Racist Republicans Flocking to Cain

[Anonymous]

In a sense one does justify the other, but only in one direction. White discrimination has disadvantaged blacks in the US since before it was the US. For blacks not to react with resentment would be superhuman. To resent the resentment, on the other hand, is a denial of history.

Bravo. Modern liberalism in a nutshell! It is not who you are inside or even what your background is. It is just the color of your skin or sex and some skin colors and sexes deserve more than others... to say otherwise is just a denial of history.

The OP points out that Cain a black man has moved to top of republican candidates which I would think some liberals might find a bit surprising and we are given links to dubious studies pointing out that republicans are more racist than liberals, are told won't ever really vote for a black candidate for president and lectures about how blacks are justified to have more grievances that whites. Really great post racial stuff here. Keep it up.

[Anonymous]

In a sense one does justify the other, but only in one direction. White discrimination has disadvantaged blacks in the US since before it was the US. For blacks not to react with resentment would be superhuman. To resent the resentment, on the other hand, is a denial of history.

Bravo! Modern victim Liberalism in a nutshell! It is not who you are inside or your even your background. It is just the color of your skin or sex that is important and some skin colors and sexes deserve more than others and to deny that is too deny history.

[Anonymous]

When you actually are oppressed PP let us know. And no people hating you for being an ass does not count.

[takoma]

Anonymous wrote:

In a sense one does justify the other, but only in one direction. White discrimination has disadvantaged blacks in the US since before it was the US. For blacks not to react with resentment would be superhuman. To resent the resentment, on the other hand, is a denial of history.

Bravo! Modern victim Liberalism in a nutshell! It is not who you are inside or your even your background. It is just the color of your skin or sex that is important and some skin colors and sexes deserve more than others and to deny that is too deny history.

On the contrary, my point is that nobody deserves more than others just because of skin color or sex, or sexual orientation either. That's why I think it is a normal human response to resent having less. Wanting equality is not a demand for special treatment. And denying that some have received less is a denial of history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

In a sense one does justify the other, but only in one direction. White discrimination has disadvantaged blacks in the US since before it was the US. For blacks not to react with resentment would be superhuman. To resent the resentment, on the other hand, is a denial of history.

Bravo! Modern victim Liberalism in a nutshell! It is not who you are inside or your even your background. It is just the color of your skin or sex that is important and some skin colors and sexes deserve more than others and to deny that is too deny history.

Modern conservatism: discriminate against people for generations. Then when the court makes it illegal, pretend like it never happened and accuse anyone who remembers that they are the racists. Political gaslighting.

[Anonymous]

Rasmussen: Cain 43, Obama 41

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/2012_presidential_matchups

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Rasmussen: Cain 43, Obama 41

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/2012_presidential_matchups

Damn racists. Voting en bloc now.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Rasmussen: Cain 43, Obama 41

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/2012_presidential_matchups

Damn racists. Voting en bloc now.

I assume you are aware of the difference between voting and giving an opinion to a pollster? On second thought, that may be a bad assumption. Get back to me when Cain wins the nomination.

[Anonymous]

Twas a jest.