Romney has peaked. It's all downhill from here

[Anonymous]

the 2008 giant has been awakened again. get ready for death panels, 500 billion in medicare cuts tossing grannie over the cliff, you will lose your helthcare and be put into death panel healthcare. The economy sucks , debt, downgrade , foodstamps, unemployment. Democrats running for office will not even mention Obamacare....no matter how you spin it, this really helps the GOP in the elections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the 2008 giant has been awakened again. get ready for death panels, 500 billion in medicare cuts tossing grannie over the cliff, you will lose your helthcare and be put into death panel healthcare. The economy sucks , debt, downgrade , foodstamps, unemployment. Democrats running for office will not even mention Obamacare....no matter how you spin it, this really helps the GOP in the elections.

I disagree. This law is aimed squarely at the solidly middle class. They are the ones who stand to benefit the most from it. They are already benefitting in many ways, and you really shouldn't discount that people don't like having benefits taken away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the 2008 giant has been awakened again. get ready for death panels, 500 billion in medicare cuts tossing grannie over the cliff, you will lose your helthcare and be put into death panel healthcare. The economy sucks , debt, downgrade , foodstamps, unemployment. Democrats running for office will not even mention Obamacare....no matter how you spin it, this really helps the GOP in the elections.

Oh holy hell you won't find any support if you are one of those death panel nutjobs. And if you think Romney was itching to debate Romneycate vs Obamacare you must have the kool aid running on an IV drip. I hope the death panel doesn't take it away...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thankfully he doesn't have to tee up any issues (he isn't the sitting president). Any Rs who were a bit uncertain of Romney -- like me, will be running to the polls in Nov. to deal with Obamacare.

Thank you Justice Roberts! I can't help but think he knew exactly what he was doing.

Oh yes, everyone seems to think they know what Roberts was doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Poor mitt, he has been hoping that the Supreme Court was going to take issues off of his plate. They have bounced him on Immigration, and now on Health Care. Eventually the public is going to demand that he say what he is doing on these, and for that matter they are going to want more on the economy than "I ran Bain Capital".

He doesn't want to answer these questions. He has been hoping to attack Obama without proposing anything. That plan isn't going to get him to the end of the contest.

In your dreams. I voted for Obama but never again. He is an amateur who hasn't learned a damn thing while in office. Four more years of this guy and the country wil go down the drain. People vote their pocketbooks and this means they will vote for Romney.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor mitt, he has been hoping that the Supreme Court was going to take issues off of his plate. They have bounced him on Immigration, and now on Health Care. Eventually the public is going to demand that he say what he is doing on these, and for that matter they are going to want more on the economy than "I ran Bain Capital".

He doesn't want to answer these questions. He has been hoping to attack Obama without proposing anything. That plan isn't going to get him to the end of the contest.

In your dreams. I voted for Obama but never again. He is an amateur who hasn't learned a damn thing while in office. Four more years of this guy and the country wil go down the drain. People vote their pocketbooks and this means they will vote for Romney.

But Romney's ideas tear the middle class apart. Why would they vote for that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor mitt, he has been hoping that the Supreme Court was going to take issues off of his plate. They have bounced him on Immigration, and now on Health Care. Eventually the public is going to demand that he say what he is doing on these, and for that matter they are going to want more on the economy than "I ran Bain Capital".

He doesn't want to answer these questions. He has been hoping to attack Obama without proposing anything. That plan isn't going to get him to the end of the contest.

In your dreams. I voted for Obama but never again. He is an amateur who hasn't learned a damn thing while in office. Four more years of this guy and the country wil go down the drain. People vote their pocketbooks and this means they will vote for Romney.

You never voted for Obama. Stop faking it.

[Anonymous]

There is a big difference between a State enacting a similar insurance mandate and the federal government doing so. Many disagree with the ACA because it is an overreaching of federal power. Just because Romney did something similar in his State is not, on its face, contradictory to his opposition of the ACA.

The fact that it didn't work in Massachusetts should have people scratching their heads and wondering why the federal government believes it will work now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is a big difference between a State enacting a similar insurance mandate and the federal government doing so. Many disagree with the ACA because it is an overreaching of federal power. Just because Romney did something similar in his State is not, on its face, contradictory to his opposition of the ACA.

The fact that it didn't work in Massachusetts should have people scratching their heads and wondering why the federal government believes it will work now.

The highest court disagrees with you.

[Anonymous]

Rev up the tea party!!!! Here we go !!!!i

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is a big difference between a State enacting a similar insurance mandate and the federal government doing so. Many disagree with the ACA because it is an overreaching of federal power. Just because Romney did something similar in his State is not, on its face, contradictory to his opposition of the ACA.

The fact that it didn't work in Massachusetts should have people scratching their heads and wondering why the federal government believes it will work now.

I think romney ended up having to do it in MA because MA is very liberal and a lot of people were tying to pass something crazy like single payer. Romney struck a deal to not throw MA into a single payer program.

[Anonymous]

People vote their pocketbooks

WHAT? Totally wrong, or no poor people or middle-class people would be voting Republican.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a big difference between a State enacting a similar insurance mandate and the federal government doing so. Many disagree with the ACA because it is an overreaching of federal power. Just because Romney did something similar in his State is not, on its face, contradictory to his opposition of the ACA.

The fact that it didn't work in Massachusetts should have people scratching their heads and wondering why the federal government believes it will work now.

The highest court disagrees with you.

Doesn't change the fact that many people believe the federal government to be overreaching here. And many do not view Romney's opposition as a contradiction. I am equally as scared to have Obama in for another 4 years as I am to have Romney take office. This is not an election I am looking forward to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Romney can just dismantle implementation and stop enforcing tax law like Obama doesn't enforce immigration.

You realize that there have been record numbers of deportations under Obama right?

Where? Certainly not in Montgomery or Fairfax counties...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Romney can just dismantle implementation and stop enforcing tax law like Obama doesn't enforce immigration.

You realize that there have been record numbers of deportations under Obama right?

Where? Certainly not in Montgomery or Fairfax counties...

The truth is the truth. Not only that, but he increased customs agents by 30% and border patrol agents by 50%. If you only get your news from Rupert Murdoch owned properties, this is probably complete news to you. How on earth could they spin it?