Why the silence here on Dorner?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

    Subject: Why the silence here on Dorner?
Anonymous



Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
The right is finally relieved that its not one of their fold for once.


Neither was the Tucson shooter or the Aurora shooter.

Both were very hardcore republicans. It just that the media refuses to talk about it.

Actually, the Tucson shooters friends describe him as a Dem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://chicksontheright.com/posts/item/23801-support-for-christopher-dorner-increases

There are no names in this link.

Did you watch the vid? Is Channel 13 liying?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lapierre and the republicans holds him as a model NRA member and a hero. I hear republicans are aiding him.

Link?

Oh, that's rich. The poster that can't name one liberal who supports Dorner despite starting this thread claiming that liberals support him wants a link. Haven't you set the precedent that posters can just make shit up? No links, no proof, no evidence are necessary. Just pull stuff out of your ass.

Except for the fact that the links I provides shows liberals who support Dorner. You just want liberals with household names. Why? Are those the only ones you identify with?

Liar. Your links did not include a single name. It is impossible to tell who the posters were. It may have been you posting for all we know. Also, I asked for the name of any liberal.

You know, you post here a lot. Do you really want to have the reputation of being a buffoon with no interest in the truth? Do you really want to be like Panty Sniffer and considered just another right-wing clown that everyone ignores?

Do you really think you are accomplishing anything with this sort of thread other than ruining your own reputation?

Did you research who those twitter people were posting? Are you suggesting that Malkin made them up?

Bolded shows the liberal left's tolerance towards viewpoints other then their own. No surprise there.

I read the Tweets to which you linked Apparently you didn't. Had you done so, you would have seen that none of the Tweets were from named individuals. They were all from pseudonyms. As such, it is impossible to know who the authors are or what their political views might be.

My intolerance is not for differing views, but for unsupported lies that do nothing but clog the forum with garbage. If you want to claim that liberals support Dorner, then give an example of a liberal who supports him. Don't give examples of made-up Twitter accounts.

You clearly do want to join the Panty Sniffer league. Sadly, you actually lack Panty Sniffer's panache.

[Anonymous]

In a move that is even stunning for the NRA, a speaking offer has been made to former LAPD officer Christopher Dorner to speak at the next NRA convention.
The decision has many inside the organization questioning the overall impact it will have on their current negative publicity.
RIGHT: Former officer and future NRA spokesman Chris Dorner.
Wayne Lapierre has spoken to many members of the executive board and has fully endorsed this decision. His apparent lack of sensitivity for fellow human beings is driven by his desire to show that guns don’t kill, people kill people.
Several members of the executive board have already expressed their approval of Dorner’s speaking engagement based on the fact that he is reported to have used a weapon that would be considered an “assault” category firearm. Legendary rocker, and pro-death activist Tedd Nugent is reportedly among those who are very interested in hearing Mr. Dorner’s thoughts on violence in America and what can be done to prevent it.
Security recommendations have been submitted to the board to ensure the security of Mr. Dorner should he accept this offer. Those with close knowledge of the situation have said that it appears they are treating this very seriously since many in law enforcement have taken a dim view of Mr. Dorner’s recent activities. They have not seen security this tight since the release of the last Solomon Rushdie novel on Scientology.
The next national convention for the NRA is scheduled and there are many of us hoping that it may very well be their last.

http://glossynews.com/society/crime/201302090111/roque-la-officer-chris-dorner-proposed-nra-speaker/

Republicans, nut jobs to the end!

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:
http://glossynews.com/society/crime/201302090111/roque-la-officer-chris-dorner-proposed-nra-speaker/

Republicans, nut jobs to the end!

You realize that is satire, right? Sort of like Michelle Malkin, except that it's intentionally satire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It's the anarchists who like him. Total opposite of nanny state-loving liberals.

Yeah, sorta like the old Occupy Wallstreet crowd. They were so popular in this forum oh about 2 years ago. I kind of miss all the theads that were posted here that were defending them. Now OWS has been erased from everyone's collective memories just like Cindy Sheehan and closing Gitmo.

I think you meant "just like the Tea Party".

Tea Party is quite active. You can thank us afterwards.

Oh, we are aware that wingnuts are "quite active", just not "relevant".

Anyway we thank you for the entertainment you provide as the grownups in the Republican party squash you out of sheer frustration.

Are you totally not interested in any sort of personal freedom?

Of course I am. Is it so incredible to you that many people do not believe the Tea Party is really pro-freedom?

[Anonymous]

As a member, I can assure you the Tea Party is VERY pro-freedom. We also realize that y'all see your freedom in government control. We recognize how tragic that would be, that a limited government is the key to individual freedom.

As I said, you can thank us later.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lapierre and the republicans holds him as a model NRA member and a hero. I hear republicans are aiding him.

Link?

Oh, that's rich. The poster that can't name one liberal who supports Dorner despite starting this thread claiming that liberals support him wants a link. Haven't you set the precedent that posters can just make shit up? No links, no proof, no evidence are necessary. Just pull stuff out of your ass.

