So liberals, now that you know that Obama is a terrible president and he reneged on his promises...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guess what OP, you could pretty much put that query to any liberal or conservative regarding any elected president in the past 100 or more years. Disregard the Bush stolen election, certain people were against Obama before he was elected and at least cannot be considered fair weather friends. This guy can't get out of bed in the morning and put one foot on the floor before someone says he's the worst president ever. Has he made some missteps? Of course. Is he the first POTUS to do so? Far from it. Other former heads of state are allowed to blame their failures on the failures of past presidents-Obama, no way. Gas prices weren't high until he came into power. There was not trouble in the Middle East until he came into power. Recession-Obama's fault. Goes on vacation for two days-slacker. Never mind the GWB spent half his time in office out to lunch. Doesn't act on Libya-pussy. Acts on Libya-dictator. Enacts some type of health care reform when previous administrations have merely talked about it a lot-socialist. Attempts to act as head of the free world while still keeping in mind that he is an elected official serving the will of the American people, so agrees to compromise instead of putting his ego first-pussy, socialist, bad president. Funny thing is 90% of the people criticizing him couldn't handle his job for half a day. If he doesn't get re-elected, I wouldn't blame him for one minute if he turned around and told all of you FUCK OFF. How many people are blogging about your body odor Joe America?

I think if you were totally honest, you'd admit that both Obama and Bush have been treated like this. Not trying to say Bush was perfect--certainly not. But with the internet, instant blogging, and 24/7 news reports, no one is cut any slack. It's ridiculous. Previous presidents were not scrutinized minute to minute the way these two presidents have been treated. No matter what they try to do, they're given very little credit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guess what OP, you could pretty much put that query to any liberal or conservative regarding any elected president in the past 100 or more years. Disregard the Bush stolen election, certain people were against Obama before he was elected and at least cannot be considered fair weather friends. This guy can't get out of bed in the morning and put one foot on the floor before someone says he's the worst president ever. Has he made some missteps? Of course. Is he the first POTUS to do so? Far from it. Other former heads of state are allowed to blame their failures on the failures of past presidents-Obama, no way. Gas prices weren't high until he came into power. There was not trouble in the Middle East until he came into power. Recession-Obama's fault. Goes on vacation for two days-slacker. Never mind the GWB spent half his time in office out to lunch. Doesn't act on Libya-pussy. Acts on Libya-dictator. Enacts some type of health care reform when previous administrations have merely talked about it a lot-socialist. Attempts to act as head of the free world while still keeping in mind that he is an elected official serving the will of the American people, so agrees to compromise instead of putting his ego first-pussy, socialist, bad president. Funny thing is 90% of the people criticizing him couldn't handle his job for half a day. If he doesn't get re-elected, I wouldn't blame him for one minute if he turned around and told all of you FUCK OFF. How many people are blogging about your body odor Joe America?

I think if you were totally honest, you'd admit that both Obama and Bush have been treated like this. Not trying to say Bush was perfect--certainly not. But with the internet, instant blogging, and 24/7 news reports, no one is cut any slack. It's ridiculous. Previous presidents were not scrutinized minute to minute the way these two presidents have been treated. No matter what they try to do, they're given very little credit.

media coverage of Obama is MUCH more favorable than anything Bush ever received. And I don't understand it (other than partisanship and liberal bias), since Obama treats the media like shit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jeb could not make it through the primaries. He is establishment. The selection will not be made by the establishment/bussiness interest. It maybe Bachmann(she will get a lot of the Hillary vote)

Ahahaha I sincerely hope so! Bachmann is not going to get the Hillary vote. Women are not sheep, they won't blindly follow their own gender.

[Anonymous]

Bachmann most certainly will NOT get the Hillary vote- are you serious??? I would pray for a Palin/Bachmann ticket except that they make women look so very idiotic.

"That's why people need to continue to go to the town halls, continue to melt the phone lines of their liberal members of Congress, and let them know, under no certain circumstances will I give the government control over my body and my health care decisions." -Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN), a pro-lifer who completely missed the irony of using the same slogan as the pro-choice movement in arguing against health care reform

Regarding the Founding Fathers and the United Stated Constitution, ""We also know that the very founders that wrote those documents worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the United States."

