Yes, this is the way I feel as well. I am American because I happened to be born here. Not sure why I'd be "proud" of that. It sure beats some other places though, so in that sense I feel lucky to be here. |
I'm the same way. After being told those ridiculous conspiracy theories (yes, the 9/11 one, too) and experiencing hatred for America abroad, I feel more protective of America and cherish my American identity even more. |
The Founders made no such requirement and no such requirement exists. Two well-known examples of presidential candidates who were born outside the US include John McCain -- born in Panama -- and George Romney (Mitt's dad) - born in Mexico. The "natural born citizen" requirement applies to those born outside the US to US citizen parents. |
Please elaborate because I'm confused. I also thought the President had to be born on US soil. Why would the requirements be more stringent for children of US citizens than for others? What I read from your statement is that you have to be born on US soil if your parents are US citizens but that you don't have to if they're not, which doesn't make any sense. |
If you are born in the US, you are a US citizen.
If one of your parents is a US citizen, you are a US citizen regardless of where you are born. My husband was born overseas but his mother was a US citizen (and met residency requirements) and so he was also a US citizen. |
I don't think there has ever been a definitive decision by SCOTUS on the meaning of native-born. Born on US soil is the standard understanding, I think, with a general expectation that someone born to US parents overseas probably being acceptable, especially if the parents were serving the country, and even more so if, like McCain, it was in US controlled territory. I don't recall much questioning being done about George Romney, but I assume someone would have raised it if he had gotten closer to the nomination. Since natus is the Latin word for born, I would assume "natural born" meant citizen by birth rather than naturalization, but as I said, I am not aware of any definitive ruling. Please correct me if I have misstated anything. |
+1 |
I'm proud to be an American.
I'm not proud of the American government. Those who cloak themselves in self-absorbed labelling as "patriots" (e.g., Palin & her ilk) are often the ones who least represent the ideals behind the country to begin with. |
Canadian poster here- So let me get this straight. It's okay to be loyal to one country over the other, as long as its the USA? Otherwise it's appalling? Ok... This is part of the reason why I don't identify as an American. I feel like the US thinks they are the centre of the universe, the only country that matters. |
|
I wish my kid had been born in Switzerland. Guess we can't have everything in life. But to answer the OP, yes most times I am proud to be an American. However there are times when I am not. Perfect example was when I was visiting in Europe at the time of the USA invasion of Iraq, when people asked me a question about the invasion, I declared I was from Toronto. |
|
In fact, our wonderful country made those rules. So happy you're getting to reap the benefits of living in the US and having dual citizenship! Congratulations! |
Yeah, I mean, the people against gay marriage and all the conservatives who clearly hate America and it's bedrock principles really drive me nuts. |
|