What is going on in Arizona?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Governor Brewer just vetoed the gay discrimination bill.

Good for her. Do you think she's going to get shunned by the right now?

No. Many of us on the right thought she should - many members of Congress on the right told her she should veto it. There will be some "fringe" people who are upset, but they are in the minority.

Any data to back that up? It looks like it was a party line vote in AZ. That sounds like more than fringe support.

It may have been initially, but some of the ones who voted for it were calling for a veto. So were members of Congress (not the AZ state congress).
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/02/26/arizona-gov-jan-brewer-jets-home-amid-furor-over-bill-allowing-denial-service/
http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/20140224arizona-gop-senators-sb-1062-ask-brewer-veto.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On this one point, I'm with Putin: I have no problem with gays, so long as they leave the kids alone.

And what evidence do you have that "the gays" are targeting children for some nefarious purpose? Being gay does not make anyone a pedophile, and there is plenty of evidence that gay couples who adopt make excellent parents.

My thoughts on your "siding with Putin" would invoke Godwin's Law, so I'll just ask if you really understand who/what you're "siding" with?

Of course, not all gays are pedophiles and not all pedophiles are gay. But there still is an undeniable correlation. Look at all of the priest abuse scandals.

There is actually a far less chance that a gay man will molest children than a straight one. Take your ignorant hate elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Governor Brewer just vetoed the gay discrimination bill.

Good for her. Do you think she's going to get shunned by the right now?

No. Many of us on the right thought she should - many members of Congress on the right told her she should veto it. There will be some "fringe" people who are upset, but they are in the minority.

Any data to back that up? It looks like it was a party line vote in AZ. That sounds like more than fringe support.

It may have been initially, but some of the ones who voted for it were calling for a veto. So were members of Congress (not the AZ state congress).
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/02/26/arizona-gov-jan-brewer-jets-home-amid-furor-over-bill-allowing-denial-service/
http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/20140224arizona-gop-senators-sb-1062-ask-brewer-veto.html

What a joke , right? The Teatards vote for the bill, then they urge Brewer to veto it. That way they can tell their loony-fringe supporters they voted for it at fundraisers, even though they never wanted it to pass.

[Anonymous]

I thunk out of both houses, only three asked her to veto it. Not exactly a major change of heart.

[Anonymous]

OP, I grew up in Arizona and most of my family is there. For as long as I have known it, it has been very conservative, pro-gun, pro property rights, etc. Barry Goldwater is a hero. This is nothing new.
But, the Alliance Defense Fund is headquartered in Scottsdale. I think they (and similar) have done a lot of work getting state legislators elected and are currently feeding the climate for these hotbed conservative issues. My parents attend one of the many mega churches in AZ and the ADF use these churches to spew their rhetoric to the masses.