what is up with the trolls?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A mother just had a post I think in "off-topic" but cannot remember about how she had PPD and people on there were making fun of her or not believing her. I mean I have posted some harsh things but that takes the cake. As a woman I cannot believe someone would do that. I would call Troll there.

Telling a woman expecting her first baby to "STFU" was also shockingly harsh (in the orgasmic birth thread).

Yes I agree with you. Personally, I have no idea how it could be orgasmic but if someone thinks so then good for them. There is one woman on the CIO thread though who is calling people abusive parents for doing it. I have read alot of posts on here about the anti and pro CIO but never in my life has someone been so agressive about it. She is basically telling people that if they do it then they are ABUSIVE. I am sorry but if someone calls me a child abuser thats when I hit the fan.

That's me. I'm not calling anyone an abuser; in fact, I said parents are being told it's okay when it's not. I'm saying the mechanism of CIO -- the reason CIO works -- is EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE MECHANISM of abuse and neglect. Abused and neglected kids stop crying and so do kids whose parents use CIO -- and for the very same reason, not a different reason because the parents have different intentions. Sorry, but I'm not going to stop stating the obvious. It is about the affect on babies, not about you or your intentions (or how sensitive you are to hearing the news). Because you don't want to hear it does not make me a troll.

I seriously thought I was avoiding this psycho. She must have a million computers on with all the threads running. I am out now before I tear her ass a new one and ruin what the intention of this thread was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A mother just had a post I think in "off-topic" but cannot remember about how she had PPD and people on there were making fun of her or not believing her. I mean I have posted some harsh things but that takes the cake. As a woman I cannot believe someone would do that. I would call Troll there.

Telling a woman expecting her first baby to "STFU" was also shockingly harsh (in the orgasmic birth thread).

Yes I agree with you. Personally, I have no idea how it could be orgasmic but if someone thinks so then good for them. There is one woman on the CIO thread though who is calling people abusive parents for doing it. I have read alot of posts on here about the anti and pro CIO but never in my life has someone been so agressive about it. She is basically telling people that if they do it then they are ABUSIVE. I am sorry but if someone calls me a child abuser thats when I hit the fan.

That's me. I'm not calling anyone an abuser; in fact, I said parents are being told it's okay when it's not. I'm saying the mechanism of CIO -- the reason CIO works -- is EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE MECHANISM of abuse and neglect. Abused and neglected kids stop crying and so do kids whose parents use CIO -- and for the very same reason, not a different reason because the parents have different intentions. Sorry, but I'm not going to stop stating the obvious. It is about the affect on babies, not about you or your intentions (or how sensitive you are to hearing the news). Because you don't want to hear it does not make me a troll.

NP here, Haven't followed the CIO postings because I would never CIO with my kids. I would never call parents who do it abusive, even if on some level I believe it. There are better ways to get your point across. The way you're communicating turns people off and they are not going to listen to your message. Trollish? IDK. But certainly not effective, and sounds like your just looking to start a fight. If you really are that anti-CIO, why don't you do studies and write a book supporting your theory?

[Anonymous]

I seriously thought I was avoiding this psycho. She must have a million computers on with all the threads running. I am out now before I tear her ass a new one and ruin what the intention of this thread was.

Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? You're calling the other poster 'psycho' and refer to online exchanges as 'tear her ass a new one'.
This goes for everyone - re-read what you write before you submit and think what others would think of what you're writing. Don't be so mean. Think of these posters as actual people. Would you say that in person, with other people listening?
(I have not always typed the most PC or eloquent things, so its directed at myself as well)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A mother just had a post I think in "off-topic" but cannot remember about how she had PPD and people on there were making fun of her or not believing her. I mean I have posted some harsh things but that takes the cake. As a woman I cannot believe someone would do that. I would call Troll there.

Telling a woman expecting her first baby to "STFU" was also shockingly harsh (in the orgasmic birth thread).

Yes I agree with you. Personally, I have no idea how it could be orgasmic but if someone thinks so then good for them. There is one woman on the CIO thread though who is calling people abusive parents for doing it. I have read alot of posts on here about the anti and pro CIO but never in my life has someone been so agressive about it. She is basically telling people that if they do it then they are ABUSIVE. I am sorry but if someone calls me a child abuser thats when I hit the fan.

That's me. I'm not calling anyone an abuser; in fact, I said parents are being told it's okay when it's not. I'm saying the mechanism of CIO -- the reason CIO works -- is EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE MECHANISM of abuse and neglect. Abused and neglected kids stop crying and so do kids whose parents use CIO -- and for the very same reason, not a different reason because the parents have different intentions. Sorry, but I'm not going to stop stating the obvious. It is about the affect on babies, not about you or your intentions (or how sensitive you are to hearing the news). Because you don't want to hear it does not make me a troll.

