Was the DC earthquake really an earthquake?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After reading this thread, I am going to:

1. Stop laughing.

2. Immediately buy stock in companies that produce survival gear, tin foil, the DSM-IV and medications that treat mental disorders.

3. Hope to God more than half of you are being sarcastic, and my internet radar isn't sufficiently caffinated to pick up on it.

4. Hope to God I don't know the rest of you.

Thank you for stopping by. Your comment was invaluable to our discussion. Now, would you mind going back to the General Parenting and Nanny boards where I'm sure you're very missed right now?

That you think this is a serious discussion is the funniest thing yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple physics says that this was not a nuclear detonation. We don't have a warhead capable of shaking the earth all the way to Maine.

How do you know this? Who cares what simple physics says?

Isn't it possible that advanced technology has been hidden from the masses?

How many have even scanned some of the CIA FOIA documents related to aliens?
http://www.foia.cia.gov/ufo.asp
Browse through the document list.

Notice the number of cases deleted.

The earth cares what simple physics says. I think the question is who cares what a bunch of conspiracy theorists say?

Inject a bunch of water into the fault line dam a river nearby, or strip mine a huge amount of earth on one side of the fault and pile it up on the other. There's a plausible basis for building a conspiracy theory.

[Anonymous]

So you put your faith in a government that spends this much on war - http://costofwar.com/en/ - all in the name of "freedom?"

And people who are the least bit interested in other views are labeled as nut jobs?

huh

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple physics says that this was not a nuclear detonation. We don't have a warhead capable of shaking the earth all the way to Maine.

How do you know this? Who cares what simple physics says?

Isn't it possible that advanced technology has been hidden from the masses?

How many have even scanned some of the CIA FOIA documents related to aliens?
http://www.foia.cia.gov/ufo.asp
Browse through the document list.

Notice the number of cases deleted.

The earth cares what simple physics says. I think the question is who cares what a bunch of conspiracy theorists say?

Inject a bunch of water into the fault line dam a river nearby, or strip mine a huge amount of earth on one side of the fault and pile it up on the other. There's a plausible basis for building a conspiracy theory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So you put your faith in a government that spends this much on war - http://costofwar.com/en/ - all in the name of "freedom?"

And people who are the least bit interested in other views are labeled as nut jobs?

huh

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple physics says that this was not a nuclear detonation. We don't have a warhead capable of shaking the earth all the way to Maine.

How do you know this? Who cares what simple physics says?

Isn't it possible that advanced technology has been hidden from the masses?

How many have even scanned some of the CIA FOIA documents related to aliens?
http://www.foia.cia.gov/ufo.asp
Browse through the document list.

Notice the number of cases deleted.

The earth cares what simple physics says. I think the question is who cares what a bunch of conspiracy theorists say?

Inject a bunch of water into the fault line dam a river nearby, or strip mine a huge amount of earth on one side of the fault and pile it up on the other. There's a plausible basis for building a conspiracy theory.

I put faith in science, not government.

[Anonymous]

again - huh

So what's the force behind science? as in funding?

http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/funding
I already see government mentioned three times on this page.

FDA, anyone?

And then there's big pharma, which, with its strong lobbyists, is in bed with the government.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you put your faith in a government that spends this much on war - http://costofwar.com/en/ - all in the name of "freedom?"

And people who are the least bit interested in other views are labeled as nut jobs?

huh

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple physics says that this was not a nuclear detonation. We don't have a warhead capable of shaking the earth all the way to Maine.

How do you know this? Who cares what simple physics says?

Isn't it possible that advanced technology has been hidden from the masses?

How many have even scanned some of the CIA FOIA documents related to aliens?
http://www.foia.cia.gov/ufo.asp
Browse through the document list.

Notice the number of cases deleted.

The earth cares what simple physics says. I think the question is who cares what a bunch of conspiracy theorists say?

