NCIVF - Is it just a marketing tactic?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Studies like this make me want to consider it even more: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/04/23/fertility-drugs-link-childhood-leukaemia_n_1446326.html#s806707


Thanks for the link. The article is not very well written, though.

"Children conceived naturally after their mothers waited more than a year to get pregnant had a 50% greater-than-normal likelihood of developing ALL."

this is unclear - what does that even mean? It could define 3/4 of the world's population. "waited" on purpose? took them that long to conceive? Does a miscarriage in that year reset the clock?
Anonymous
Seriously what does that mean?
post reply Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: