|
Please, if this is the best DC has to offer, then keep your homes. I prefer something along these lines, an architectural beauty with a pedigree.
http://www.californiamoves.com/property/details/3096323/MLS-22175415/1188-Hillcrest-Pasadena-CA-91106.aspx?utm_campaign=OLDP-Zillow&utm_source=zillow&utm_medium=oldp&utm_content=listing |
looks bad on the outside |
That's horrible! If I spent $8m on something to live in, it would never be something that old! I would demand modern amenities, floor plan, ceiling height, at least three levels, etc. Some may prefer a work of art, but for me, a home as to be first and foremost practical and comfortable. Form has to follow the function in a home for me. I understand that others may get a lot of enjoyment out of the artistic aspects of their home to the point that it dominates over other considerations. Not me. A home has to fit the way I want to live first. After that basic requirement is satisfied, it can then be styled and embellished. |
Perhaps more modern is to your taste. Here is a total gut and addition to an old stone cottage, with all the modern amenities -- and a relative bargain priced below the DC options listed above. http://www.8oakknollterrace.com/ |
| It's so stupid to see people discuss and argue about the homes they would never in their lifetime will be able to afford. |
Speak for yourself about the discussing houses part, not about the affording them. I personally like to see the postings people have offered with their dream homes, whether or not they can ever afford them. It's so aspirational! |
Speak for yourself. |
This. I would never spend $8+million on a house in this area--I just don't want what that buys you here. However, I could happily spend a cool $2-3 million on a house here and another $3-5 million for something on the Massachusetts or Rhode Island coast. |