Inject a bunch of water into the fault line dam a river nearby, or strip mine a huge amount of earth on one side of the fault and pile it up on the other. There's a plausible basis for building a conspiracy theory.

I put faith in science, not government.

[Anonymous]

oops!

How could I have overlooked NASA????

Anonymous wrote:again - huh

So what's the force behind science? as in funding?

http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/funding
I already see government mentioned three times on this page.

FDA, anyone?

And then there's big pharma, which, with its strong lobbyists, is in bed with the government.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you put your faith in a government that spends this much on war - http://costofwar.com/en/ - all in the name of "freedom?"

And people who are the least bit interested in other views are labeled as nut jobs?

huh

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple physics says that this was not a nuclear detonation. We don't have a warhead capable of shaking the earth all the way to Maine.

How do you know this? Who cares what simple physics says?

Isn't it possible that advanced technology has been hidden from the masses?

How many have even scanned some of the CIA FOIA documents related to aliens?
http://www.foia.cia.gov/ufo.asp
Browse through the document list.

Notice the number of cases deleted.

The earth cares what simple physics says. I think the question is who cares what a bunch of conspiracy theorists say?

Inject a bunch of water into the fault line dam a river nearby, or strip mine a huge amount of earth on one side of the fault and pile it up on the other. There's a plausible basis for building a conspiracy theory.

I put faith in science, not government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:oops!

How could I have overlooked NASA????

Anonymous wrote:again - huh

So what's the force behind science? as in funding?

http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/funding
I already see government mentioned three times on this page.

FDA, anyone?

And then there's big pharma, which, with its strong lobbyists, is in bed with the government.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you put your faith in a government that spends this much on war - http://costofwar.com/en/ - all in the name of "freedom?"

And people who are the least bit interested in other views are labeled as nut jobs?

huh

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple physics says that this was not a nuclear detonation. We don't have a warhead capable of shaking the earth all the way to Maine.

How do you know this? Who cares what simple physics says?

Isn't it possible that advanced technology has been hidden from the masses?

How many have even scanned some of the CIA FOIA documents related to aliens?
http://www.foia.cia.gov/ufo.asp
Browse through the document list.

Notice the number of cases deleted.

The earth cares what simple physics says. I think the question is who cares what a bunch of conspiracy theorists say?

Inject a bunch of water into the fault line dam a river nearby, or strip mine a huge amount of earth on one side of the fault and pile it up on the other. There's a plausible basis for building a conspiracy theory.

I put faith in science, not government.

Big Pharma is not government. If you dislike them that is a separate discussion. They aren't really big into Seismology.
The FDA is a regulator of industry. They don't fund or control science. Again, VERY LITTLE Seismology going on there.
NASA? Eh, they have a role, mostly remote seismology.

But the remote sensors around the world are mostly operated by university scientists. And there is no man in a black suit whisking away with printouts whenever an incident happens.

[Anonymous]

what the government didnt tell us is the moon landding really confirmed the moon was made out of cheese.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:what the government didnt tell us is the moon landding really confirmed the moon was made out of cheese.

Now you're finally getting it!!!...I've always known that cheese was alien food!!

[Anonymous]

That's right amigo. We call it queso south of the border and you gringos love it on everything!

Anonymous wrote:
Now you're finally getting it!!!...I've always known that cheese was alien food!!

[Anonymous]

Did anyone checks out the DUMBs youtube video in the original post. At around 1:36, it looks like the subway that runs between the Senate Office Buildings and the Capitol. I don't work on the Hill, so I am not sure. But if true, that is that is pure genius. No one would ever think to disguise a DUMBs as a branch of Government. Who would try to bomb that?

[Anonymous]

So, if I follow you, you're saying that the Capitol is the pinnacle of DUMB?

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone checks out the DUMBs youtube video in the original post. At around 1:36, it looks like the subway that runs between the Senate Office Buildings and the Capitol. I don't work on the Hill, so I am not sure. But if true, that is that is pure genius. No one would ever think to disguise a DUMBs as a branch of Government. Who would try to bomb that?

