Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Can you post the community letter?
The gist was that this morning they received an anonymous tip that a student had a weapon. They immediately called local PD and they then recovered the handgun from a student following a self search. It then praised students for following the "See Something, Say Something" mantra and encouraged parents to speak with kids about guns
So basically, MCPS is outsourcing it's entirely security strategy to minor children and relying on them to be their systemwide threat detection system? That sounds....irresponsible.
Some of you people are so gosh darned miserable that you cannot even recognize when something actually worked.
MCPS Admin: Put your ego aside and get out of your feelings. How does what you said address my point? Yes, THIS TIME, it went well. But my point is how scalable and how sustainable is that approach? You think the entirety of MCPS security strategy should be reliant on kids telling you someone in the building has a weapon or is a threat?
MCPS doesn't want to fund more security guards. They'd rather buy polo's for central office.
You could add 10 more security guards in each school and you would still need to rely on students doing the right thing and notifying adults when there is a risk. Yes, metal detectors would be nice but until that day comes,
no amount of security will stop these events unless you authorize them to do full pat downs as kids enter the school.
Wouldn't that be a violation of students' constitutional rights?
Yes. It also would be highly invasive and a massive risk for handling minors. That's why adding an army of security guards won't solve anything without relying on the ability for students to do the right thing in reporting threats and risks.
So again: The only threat detection system that MCPS is going to deploy to prevent weapons from getting in the school building is for the minor students to be the ones doing the detecting, right?
Again, I said metal detectors would be ideal but until that happens what else do you think should be done?
I disagree that metal detectors are ideal. First, we all carry metal so if you’re going to have a metal detector, you also need an x-ray for bags. Otherwise spiral notebooks and keys etc are going to set off the metal detector and every single bag will have to be searched. I go through a courthouse metal detector daily and my underwire bra regularly sets it off. You are going to have teen undergarments setting it off as well. Then what are you going to do, pat them down? An extra wand sweep? This will take forever with the number of people coming in at the same time every morning. It’s not practical, and more guns are being made of plastic now anyway.
Human intelligence is the way you keep communities like this safe. Kids know stuff and if everyone wants to stay safe and they know how to report and trust the adults in charge they will report. It’s a better basis for searches etc than the dragnet of subjecting all students to searches/metal detectors etc