You are a sock puppet, nana, nana, nana! Dude, when you reply to your own post, nobody believes that you had forgotten about what you just posted. Idiot. |
If that kind of woman hate is ok for a president then why not a rep? |
Mr. Sockpuppet: Is it your position that there is nothing wrong with what Akin said? |
No.... It's that until liberals hold a former president and speaker at the upcoming convention accountable for blatant abuse of women then they should shut their big pie holes concerns those who haven't met the high standard of woman hate Clinton set. Especially when they are way below presidential level. It's just common sense and logic. |
Was Clinton convicted of this supposed rape? \ |
No he settled the case of cornering and pulling down his pants so that the ( trailer trash...democrat word) victim wouldn't describe distinguishing features on the presidents penis. The reason he perjured himself and lost his law liscence was to avoid the contributory evidence of the intern sex in the oval office. He already had the Kathleen Willey cornering and Juanita Broderick rape allegations. An obvious predator of his subordinates, he settled the case and accepted losing his law liscence and getting impeached. A real woman hater is launching the democrat convention. |
I think it was the presidential sperm stain and the distinguishing features that cornered the predator in chief. |
so because dem's "supported" bill clinton raping someone, nobody in the party can speak to how bad rape is or point a finger at akin for having such a warped and absurd mindset?
just for shits and giggles, ill concede to you PP that clinton raped that woman. hell, ill go even further and concede that clinton probably raped several since it was alleged it happened several times to several women. i still believe what Akin said was complete bat shit because any of those women clinton raped could have gotten pregnant if he didnt use protection. so whats your argument now? |
Great analogy, and very scary. |
Exactly. This isn't about whether a democrat or republican male can be an a**hole and sexually assault women. It's that no democrat candidate is going on national TV and saying that the woman who is assaulted could somehow magically "shut down" her becoming pregnant as a result of the assault, and therefore women don't really get pregnant as a result of rape, and therefore abortion should be denied even in cases of rape. |
This is not a democrat vs. republican issue. The issue here is how the hell did a man make it through 65 years of life on this earth believing that women have a special rape detector that shuts down pregnancy and that oh, it's probably a good idea to go say this on national TV? There is an upside, he significantly reduced (one would hope eliminated) his chances of election. |
And it raises several obvious questions: 1. Why do the anti-choice crowd think women who get pregnant unexpectedly "deserve" to have to raise the child? Why don't they feel the same way about the father - even if he is rapist? It's just as much his kid as it is hers. If she doesn't want it, why not dump it on the father? That never seems to happen, does it? 2. How many of these GOP thugs would force their own daughter to carry a rape-induced pregnancy to term? |
The argument is that Clinton is giving the speech at the upcoming convention to intriduce President Obama and that it proves that democrats couldn't care less about women since they are putting a obvious predator and woman hater up on a pedestal for all to cheer. Unless they ask Clinton not to appear out of respect to women, then they are being silly to even discuss lesser issues of anti-woman behavior. |
This is not the day for Republicans to start calling anyone "silly" over women's issues. You only have one foot left to shoot. |