[Anonymous]

Wait, I already thought there were underground bunkers for top military. Where's the secret?

And, how does one bomb cause weeks of aftershocks? We had something like 7 from this past Friday to Sunday.

[Anonymous]

Big Pharma is in bed with government - just as ONE example.

How can anyone put faith in these studies after reviewing WHAT funded them?

It's so pathetic how so many think they have control over their lives. just pawns . . .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oops!

How could I have overlooked NASA????

Anonymous wrote:again - huh

So what's the force behind science? as in funding?

http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/funding
I already see government mentioned three times on this page.

FDA, anyone?

And then there's big pharma, which, with its strong lobbyists, is in bed with the government.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you put your faith in a government that spends this much on war - http://costofwar.com/en/ - all in the name of "freedom?"

And people who are the least bit interested in other views are labeled as nut jobs?

huh

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple physics says that this was not a nuclear detonation. We don't have a warhead capable of shaking the earth all the way to Maine.

How do you know this? Who cares what simple physics says?

Isn't it possible that advanced technology has been hidden from the masses?

How many have even scanned some of the CIA FOIA documents related to aliens?
http://www.foia.cia.gov/ufo.asp
Browse through the document list.

Notice the number of cases deleted.

The earth cares what simple physics says. I think the question is who cares what a bunch of conspiracy theorists say?

Inject a bunch of water into the fault line dam a river nearby, or strip mine a huge amount of earth on one side of the fault and pile it up on the other. There's a plausible basis for building a conspiracy theory.

I put faith in science, not government.

Big Pharma is not government. If you dislike them that is a separate discussion. They aren't really big into Seismology.
The FDA is a regulator of industry. They don't fund or control science. Again, VERY LITTLE Seismology going on there.
NASA? Eh, they have a role, mostly remote seismology.

But the remote sensors around the world are mostly operated by university scientists. And there is no man in a black suit whisking away with printouts whenever an incident happens.

[Anonymous]

WHAT studies are you talking about? They aren't all the same people, the same funding. That's like saying "How can you put faith in books after reading Sarah Palin's biolgraphy?"

Anonymous wrote:Big Pharma is in bed with government - just as ONE example.

How can anyone put faith in these studies after reviewing WHAT funded them?

It's so pathetic how so many think they have control over their lives. just pawns . . .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:oops!

How could I have overlooked NASA????

Anonymous wrote:again - huh

So what's the force behind science? as in funding?

http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/funding
I already see government mentioned three times on this page.

FDA, anyone?

And then there's big pharma, which, with its strong lobbyists, is in bed with the government.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you put your faith in a government that spends this much on war - http://costofwar.com/en/ - all in the name of "freedom?"

And people who are the least bit interested in other views are labeled as nut jobs?

huh

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple physics says that this was not a nuclear detonation. We don't have a warhead capable of shaking the earth all the way to Maine.

How do you know this? Who cares what simple physics says?

Isn't it possible that advanced technology has been hidden from the masses?

How many have even scanned some of the CIA FOIA documents related to aliens?
http://www.foia.cia.gov/ufo.asp
Browse through the document list.

Notice the number of cases deleted.

The earth cares what simple physics says. I think the question is who cares what a bunch of conspiracy theorists say?

Inject a bunch of water into the fault line dam a river nearby, or strip mine a huge amount of earth on one side of the fault and pile it up on the other. There's a plausible basis for building a conspiracy theory.

I put faith in science, not government.

Big Pharma is not government. If you dislike them that is a separate discussion. They aren't really big into Seismology.
The FDA is a regulator of industry. They don't fund or control science. Again, VERY LITTLE Seismology going on there.
NASA? Eh, they have a role, mostly remote seismology.

But the remote sensors around the world are mostly operated by university scientists. And there is no man in a black suit whisking away with printouts whenever an incident happens.