Ryan-Aiken social conservatism and anti-science

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:nutty eastern intellectuals don't even realize that the existence of homosexuals disproves evolution and natural selection as homosexuality would be the first trait eliminated from the gene-pool.

Homosexualism is not hereditary and is spontaneous. That means that it can happen in any offspring without being genetically carried from generation to generation. There are many traits and genetic disorders that continue to manifest spontaneously without any genetic factors and they do not seem to be evolutionary dead ends. I think you need Genetics 101 to understand that your postulation above has no basis in fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They can but they don't. And they would disappear from the gene pool as fast as a group of men with one testicle.

And yet male babies are still born with one testicle. They have not disappeared either. So how do you explain that?

It's called a birth defect

So is sickle cell, unless you happen to live in a malaria area. And then it keeps you from dying. Funny how nature knows more than wingnuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:nutty eastern intellectuals don't even realize that the existence of homosexuals disproves evolution and natural selection as homosexuality would be the first trait eliminated from the gene-pool.

Homosexualism is not hereditary and is spontaneous. That means that it can happen in any offspring without being genetically carried from generation to generation. There are many traits and genetic disorders that continue to manifest spontaneously without any genetic factors and they do not seem to be evolutionary dead ends. I think you need Genetics 101 to understand that your postulation above has no basis in fact.

.

Which is excellent evidence that evolution and natural selection is a fraud. Name me another trait that suppresses sexual breeding that is passed along over the eons without being removed or diminished? Foolish feelings.....not science.

[Anonymous]

It is also excellent evidence of creationism since these traits are "spontaneously" created. Total stupidity , unscientific and feelings based.

[Anonymous]

You can't face what science says about homosexuals or differences in racial intelligence so you invent fake belief systems resembling religion to your feelings. That's science to silly and dumb liberals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You can't face what science says about homosexuals or differences in racial intelligence so you invent fake belief systems resembling religion to your feelings. That's science to silly and dumb liberals.

Compassion is good. Nothing wrong with it....but spare me the joke of liberals love of science....please!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:nutty eastern intellectuals don't even realize that the existence of homosexuals disproves evolution and natural selection as homosexuality would be the first trait eliminated from the gene-pool.

Homosexualism is not hereditary and is spontaneous. That means that it can happen in any offspring without being genetically carried from generation to generation. There are many traits and genetic disorders that continue to manifest spontaneously without any genetic factors and they do not seem to be evolutionary dead ends. I think you need Genetics 101 to understand that your postulation above has no basis in fact.

.

Which is excellent evidence that evolution and natural selection is a fraud. Name me another trait that suppresses sexual breeding that is passed along over the eons without being removed or diminished? Foolish feelings.....not science.

One of the reasons that genes for homosexuality are adaptive is that they make both men and women promiscuous with males. The mothers of male homosexuals have more sex and more children than mothers with only straight sons. The gene makes both women and men have more sex with guys. Even if if results in some male children who don't reproduce, the overall boost to reproduction in females means that it selected for, not against.

http://www.medicaldaily.com/articles/10287/20120613/homosexuality-gene-mother-reproduction-evolution.htm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:nutty eastern intellectuals don't even realize that the existence of homosexuals disproves evolution and natural selection as homosexuality would be the first trait eliminated from the gene-pool.

Homosexualism is not hereditary and is spontaneous. That means that it can happen in any offspring without being genetically carried from generation to generation. There are many traits and genetic disorders that continue to manifest spontaneously without any genetic factors and they do not seem to be evolutionary dead ends. I think you need Genetics 101 to understand that your postulation above has no basis in fact.

.

Which is excellent evidence that evolution and natural selection is a fraud. Name me another trait that suppresses sexual breeding that is passed along over the eons without being removed or diminished? Foolish feelings.....not science.

That's easy. Menopause. It is very uncommon in the animal kingdom. In our case it ensures that familial resources are not spread among too many offspring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:nutty eastern intellectuals don't even realize that the existence of homosexuals disproves evolution and natural selection as homosexuality would be the first trait eliminated from the gene-pool.

Homosexualism is not hereditary and is spontaneous. That means that it can happen in any offspring without being genetically carried from generation to generation. There are many traits and genetic disorders that continue to manifest spontaneously without any genetic factors and they do not seem to be evolutionary dead ends. I think you need Genetics 101 to understand that your postulation above has no basis in fact.

.

Which is excellent evidence that evolution and natural selection is a fraud. Name me another trait that suppresses sexual breeding that is passed along over the eons without being removed or diminished? Foolish feelings.....not science.

That's easy. Menopause. It is very uncommon in the animal kingdom. In our case it ensures that familial resources are not spread among too many offspring.

Another awesome evidence of creationism!!! Common only among Gods favorites and adverse to evolution!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:nutty eastern intellectuals don't even realize that the existence of homosexuals disproves evolution and natural selection as homosexuality would be the first trait eliminated from the gene-pool.

Homosexualism is not hereditary and is spontaneous. That means that it can happen in any offspring without being genetically carried from generation to generation. There are many traits and genetic disorders that continue to manifest spontaneously without any genetic factors and they do not seem to be evolutionary dead ends. I think you need Genetics 101 to understand that your postulation above has no basis in fact.

.

Which is excellent evidence that evolution and natural selection is a fraud. Name me another trait that suppresses sexual breeding that is passed along over the eons without being removed or diminished? Foolish feelings.....not science.

One of the reasons that genes for homosexuality are adaptive is that they make both men and women promiscuous with males. The mothers of male homosexuals have more sex and more children than mothers with only straight sons. The gene makes both women and men have more sex with guys. Even if if results in some male children who don't reproduce, the overall boost to reproduction in females means that it selected for, not against.

http://www.medicaldaily.com/articles/10287/20120613/homosexuality-gene-mother-reproduction-evolution.htm

This is delicious! Now there are homosexual genes and the other liberal "scientist" says it is a spontaneous trait! So if it is a gene how yall scientists feel about the choice of aborting gay fetuses based on the gay gene! Make sure your answer is scientific !

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:nutty eastern intellectuals don't even realize that the existence of homosexuals disproves evolution and natural selection as homosexuality would be the first trait eliminated from the gene-pool.

Homosexualism is not hereditary and is spontaneous. That means that it can happen in any offspring without being genetically carried from generation to generation. There are many traits and genetic disorders that continue to manifest spontaneously without any genetic factors and they do not seem to be evolutionary dead ends. I think you need Genetics 101 to understand that your postulation above has no basis in fact.

.

Which is excellent evidence that evolution and natural selection is a fraud. Name me another trait that suppresses sexual breeding that is passed along over the eons without being removed or diminished? Foolish feelings.....not science.

One of the reasons that genes for homosexuality are adaptive is that they make both men and women promiscuous with males. The mothers of male homosexuals have more sex and more children than mothers with only straight sons. The gene makes both women and men have more sex with guys. Even if if results in some male children who don't reproduce, the overall boost to reproduction in females means that it selected for, not against.

http://www.medicaldaily.com/articles/10287/20120613/homosexuality-gene-mother-reproduction-evolution.htm

This is delicious! Now there are homosexual genes and the other liberal "scientist" says it is a spontaneous trait! So if it is a gene how yall scientists feel about the choice of aborting gay fetuses based on the gay gene! Make sure your answer is scientific !

It's hard to justify aborting babies for healthy, normal traits like gender or sexual orientation. Since being gay is not a defect, and we are not going to practice eugenics, the answer is a big no. And for the record, ethics not science answers moral questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:nutty eastern intellectuals don't even realize that the existence of homosexuals disproves evolution and natural selection as homosexuality would be the first trait eliminated from the gene-pool.