NP here, Haven't followed the CIO postings because I would never CIO with my kids. I would never call parents who do it abusive, even if on some level I believe it. There are better ways to get your point across. The way you're communicating turns people off and they are not going to listen to your message. Trollish? IDK. But certainly not effective, and sounds like your just looking to start a fight. If you really are that anti-CIO, why don't you do studies and write a book supporting your theory?

ITA, PP. For me, someone who runs around calling other parenting methods abuse, widely studied and supported by a pediatrician no less, is like a woman who says "I am a feminist and you aren't a real woman if you don't xxxxxx" feel free to insert breastfeeding, work full-time to be a good role model to your daughters, use your Rabbit nightly for that ultra-feminist orgasm... WHATEVER.... The beauty of this life is I make my choices and you make yours. I am not going to go trolling around telling people they are stupid or *especially* abusers for their own personal choices. My life, my choices--not yours--MINE. Read some Adam Smith and then get back to us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I seriously thought I was avoiding this psycho. She must have a million computers on with all the threads running. I am out now before I tear her ass a new one and ruin what the intention of this thread was.

Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? You're calling the other poster 'psycho' and refer to online exchanges as 'tear her ass a new one'.
This goes for everyone - re-read what you write before you submit and think what others would think of what you're writing. Don't be so mean. Think of these posters as actual people. Would you say that in person, with other people listening?
(I have not always typed the most PC or eloquent things, so its directed at myself as well)

Ok pot vs. kettle! Read my initial post about the PPD woman. Then about my thoughts on the CIO post. Then see where she responding to my post...where I said nothing wrong other then the fact that I do not like being called abusive or that my actions are abusive and she came at me. This is what I hate! I did nothing wrong other then post on here and now because she came at me and attacked me on another thread with her remarks (RE READ THEM) I am to blame. I am not going to let someone come at me and call me abusive which is what she insinuated. I said I was leaving because I did not want to tear her ass a new one and I meant it because she is attacking ME. Maybe you should take your own advice and stop trolling on my posts and this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A mother just had a post I think in "off-topic" but cannot remember about how she had PPD and people on there were making fun of her or not believing her. I mean I have posted some harsh things but that takes the cake. As a woman I cannot believe someone would do that. I would call Troll there.

Telling a woman expecting her first baby to "STFU" was also shockingly harsh (in the orgasmic birth thread).

Yes I agree with you. Personally, I have no idea how it could be orgasmic but if someone thinks so then good for them. There is one woman on the CIO thread though who is calling people abusive parents for doing it. I have read alot of posts on here about the anti and pro CIO but never in my life has someone been so agressive about it. She is basically telling people that if they do it then they are ABUSIVE. I am sorry but if someone calls me a child abuser thats when I hit the fan.

That's me. I'm not calling anyone an abuser; in fact, I said parents are being told it's okay when it's not. I'm saying the mechanism of CIO -- the reason CIO works -- is EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE MECHANISM of abuse and neglect. Abused and neglected kids stop crying and so do kids whose parents use CIO -- and for the very same reason, not a different reason because the parents have different intentions. Sorry, but I'm not going to stop stating the obvious. It is about the affect on babies, not about you or your intentions (or how sensitive you are to hearing the news). Because you don't want to hear it does not make me a troll.

I seriously thought I was avoiding this psycho. She must have a million computers on with all the threads running. I am out now before I tear her ass a new one and ruin what the intention of this thread was.

Oh em gee. You just said something that sounds kind of threatening. Some people may not like that. Of course if you literally tore her ass a new one, that would be kind of gross. So I'm assuming that you wouldn't actually do that.

[Anonymous]

ITA, PP. For me, someone who runs around calling other parenting methods abuse, widely studied and supported by a pediatrician no less, is like a woman who says "I am a feminist and you aren't a real woman if you don't xxxxxx" feel free to insert breastfeeding, work full-time to be a good role model to your daughters, use your Rabbit nightly for that ultra-feminist orgasm... WHATEVER.... The beauty of this life is I make my choices and you make yours. I am not going to go trolling around telling people they are stupid or *especially* abusers for their own personal choices. My life, my choices--not yours--MINE. Read some Adam Smith and then get back to us.

LMAO!!!
Overall, well said!! ITA!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I seriously thought I was avoiding this psycho. She must have a million computers on with all the threads running. I am out now before I tear her ass a new one and ruin what the intention of this thread was.

Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? You're calling the other poster 'psycho' and refer to online exchanges as 'tear her ass a new one'.
This goes for everyone - re-read what you write before you submit and think what others would think of what you're writing. Don't be so mean. Think of these posters as actual people. Would you say that in person, with other people listening?
(I have not always typed the most PC or eloquent things, so its directed at myself as well)

Not the PP, but I think I'm gonna call you "the mommy poster" from now on. Or maybe I'll just call you Mommy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I seriously thought I was avoiding this psycho. She must have a million computers on with all the threads running. I am out now before I tear her ass a new one and ruin what the intention of this thread was.

Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? You're calling the other poster 'psycho' and refer to online exchanges as 'tear her ass a new one'.
This goes for everyone - re-read what you write before you submit and think what others would think of what you're writing. Don't be so mean. Think of these posters as actual people. Would you say that in person, with other people listening?
(I have not always typed the most PC or eloquent things, so its directed at myself as well)

Ok pot vs. kettle! Read my initial post about the PPD woman. Then about my thoughts on the CIO post. Then see where she responding to my post...where I said nothing wrong other then the fact that I do not like being called abusive or that my actions are abusive and she came at me. This is what I hate! I did nothing wrong other then post on here and now because she came at me and attacked me on another thread with her remarks (RE READ THEM) I am to blame. I am not going to let someone come at me and call me abusive which is what she insinuated. I said I was leaving because I did not want to tear her ass a new one and I meant it because she is attacking ME. Maybe you should take your own advice and stop trolling on my posts and this thread.

I haven't followed the CIO post, I'm not the anti-CIO poster. Sorry, I totally didn't know I was striking a nerve (I mean it, I'm not being snarky). What I'm was trying to convey is that you don't fight fire with fire. Maybe if more of us started choosing our words more carefully (and I pointed at myself as well) it would be a little nicer around here. I'm sorry I hit a nerve.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I seriously thought I was avoiding this psycho. She must have a million computers on with all the threads running. I am out now before I tear her ass a new one and ruin what the intention of this thread was.

Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? You're calling the other poster 'psycho' and refer to online exchanges as 'tear her ass a new one'.
This goes for everyone - re-read what you write before you submit and think what others would think of what you're writing. Don't be so mean. Think of these posters as actual people. Would you say that in person, with other people listening?
(I have not always typed the most PC or eloquent things, so its directed at myself as well)

Ok pot vs. kettle! Read my initial post about the PPD woman. Then about my thoughts on the CIO post. Then see where she responding to my post...where I said nothing wrong other then the fact that I do not like being called abusive or that my actions are abusive and she came at me. This is what I hate! I did nothing wrong other then post on here and now because she came at me and attacked me on another thread with her remarks (RE READ THEM) I am to blame. I am not going to let someone come at me and call me abusive which is what she insinuated. I said I was leaving because I did not want to tear her ass a new one and I meant it because she is attacking ME. Maybe you should take your own advice and stop trolling on my posts and this thread.

I haven't followed the CIO post, I'm not the anti-CIO poster. Sorry, I totally didn't know I was striking a nerve (I mean it, I'm not being snarky). What I'm was trying to convey is that you don't fight fire with fire. Maybe if more of us started choosing our words more carefully (and I pointed at myself as well) it would be a little nicer around here. I'm sorry I hit a nerve.

And I am the pp and completely agree with your sentiments and get what you meant. It hit a nerve not because I care about an anonymous poster but I am not disgusted that she actually came at me on another thread. In any case, I appreciate the apology and have a nice day.

[Anonymous]

sorry I mean I *am* disgusted above

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I seriously thought I was avoiding this psycho. She must have a million computers on with all the threads running. I am out now before I tear her ass a new one and ruin what the intention of this thread was.

Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? You're calling the other poster 'psycho' and refer to online exchanges as 'tear her ass a new one'.
This goes for everyone - re-read what you write before you submit and think what others would think of what you're writing. Don't be so mean. Think of these posters as actual people. Would you say that in person, with other people listening?
(I have not always typed the most PC or eloquent things, so its directed at myself as well)

Not the PP, but I think I'm gonna call you "the mommy poster" from now on. Or maybe I'll just call you Mommy.

OMG. High school flashbacks.

[Anonymous]

To the PP who wants to rip my ass a new one -- what you don't get is that I am voicing my opinion about CIO, not attacking you. You, however, are attacking me for voicing my opinion -- here and on the other thread. Did you not think I had a right to respond?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To the PP who wants to rip my ass a new one -- what you don't get is that I am voicing my opinion about CIO, not attacking you. You, however, are attacking me for voicing my opinion -- here and on the other thread. Did you not think I had a right to respond?

Ok seriously you are stalking me. Leave me alone! Does no one else see this woman really has a problem. Forget the trolling you are stalking now. I am going back to my life and hope the rest of you have a good weekend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the PP who wants to rip my ass a new one -- what you don't get is that I am voicing my opinion about CIO, not attacking you. You, however, are attacking me for voicing my opinion -- here and on the other thread. Did you not think I had a right to respond?

Ok seriously you are stalking me. Leave me alone! Does no one else see this woman really has a problem. Forget the trolling you are stalking now. I am going back to my life and hope the rest of you have a good weekend.

How can I stalk you on an anonymous forum? If you don't want me to respond to your continuing posts about me, then don't post them.