best in-boundary potential for improvement?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Brookland at Bunker Hill


Um, why? I suppose you could say, like for Takoma, Bungalows in Brookland are $400K plus - but do tell. I know the 5 and under set is solidly middle class, mostly white -- is that why?
Anonymous
In this case, it's actually DCPS special ed that is the real problem, not the principal. DCPS needs to put special needs students in private settings if they can't do the job themselves. A transfer is being worked out but too many lawyers have made it nearly impossible to expel some students.

Anonymous wrote:A group of educated, professional in-bounds parents (over 30 families) is/was trying to improve Francis-Stevens Learning Center (K-8) from pre-school on up, taking it year by year. It's next to impossible due, in part, to a weak principal and some serious discipline issues that the principal can't/won't address (older child lying in wait to attack little kids--older child was suspended for a few days and that's that). Parents are fleeing if they can. So it's not ONLY a question of sending your child to the closest school. Would that it were!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I live in boundary for Garrison and there are many many professional families in this neighborhood with preschool and preK children. I see them out and about every day.


i do too but i don't know anyone who sends their kids to garrison or is planning to.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Two years ago no one considered Cooke for their kids, and now it's seen as a valid option because a group of parents decided it was.


Desperate not to move parents who can't afford private WANT it to be. Don't think they are staying past PS/PK though. I can't think of anyone in the neighborhood who didn't move on at that point except the one booster mom.

Have a lot of friends in bounds for Hearst, all planned on sending to the school when the kids were babies. Now all of them are scrambling too. Eaton still has huge numbers of OOB kids.

Good luck to everyone!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My goodness this ^attitude is nihilistic. Could any theoretical improvement have anything to do with neighborhood families having a commitment to the school and local community? Local businesses wanting to contribute to a school where their local clientele send their kids? A sense of duty to support the neighborhood school ( volunteering, financially, engaging with kids education). Maybe a "we're all in this together" feel that permeates the school in a way that would be harder with kids coming from scattered neighborhoods?

Any chance that the out of boundary kids who have spots in a school like that would also benefit from the changes? Any chance that the families that could no longer win out of boundary spots would then have inspiration and critical mass to pull off a similar transformation in their neighborhood?



Not likely. Easier to move, with a more certain result.
Anonymous
What's wrong with Hearst?
Anonymous
Um, why? I suppose you could say, like for Takoma, Bungalows in Brookland are $400K plus - but do tell. I know the 5 and under set is solidly middle class, mostly white -- is that why?
[Report Post]

Why Brookland--No--not because the 5 and under set is solidly middle class and white--I actually don't think it is. Brookland has more solidly middle class and black parents still (with under 5 kids) if you look at past census data and talk to parents, neighbors, etc.

The reason I think Brookland @Bunker Hill would be a good candidate for more involvement and attendance by neighborhood families:

1) If you are on the Brookland listserv, you would know that the PTA president (African American) recently posted that parents within the school which is predominately AA with some Hispanics, started talking about how to increase diversity in the school. This is telling to me that there is a seed of welcome in the school for new families of different races and importantly it is starting from within and not from outside.

2) Beautiful building with central location in Brookland

3) Half the kids are scoring proficient already--test scores are not great, but they are not down in the 30% range like many other schools.

4) Neighborhood growth--right now Brookland (like most of Ward 5) has a huge % of children in charters. I think the % of children in Ward 5 in charters is the highest in the city, or close to. A solid in bound option would help with the craziness of applying to multiple charters and out of bound options.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Two years ago no one considered Cooke for their kids, and now it's seen as a valid option because a group of parents decided it was.


Desperate not to move parents who can't afford private WANT it to be. Don't think they are staying past PS/PK though. I can't think of anyone in the neighborhood who didn't move on at that point except the one booster mom.

Have a lot of friends in bounds for Hearst, all planned on sending to the school when the kids were babies. Now all of them are scrambling too. Eaton still has huge numbers of OOB kids.

Good luck to everyone!


We're a happy, in boundary, Hearst family. Why are your friends "scrambling?"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Two years ago no one considered Cooke for their kids, and now it's seen as a valid option because a group of parents decided it was.


