Analysis of Wellesley's graduating Class of 2026 - including that 73% of respondents identify as LGBT

[Anonymous]

Yes failure , don't throw your girls away

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting that there are so few all male colleges. Why do you think that is?

Well they used to all be 100% male and no one assumed everyone there was gay. Why do you think that is?

[Anonymous]

I don't think we needed proof of this, anyone who knows knows, but it's nice to have statistical evidence?

[Anonymous]

Women's colleges were normal when colleges didn't accept women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All women’s colleges are now nightmares of wokeism, LGBTQ identity, gender dysphoria, depression, eating disorders, and other mental illnesses.

Normal, well-adjusted young women do not attend these schools any more, and normal families do not send their daughters there any longer.

As both the husband and son of Wellesley alumnae, I find the decline of these institutions profoundly sad. But it is what it is.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All women’s colleges are now nightmares of wokeism, LGBTQ identity, gender dysphoria, depression, eating disorders, and other mental illnesses.

Normal, well-adjusted young women do not attend these schools any more, and normal families do not send their daughters there any longer.

As both the husband and son of Wellesley alumnae, I find the decline of these institutions profoundly sad. But it is what it is.

If normal means MAGA, then you have a point.
NYC schools all have a strong pipeline sending brilliant kids to Wellesley every year.

“Brilliant?” That’s a stretch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it interesting that there are so few all male colleges. Why do you think that is?

We don't have a culture of women raping men en masse at college

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The reason for women's colleges was for normal girls to focus on studies away from their sutitors (male) it has turned into a freak show of degenerates definitely need to change it from women college to MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+ college

Whoa do you know what MMIW stands for? It has nothing to do with sexuality and you're a jerk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When did the word “takes” replace “opinions?”

Are you ancient?

No. And this is poor journalism, at best.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When we visited Wellesley this year for admitted students day, we saw a campus full of independent women who seemed very smart, confident, and self possessed, straight or gay. A lot of them came across as strong leadership types. Students clearly had their own opinions and were comfortable expressing them.

You can say that about every college.

[Anonymous]

LGBTQ+ is a political alignment, not a sexuality bucket
"Q+" . The "Q" means "almost anything" and the "+" means "anything".

Less than 25% of the graduating class responded to this survey.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When did the word “takes” replace “opinions?”

It's "hot take" , not "take", and it means "ignorant opinion formed without thinking"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:LGBTQ+ is a political alignment, not a sexuality bucket
"Q+" . The "Q" means "almost anything" and the "+" means "anything".

Less than 25% of the graduating class responded to this survey.

This is correct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When we visited Wellesley this year for admitted students day, we saw a campus full of independent women who seemed very smart, confident, and self possessed, straight or gay. A lot of them came across as strong leadership types. Students clearly had their own opinions and were comfortable expressing them.

You can say that about every college.

The vibes are very different among colleges. Some are quirky, some are intense, others are pretentious.

[Anonymous]

Is there a tendency now for straight females to identify as Q+ ? (in particular at this college)

Did just the lesbians and straight Q+ ladies respond to the survey?

I would like to know what the survey take-away is, but a 25% response rate makes it difficult.