Except for the fact that the links I provides shows liberals who support Dorner. You just want liberals with household names. Why? Are those the only ones you identify with?

Liar. Your links did not include a single name. It is impossible to tell who the posters were. It may have been you posting for all we know. Also, I asked for the name of any liberal.

You know, you post here a lot. Do you really want to have the reputation of being a buffoon with no interest in the truth? Do you really want to be like Panty Sniffer and considered just another right-wing clown that everyone ignores?

Do you really think you are accomplishing anything with this sort of thread other than ruining your own reputation?

Did you research who those twitter people were posting? Are you suggesting that Malkin made them up?

Bolded shows the liberal left's tolerance towards viewpoints other then their own. No surprise there.

I read the Tweets to which you linked Apparently you didn't. Had you done so, you would have seen that none of the Tweets were from named individuals. They were all from pseudonyms. As such, it is impossible to know who the authors are or what their political views might be.

My intolerance is not for differing views, but for unsupported lies that do nothing but clog the forum with garbage. If you want to claim that liberals support Dorner, then give an example of a liberal who supports him. Don't give examples of made-up Twitter accounts.

You clearly do want to join the Panty Sniffer league. Sadly, you actually lack Panty Sniffer's panache.

Not so. There were plenty of real people there. You just want to see the likes of Matt Damon listed among the ranks, in other words, names you recognize, because the individual in this country isn't important to lefties; they are more interested in communalism.

What a sad statement, the bolded is. Is this a reflection of who you really are, that you need to resort to personal insults in order to get your point across?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:
Not so. There were plenty of real people there. You just want to see the likes of Matt Damon listed among the ranks, in other words, names you recognize, because the individual in this country isn't important to lefties; they are more interested in communalism.

What a sad statement, the bolded is. Is this a reflection of who you really are, that you need to resort to personal insults in order to get your point across?

Okay, this will be real easy to settle. Post one name. Just one. One real name. Put up or shut up.

[Anonymous]

What a sad statement, the bolded is. Is this a reflection of who you really are, that you need to resort to personal insults in order to get your point across?

Yoda is a crazy wingnut? Who knew?

[Anonymous]

Some of you are beyond pathetic.

Do you have lives that do not entail finding a political angle to every situation and news story in the world?

You can find support for any nut job or idea out there. The problem is when our actual elected leaders start spewing the shit that only adds fuel to the fire.

JSteele correctly asked for you to give a name of one prominent liberal, progressive, democrat who supports this guy and all you post are trolls who are no different from most of you if you think about it.

I think it goes without saying that what this guy is doing is beyond wrong and it goes without saying that a thread on this forum dedicated to him isnt necessary because we can assume that its universally accepted that Dorner is wrong period.

Im all up for political debate, but some of you guys are losers who cant talk regular topics like the weather, grammys or sports without invoking politics as if all our lives are consumed that way. get the hell out the house once in a while and stop roaming internet sites and listening to talk radio.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Not so. There were plenty of real people there. You just want to see the likes of Matt Damon listed among the ranks, in other words, names you recognize, because the individual in this country isn't important to lefties; they are more interested in communalism.

What a sad statement, the bolded is. Is this a reflection of who you really are, that you need to resort to personal insults in order to get your point across?

Okay, this will be real easy to settle. Post one name. Just one. One real name. Put up or shut up.

Do you believe tat Malkin and other conservatives made up these tweets to paint the left in a bad light?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Some of you are beyond pathetic.

Do you have lives that do not entail finding a political angle to every situation and news story in the world?

You can find support for any nut job or idea out there. The problem is when our actual elected leaders start spewing the shit that only adds fuel to the fire.

JSteele correctly asked for you to give a name of one prominent liberal, progressive, democrat who supports this guy and all you post are trolls who are no different from most of you if you think about it.

I think it goes without saying that what this guy is doing is beyond wrong and it goes without saying that a thread on this forum dedicated to him isnt necessary because we can assume that its universally accepted that Dorner is wrong period.

Im all up for political debate, but some of you guys are losers who cant talk regular topics like the weather, grammys or sports without invoking politics as if all our lives are consumed that way. get the hell out the house once in a while and stop roaming internet sites and listening to talk radio.

Ordinary citizens vote. Therefore their opinion counts

[Anonymous]

From Dorner's "manifesto":

"Cyclist, I have no problem sharing the road with you. But, at least go the fucking speed limit posted or get off the road!!! That is a feasible request. Livestrong you fraudulent assholes."

Obviously Dorner is a right-wing asshole who hates on bicyclists.

(http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/conscience-realist/2013/feb/9/chris-dorner-manifesto-cop-turned-wanted-murderer-/)

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Not so. There were plenty of real people there. You just want to see the likes of Matt Damon listed among the ranks, in other words, names you recognize, because the individual in this country isn't important to lefties; they are more interested in communalism.

What a sad statement, the bolded is. Is this a reflection of who you really are, that you need to resort to personal insults in order to get your point across?

Okay, this will be real easy to settle. Post one name. Just one. One real name. Put up or shut up.

https://mobile.twitter.com/TrentTheArtist/tweets