Why the silence here on Dorner?

[Anonymous]

http://chicksontheright.com/posts/item/23801-support-for-christopher-dorner-increases

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lapierre and the republicans holds him as a model NRA member and a hero. I hear republicans are aiding him.

Link?

Oh, that's rich. The poster that can't name one liberal who supports Dorner despite starting this thread claiming that liberals support him wants a link. Haven't you set the precedent that posters can just make shit up? No links, no proof, no evidence are necessary. Just pull stuff out of your ass.

Except for the fact that the links I provides shows liberals who support Dorner. You just want liberals with household names. Why? Are those the only ones you identify with?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The right is finally relieved that its not one of their fold for once.

Neither was the Tucson shooter or the Aurora shooter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It's the anarchists who like him. Total opposite of nanny state-loving liberals.

Yeah, sorta like the old Occupy Wallstreet crowd. They were so popular in this forum oh about 2 years ago. I kind of miss all the theads that were posted here that were defending them. Now OWS has been erased from everyone's collective memories just like Cindy Sheehan and closing Gitmo.

I think you meant "just like the Tea Party".

Tea Party is quite active. You can thank us afterwards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It's the anarchists who like him. Total opposite of nanny state-loving liberals.

Yeah, sorta like the old Occupy Wallstreet crowd. They were so popular in this forum oh about 2 years ago. I kind of miss all the theads that were posted here that were defending them. Now OWS has been erased from everyone's collective memories just like Cindy Sheehan and closing Gitmo.

I think you meant "just like the Tea Party".

Tea Party is quite active. You can thank us afterwards.

Oh, we are aware that wingnuts are "quite active", just not "relevant".

Anyway we thank you for the entertainment you provide as the grownups in the Republican party squash you out of sheer frustration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The right is finally relieved that its not one of their fold for once.

Neither was the Tucson shooter or the Aurora shooter.

Yeah, a guy shoots a Democrat but is somehow apolitical.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lapierre and the republicans holds him as a model NRA member and a hero. I hear republicans are aiding him.

Link?

Oh, that's rich. The poster that can't name one liberal who supports Dorner despite starting this thread claiming that liberals support him wants a link. Haven't you set the precedent that posters can just make shit up? No links, no proof, no evidence are necessary. Just pull stuff out of your ass.

Except for the fact that the links I provides shows liberals who support Dorner. You just want liberals with household names. Why? Are those the only ones you identify with?

Liar. Your links did not include a single name. It is impossible to tell who the posters were. It may have been you posting for all we know. Also, I asked for the name of any liberal.

You know, you post here a lot. Do you really want to have the reputation of being a buffoon with no interest in the truth? Do you really want to be like Panty Sniffer and considered just another right-wing clown that everyone ignores?

Do you really think you are accomplishing anything with this sort of thread other than ruining your own reputation?

[Anonymous]

    Subject: Why the silence here on Dorner?
Anonymous



Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
The right is finally relieved that its not one of their fold for once.


Neither was the Tucson shooter or the Aurora shooter.

Both were very hardcore republicans. It just that the media refuses to talk about it.

[Anonymous]

NRA members are helping the guy out. Just like they helped Olympic bomber. Dorner is in a NRA/repukican safe house. They do not want to lose another of their heros to the FBI...like the guy who killed the schoolbus driver.

[Anonymous]

No comment. He's another lunatic. Does that deserve discussion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:http://chicksontheright.com/posts/item/23801-support-for-christopher-dorner-increases

There are no names in this link.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Yes, the previous poster is correct. OP, can you identify one well-known liberal, or even one barely known liberal that has supported Dorner? A few anonymous Twitter accounts don't prove anything.

No liberal can support the murder of an innocent women and her fiancé regardless of the legitimacy of the killer's complaints about the LAPD.

Yet
They
Are

NO
THEY
AREN'T.

So the people on Twitter making these comments are not liberals?

Anarchists are not liberals.

Liberal= Big government
Conservative = Small government
Anarchist = No government

I'm a nihilist. Where do I fit into this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Yes, the previous poster is correct. OP, can you identify one well-known liberal, or even one barely known liberal that has supported Dorner? A few anonymous Twitter accounts don't prove anything.

No liberal can support the murder of an innocent women and her fiancé regardless of the legitimacy of the killer's complaints about the LAPD.

Yet
They
Are

NO
THEY
AREN'T.

So the people on Twitter making these comments are not liberals?

Anarchists are not liberals.

Liberal= Big government
Conservative = Small government
Anarchist = No government

I'm a nihilist. Where do I fit into this?

If you are a nihilist, then why would you care?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lapierre and the republicans holds him as a model NRA member and a hero. I hear republicans are aiding him.

Link?

Oh, that's rich. The poster that can't name one liberal who supports Dorner despite starting this thread claiming that liberals support him wants a link. Haven't you set the precedent that posters can just make shit up? No links, no proof, no evidence are necessary. Just pull stuff out of your ass.

Except for the fact that the links I provides shows liberals who support Dorner. You just want liberals with household names. Why? Are those the only ones you identify with?

Liar. Your links did not include a single name. It is impossible to tell who the posters were. It may have been you posting for all we know. Also, I asked for the name of any liberal.

You know, you post here a lot. Do you really want to have the reputation of being a buffoon with no interest in the truth? Do you really want to be like Panty Sniffer and considered just another right-wing clown that everyone ignores?

Do you really think you are accomplishing anything with this sort of thread other than ruining your own reputation?

Did you research who those twitter people were posting? Are you suggesting that Malkin made them up?

Bolded shows the liberal left's tolerance towards viewpoints other then their own. No surprise there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It's the anarchists who like him. Total opposite of nanny state-loving liberals.

Yeah, sorta like the old Occupy Wallstreet crowd. They were so popular in this forum oh about 2 years ago. I kind of miss all the theads that were posted here that were defending them. Now OWS has been erased from everyone's collective memories just like Cindy Sheehan and closing Gitmo.

I think you meant "just like the Tea Party".

Tea Party is quite active. You can thank us afterwards.

Oh, we are aware that wingnuts are "quite active", just not "relevant".

Anyway we thank you for the entertainment you provide as the grownups in the Republican party squash you out of sheer frustration.

Are you totally not interested in any sort of personal freedom?