Homosexualism is not hereditary and is spontaneous. That means that it can happen in any offspring without being genetically carried from generation to generation. There are many traits and genetic disorders that continue to manifest spontaneously without any genetic factors and they do not seem to be evolutionary dead ends. I think you need Genetics 101 to understand that your postulation above has no basis in fact.

.

Which is excellent evidence that evolution and natural selection is a fraud. Name me another trait that suppresses sexual breeding that is passed along over the eons without being removed or diminished? Foolish feelings.....not science.

One of the reasons that genes for homosexuality are adaptive is that they make both men and women promiscuous with males. The mothers of male homosexuals have more sex and more children than mothers with only straight sons. The gene makes both women and men have more sex with guys. Even if if results in some male children who don't reproduce, the overall boost to reproduction in females means that it selected for, not against.

http://www.medicaldaily.com/articles/10287/20120613/homosexuality-gene-mother-reproduction-evolution.htm

This is delicious! Now there are homosexual genes and the other liberal "scientist" says it is a spontaneous trait! So if it is a gene how yall scientists feel about the choice of aborting gay fetuses based on the gay gene! Make sure your answer is scientific !

It's hard to justify aborting babies for healthy, normal traits like gender or sexual orientation. Since being gay is not a defect, and we are not going to practice eugenics, the answer is a big no. And for the record, ethics not science answers moral questions.

So now people have to justify why they get an abortion? This dumb republican has you liberals finally getting it!

[Anonymous]

What has been established in this thread is that static numbers of homosexuals in the population disproves the basic tenents of evolution. Nobody has any idea how matter and life were created and anybody who acts like they are sure is an idiot. Creationism can never explain the scientific origin of existence but at least it is logical. And life... Please, a primordial soup struck by lightening ? All the elements are available... Make life geniuses! You can't ....? Ok bring a dead fish back to life.. All the ingredients are there! You can't ? Why not? Because you have no idea what you are talking about that's why. Humans are too advanced too have evolved this much so quickly . There is no doubt that natural selection takes place but evolution is not the framework or overriding blueprint. The creationists are closer to the actual truth. The gays prove it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:nutty eastern intellectuals don't even realize that the existence of homosexuals disproves evolution and natural selection as homosexuality would be the first trait eliminated from the gene-pool.

Homosexualism is not hereditary and is spontaneous. That means that it can happen in any offspring without being genetically carried from generation to generation. There are many traits and genetic disorders that continue to manifest spontaneously without any genetic factors and they do not seem to be evolutionary dead ends. I think you need Genetics 101 to understand that your postulation above has no basis in fact.

.

Which is excellent evidence that evolution and natural selection is a fraud. Name me another trait that suppresses sexual breeding that is passed along over the eons without being removed or diminished? Foolish feelings.....not science.

One of the reasons that genes for homosexuality are adaptive is that they make both men and women promiscuous with males. The mothers of male homosexuals have more sex and more children than mothers with only straight sons. The gene makes both women and men have more sex with guys. Even if if results in some male children who don't reproduce, the overall boost to reproduction in females means that it selected for, not against.

http://www.medicaldaily.com/articles/10287/20120613/homosexuality-gene-mother-reproduction-evolution.htm

This is delicious! Now there are homosexual genes and the other liberal "scientist" says it is a spontaneous trait! So if it is a gene how yall scientists feel about the choice of aborting gay fetuses based on the gay gene! Make sure your answer is scientific !

It's hard to justify aborting babies for healthy, normal traits like gender or sexual orientation. Since being gay is not a defect, and we are not going to practice eugenics, the answer is a big no. And for the record, ethics not science answers moral questions.

So now people have to justify why they get an abortion? This dumb republican has you liberals finally getting it!

No, you asked me what we would choose. For a dumb republican, you sure seem excited about choice. Progress!

[Anonymous]

What is the origin of "ethics" ? Popular vote? 5 guys vote to rape 4 girls is that ethical? What makes your ethics better than hitlers? That you won the war? Ethics come from the ten commandments that's where and humanity should thank God for the divine decency they permeate civilization with.