Wow. I am late to this dog fight but interesting responses. While debate the pros/cons about this, no one can dsipute the fact taht the videos in the link truly reflect the culture of this school. I suspect that is what the OP was driving at with regard to the original posting. Later postings have made it clear..."this school ain't for faint at heart conservative!" |
|
OP, you already know that schools have different cultures. You already know what Swarthmore's culture is like, because it was you who posted the video.
So what exactly are you looking for here? Not info, apparently. Are you hoping we'll all jump on the bandwagon and condemn Swarthmore? Ain't gonna happen. |
Troll Alert |
It's a black eye for the school. Makes them all look likea bunch of pampered liberal hypocrites who don't believe in free speech. |
Or St. Mary's in Maryland since it didn't fill its freshman class. |
Because you like being challenged, you call troll. Classy. If you're not OP, then you tell us what OP is expecting to get out of a thread where OP lays out all the facts right at the start. |
| Love Swarthmore and every Swattie I've ever met. But then I went to Bryn Mawr, so I may as well get those little devil horn implants, right? |
Wait - they were exercising their own right to free speech. You look like a conservative hypocrite for whining about it. |
| This was not Swarthmore's finest moment; a small minority of students mischaracterized Zoellick's involvement in the Iraq War while ignoring his many years of public service. Other students then spoke up in defense of Zoellick -- http://daily.swarthmore.edu/2013/04/11/op-ed-open-letter-to-robert-zoellick-75/ -- , but, unfortunately, the damage had been done. That said, however, OP's whole-cloth dismissal of student activism -- "I thought that was over in the '60s" --is pathetic and un-American: the exercise of free speech through non-violent protest is a fundamental right of all Americans. Throughout our history such action has galvanized our country to fight injustic and violence. In the '60s student protestors helped end Jim Crow and the Vietnam War, in the '70s they stirred Americans to accept responsibility for protecting our environment, and in the '80s they pushed colleges and universities to divest their assets in South Africa and thus to help end apartheid. I hope that our American tradition of speaking out isn't over. |
| DH and I went to top Ivies. Honestly, we always thought of Swarthmore as a junior women's college -- like a Pine Manor for Quakers. |
Then you were misinformed because it has been co-ed since it was founded in 1864. You are thinking of Skidmore. |
You mean Pine Mattress? |
| Look folks. You don't want a liberal college? Don't go to one. No one is forcing you to attend a college you don't want to attend. What is your purpose of your post other than blowing air? |
|
I went to Haverford. Swarthmore was our local rival, but as good academically as Haverford (and Bryn Mawr) are, Swarthmore was better, more selective but also more intense.
These sorts of protests happen all the time and have for decades. This one just happened to be particularly viral. If your dc is looking at slacs, this shouldn't discourage him/her. |
|
Swarthmore does not tolerate diversity of thought/opinions or freedom of speech:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324216004578483080076663720.html |