so you believe there was light on the first day but the sun wasn't created until the third day? |
They don't always, but in Protestant denominations or non-denominational churches, they are often linked. Even though almost no one follows the Bible literally, many people think they do, or claim to, and those are usually the most conservative. |
I bet pp interprets Genesis metaphorically |
I believe in creation and natural selection . I do not yet believe species have turned into different species as their is no proof of it and their should be. |
| There |
| Unitarians are not Christians. |
No, I believe in it literally. God operates outside of time, time is a constructed created for Man, something we can understand in our human existence, God is Spirit, and operates outside of that construct. Yes, I believe in what you would probably call the 'supernatural". There is a level of physical existence, natural laws, and there is a higher plane of Spiritual existence that supercedes natural law. They can both exist. |
You seem to have a personal religion, that includes, but is not limited to, biblical literalism |
It is the Christian religion, and the Bible does not say anything different than what I said. |
but it seems that you add to it, on your own, without any guidance from the God in the Christian bible. Where in the bible does it say that God operates outside of time and where does it say anything about evolution? |
2 Peter 3:8 "But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day." |
That's the Bible's statement of evolution? |
|
Here's the thing I don't get about Christians who read the Bible literally: If you follow the Bible, then you *know* God uses metaphors -- Jesus uses them over and over again in the New Testament. So I don't get why it seems like a Big Heretical Thing to say that elements of the Old Testament could be metaphor as well.
Also, if you know the history of the assembly of the bible, you know it was assembled by people. I'm sure they prayed over their choices, but the fact that they had various councils and debates over which books to include implies there wasn't perfect unanimity -- which you would think there would be, if God was giving direct input into the final selection. So there's definitely some room for error there, I think (unlike, say, the Quran, which claims to be the verbatim word of God, as recited by Gabriel). |
|
I believe in creationism and natural selection, but not evolution. There is no evidence of mutations becoming new species. There is lots of evidence of natural selection weeding out mutation and strengthening within species . Lots of holes and weird unexplainable fossil evidence that contradicts all of it but always ignored.
Contradictory evidence means we have really no idea what the actual sequence of events was and how it all came to be. For some reason , scientists can't tolerate being potentially ignorant and they become really biased and kind of dumb. |
I suggest you take a look in the mirror. |