Which didn't stop the anti-2.0 "MCPS is deliberately holding back my advanced student to close the achievement gap!" people from jumping right in. |
Why is MCPS trying to weaken the strong in elementary and middle school by eliminating pathways for seeking a challenging math curriculum? Do they want these children, too, to fail or are they simply trying to hold them back (since these are not their own children) to close the achievement and performance gap in the County? Very troubling. Even if students do not study 3/4 should not fail an exam after one whole year of studying the subject and taking cumulative quizzes, tests and exams up to this point ... not in algebra or mathematics. Why didn't the system know well ahead of time they would have > 50% flunk rate? Are MCPS math teachers that incompetent...yet we continue to give them raises in this economy? |
...the words of an illiterate, uneducated, unschooled and foolish bigot. Tell us how the knowledge of the spoken American language by those speaking several languages affect the scores and performance on an Algebra or other higher mathematics examination? What a pathetic fool. No wonder the children from non-English speaking nations do better than Americans on the international math and English language examinations (PISA). |
Precisely, the arrogant teachers and MCPS leadership (2 billion dollar waste) can't teach. The excellent and high performing self-motivated students (from self motivated families) excel not because of MCPS. These students will do well ( and do) despite MCPS, MCPS teachers, elimination of math pathways, or curriculum 2.0. In fact, if you eliminate completely MCPS these students will strive and excel. MCPS should stop bragging about their system that stands on the broad shoulders of self-motivated students and their families. Some of these teachers in the high performing schools should go teach in the lowest performing schools. Then and only then we will find out who can really teach from the majority riding on the coattails of bright students. |
Arrogant bureaucratic MCPS leadership that can't refrain from telling the very families and their children, who prop up the national reputation of the system, they do not know what they are talking about when it comes to appropriate desires for a challenging curriculum. Parents no nothing about what their children need because they think their kids are all gifted. It appears Mr. Starr, your teachers can't teach math! What other subjects can't they teach? ...science? |
Interesting. MCPS has been saying that they think kids were getting over accelerated in earlier grades leading to issues later on. The failure rates on finals for HS math up to pre-calc range from 63 to 47%. Now people are freaking out that they're removing some of the acceleration options. It seems to me that MCPS was probably right. The options they are putting in place still allow Calculus during the junior year for talented math students. Do they really need more than that? IMO, math above that level should really be taught in college. |
+1 I am not sure when it became so politically correct to embrace and pay for illegal aliens but there is no denying they are eating the taxes going toward the average legal child's education. |
Fact #1: a lot of the children you probably consider "illegal aliens" are US citizens. Fact #2: "illegal aliens" also pay taxes. |
Shorter PP: Yes, I know that this shows there is a problem for the non-advanced children, but I want to talk about my problem! |
Why? |
Your point is??? |
This happens more often that you think. If your kids need a tutor or fails exams as they progress in math, don't blame MoCo. |
Now, MCPS is going to blame this significant flunk rate on over acceleration? It will be interesting to see if applying the brakes with curriculum 2.0 will reverse this miserable performance in its track. |
PP, MCPS has been saying that kids were getting over-accelerated, leading to problems later on. MCPS is not saying that this is the cause of the flunk rate among the kids who were not accelerated, either appropriately or over-. |
Because the peer group and number of kids taking a class would be much bigger. I've also read numerous times that these college level courses that kids are taking aren't really college level. Many good colleges no longer offer college credit. Even if they do skip taking them in college they'll probably be at a disadvantage. |