not zero. For women who are normally careful about birth control, I'd say enough to be concerned and take a pregnancy test. |
My mom had me at 42 (turned 43 the next month) in 1972. It was a scandal on my street. The neighbors said all kinds of crazy things. We'll 4 years later one of those women got pregnant at 46! She was not trying and nothing was wrong with the baby. |
WTF!? That is a load of crap-O-la!!! |
Sounds like you had fun
|
What are you talking about??? OP asked about odds of getting pregnant at 45 and never said anything about carrying a baby to term and delivering a healthy child. |
+1 this is true. I did some similar research. There are no documented cases for women over 45. Many of you have anecdotes regarding a 43 year old grandmother. this is not the same. We also discussed this at great length in one of my classes at college. There was an overwhelming consensus in the class about this subject. |
I agree. This is theoretical AND totally factual information here. I am quite shocked that there are posters on here that are trying to argue with this information. Of course you will always have people who will claim they "knew" someone who had that miracle baby during menopause who came out healthy, etc. But don't believe everything you read online. Or you may also believe that woman a few weeks ago who had that third breast. Wow. Just wow.
It is virtually impossible for a woman who is forty-five to get pregnant naturally (no medical assistance at all), using her own fertilized eggs (not frozen), carry a baby full-term to forty weeks and give birth to that baby w/no health problems at a healthy birth rate. Impossible. |
| Tell that to my 50-something year old aunt, born to my grandmother at 46. Her oldest daughter was pregnant at the same time. |
Are you unable to read? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8828432 This is a peer-reviewed article in a OB-GYN magazine citing documented cases. |
| Georgia Bitzis Pooley |
exactly. I think what some of the posters are confusing is that their aunts, etc used someone else's eggs. anyone can say their great grandmother had a baby after age 45 - i have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. |
You know donor eggs are a very new phenomena, right? My grandmother who had my dad at 45 certainly didn't use them. I didn't use them to have my dd at 44. Did you not see the study pp linked to? Why is it so hsrd to believe a woman can have a baby at 45? It's certainly not common, but it's definately not impossible. I'm not sure why the fact that you don't personally know anyone who did is more valid than the evidence from posters who do. |
This is bullshit. I posted above that I neighbor had a baby at 46. I knew the daughter they had and she's a healthy young woman. Do you think other posters are making these stories up? |