"What I love about New Hampshire and what we have in common is our extreme love for liberty," she said, according to Politico. "You're the state where the shot was heard around the world in Lexington and Concord. And you put a marker in the ground and paid with the blood of your ancestors the very first price that had to be paid to make this the most magnificent nation that has ever arisen in the annals of man in 5,000 years of recorded history." --- except of course, that was Massachusetts not New Hampshire, as every 3rd grader knows.

[Anonymous]

I love listening to people wax on about their source of inspiration, only to get it all wrong. Bachmann is like one of those Christians who misquotes the bible.

[Anonymous]

Tea Party+ religious right + Palin endorsement = Bachmann '12

8:21 Outside of DC and a liberal talk show, no one cares about that, most don't know whats wrong with those statements.

Iowa:Buchmann wins
50% religious voters in primary(no Hucklabee, not running)

N. Hampshire Romney wins a close one(Mormon- religious southerns and Mormon do not work- not a real contender)

Nevada:Buchmann wins
Tea Party heavy in primaries, look at senate race

South Caroline:Buchmann wins
religious, tea party and Gov owes Palin

comes out of these primaries with money and tea partier crazies, everyone else falls in line.

Backmann '12
(could happen)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dude, I don't know about u but if I was in the military right now with these indecicive fools running the show.... I would pretend I died and go AWOL.

I would have done that during the Bush era. Thanks George for getting us bogged down in iraq. You couldn't have done it if you had told the truth!

[Anonymous]

Bush sucked but he and his administration were better and more adult than Obama and his. We need an adult, optimistic leader that has the guts and brains to shrink the government / grow the economy. Maybe Christie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A Clinton/Clinton ticket would be sooo cool.

Yeah. Maybe Hillary could keep Bill from fooling around with interns in the Oval Office.

Are you kidding? She should totally get some in the Oval office, and not from Bill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bush sucked but he and his administration were better and more adult than Obama and his. We need an adult, optimistic leader that has the guts and brains to shrink the government / grow the economy. Maybe Christie.

That who screwed up his own state's education grant proposal by personally intervening, and then blaming his mistake on the Feds only to have the truth come out on videotape?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tea Party+ religious right + Palin endorsement = Bachmann '12

8:21 Outside of DC and a liberal talk show, no one cares about that, most don't know whats wrong with those statements.

Iowa:Buchmann wins
50% religious voters in primary(no Hucklabee, not running)

N. Hampshire Romney wins a close one(Mormon- religious southerns and Mormon do not work- not a real contender)

Nevada:Buchmann wins
Tea Party heavy in primaries, look at senate race

South Caroline:Buchmann wins
religious, tea party and Gov owes Palin

comes out of these primaries with money and tea partier crazies, everyone else falls in line.

Backmann '12
(could happen)

From your lips to God's ears, said the liveral worried about Obama's re-election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tea Party+ religious right + Palin endorsement = Bachmann '12

8:21 Outside of DC and a liberal talk show, no one cares about that, most don't know whats wrong with those statements.

Iowa:Buchmann wins
50% religious voters in primary(no Hucklabee, not running)

N. Hampshire Romney wins a close one(Mormon- religious southerns and Mormon do not work- not a real contender)

Nevada:Buchmann wins
Tea Party heavy in primaries, look at senate race

South Caroline:Buchmann wins
religious, tea party and Gov owes Palin

comes out of these primaries with money and tea partier crazies, then a miracle happens everyone else falls in line.

Backmann '12
(could happen)

You forgot one step. I added it above.

[Anonymous]

if it is Bachmann, who gives the red meat speech at the convention? It is usually someone right of the candidate.

[Anonymous]

LOVE your post 21:11!! My sentiments exactly.

[Anonymous]

Is it just me, or is Michele Bachmann secretly Katherine Harris after a clandestine plastic surgery in Argentina?


The new identity was arranged as payback for throwing 2000.