Desperate not to move parents who can't afford private WANT it to be. Don't think they are staying past PS/PK though. I can't think of anyone in the neighborhood who didn't move on at that point except the one booster mom.

Have a lot of friends in bounds for Hearst, all planned on sending to the school when the kids were babies. Now all of them are scrambling too. Eaton still has huge numbers of OOB kids.

Good luck to everyone!


We're a happy, in boundary, Hearst family. Why are your friends "scrambling?"


According to them, no one they know is actually going to send their kid now that they are close to school age. What are your thoughts on why Hearst has so many OOB families? Many kids do end up going private and the demographics shift a lot in upper grades, some families want to try to try to get into a situation where that is less likely.
Anonymous
I can give a number of reasons. Perhaps it's because the neighborhood has a number of families who would never consider public, no matter how great the school. But, sadly, I think some of it is ignorance, perpetual rumor, and good old-fashioned "white flight." What gets me is the constant questions about the numbers of OOB students. I think you'd be surprised by who those OOB students are, what their parents do for a living, where they live, their parent's education, etc. And some of those children you might assume are OOB (because of the color of their skin?) are actually in-boundary.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can we hijack this thread and rename it, "best out-of-boundary potential for ruination?"

'Cuz i'm thinking that as JKLM students leave for the private schools in the later grades, some enterprising disadvantaged kids could really make a difference if they applied OOB.

I'm leading a takeover of Key! Who's with me? Bring your pitchforks, everyone!


I thought this is already what happens...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Two years ago no one considered Cooke for their kids, and now it's seen as a valid option because a group of parents decided it was.


Desperate not to move parents who can't afford private WANT it to be. Don't think they are staying past PS/PK though. I can't think of anyone in the neighborhood who didn't move on at that point except the one booster mom.

Have a lot of friends in bounds for Hearst, all planned on sending to the school when the kids were babies. Now all of them are scrambling too. Eaton still has huge numbers of OOB kids.

Good luck to everyone!


We're a happy, in boundary, Hearst family. Why are your friends "scrambling?"


Because PP is a troll and writes this kind of post about *any* DCPS school, regardless of what the school is actually like. Welcome to the "DCPS/PCS Forum"!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Two years ago no one considered Cooke for their kids, and now it's seen as a valid option because a group of parents decided it was.


Desperate not to move parents who can't afford private WANT it to be. Don't think they are staying past PS/PK though. I can't think of anyone in the neighborhood who didn't move on at that point except the one booster mom.

Have a lot of friends in bounds for Hearst, all planned on sending to the school when the kids were babies. Now all of them are scrambling too. Eaton still has huge numbers of OOB kids.

Good luck to everyone!


We're a happy, in boundary, Hearst family. Why are your friends "scrambling?"


Because PP is a troll and writes this kind of post about *any* DCPS school, regardless of what the school is actually like. Welcome to the "DCPS/PCS Forum"!



And if you actually have a child who attends the school in question, you are a "booster" whose first-hand opinion is immediately discredited. Unless it's negative, of course.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Two years ago no one considered Cooke for their kids, and now it's seen as a valid option because a group of parents decided it was.


Desperate not to move parents who can't afford private WANT it to be. Don't think they are staying past PS/PK though. I can't think of anyone in the neighborhood who didn't move on at that point except the one booster mom.

Have a lot of friends in bounds for Hearst, all planned on sending to the school when the kids were babies. Now all of them are scrambling too. Eaton still has huge numbers of OOB kids.

Good luck to everyone!


We're a happy, in boundary, Hearst family. Why are your friends "scrambling?"


Because PP is a troll and writes this kind of post about *any* DCPS school, regardless of what the school is actually like. Welcome to the "DCPS/PCS Forum"!


Nope, all of my kids attend DCPS, OOB as a matter of fact. Sorry to burst your bubble.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can we hijack this thread and rename it, "best out-of-boundary potential for ruination?"

'Cuz i'm thinking that as JKLM students leave for the private schools in the later grades, some enterprising disadvantaged kids could really make a difference if they applied OOB.

I'm leading a takeover of Key! Who's with me? Bring your pitchforks, everyone!


I thought this is already what happens...


Best line in a while.
Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Go to: