I don't agree with this. If you look at the overall numbers, most white children in DC attend private. |
But I think that percentage is falling, as gentrifiers are sending their kids to DCPS and charters. |
| you really believe once the tinkering starts that there won't be 'fine-tuning'? |
| None of these options will lead to an exodus WOTP. This area will still have great ES and MS options. The major issue is HS if Wilson goes city wide. Recall the idea that lots of highly educated white people would send their kids to Wilson is less than 5 years old - and still not something the majority of WOTP families are comfortable with. This will have a minor if at all measurable impact on real estate prices. |
I don't agree with this either. There will not be another white flight. I live in Ward 3 and actually think all of the doomsday scenarios and threats are just laughable. I know no one wants to hear it but we are going to have to give a little bit. Instead of making threats, it might be better come up with tweaks to Option B and present it. |
Do you live wotp? I think many people now do plan to send their kids to Wilson and will change that if the school is city wide lottery. |
| Option B is a great scenario for ward B and we should support it and let dcps get on with it already. |
Maybe in theory. Maybe a handful of people buy into the projects. But this is not the trend in SF. I have a close relative (who also happens to be a real estate broker) with a child in San. Fran. public schools. She said that middle class famlies either move to the 'burbs, go parochial or charter. Her friends are all gone from SFPS. The city wide lottery did not work in SF. People (rich, poor, in between) want neighborhood schools. Noone wants their young children bused to another part of the city for kindergarten. What has worked in SF is the infusion of assistance to low income schools. She mentioned a program in our equivalent of "title 1 schools" (not sure if they use the same terms.) where they hold class size down to about 15 students along with other supports to families (tutoring, after care, meals, etc). It's working. Help the kids in ways that will make them successful....shuffling kids around the city won't work for many reasons, including the fact that UMC families don't have to allow their kids to be shuffled, they will opt out. |
Some highly educated white people have been sending their kids to Wilson all along - the ones who live in Ward 3 in those expensive houses and people on the Hill and other desirable places outside of ward 3. A bunch of other Ward 3 parents -- much wealthier, in many cases, send their kids to the several private schools, also conveniently located in ward 3 - for proximity to the families they serve. Most parents, regardless of wealth, prefer near-by preferably walkable schools for their kids, whether public or private. Some parents are willing to send their kids long distances for a good education, but it's hard to imagine the success of a plan that requires most parents to do this. |
| what is WOTP? |
West of the Park - i.e. rock creek park. There is plenty of desirable real estate EOTP (get it?) but all real-estate WOTP is desirable. |
|
[i]Folks- option B gives people in any ward a choice. Choose where you live and that will be your school.
Yes, kids should choose where they live so they can get a decent education. Even better, kids should choose not to be poor. Problem solved. |
| What will option b mean for overcrowding problem at ward 3 es, deal and Wilson? These are excellent schools but seriously under threat because too many kids want to go to these good schools. |
What is your solution, busing? |
Unbelievable! Option B sucks. All the options do. I'm not supporting the least sucky option. I'd rather leave things as is and start over with more competent people at the helm. |