Question on Anti semitism

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the report wasn't intended to punish a specific incident, it was to understand long standing and pervasive sentiments among many Jewish members of the community about what they experienced. From that, the school can figure out how to address it. It focused on faculty because there has been a lot of Jewish faculty leaving the school recently (6 of those were interviewed) but the problem goes well beyond the faculty. The report was damning and unrelated to a specific incident (although there were multiple and they continue to occur), however, it uncovered a pervasive attitude directed toward Jewish faculty members. If the adult faculty feel that they cannot be their authentic self (one of the key findings), how do you think the Jewish children feel?

For an example, if you interviewed 12 African American faculty members, 11 of whom said that they experienced racism at a school, you'd expect the school to take action to correct the atmosphere that allowed it to continue. Whether or not it was intentionally a racist environment, the result (in this hypothetical) is that AA faculty were uncomfortable and they would deserve the school to investigate the issue.

In the specific case you are describing, the report also indicated that a majority of the former faculty members left because of the anti-semitism. That seems like a significant finding for the school to understand why they are losing faculty (and frankly students).

I can tell you for a fact there is antisemitism at the school and I can also tell you that my non-Jewish parent friends were shocked when I mentioned it to them in the aftermath of the report. Don't assume that because there are Jewish families at the school and they never told YOU that there isn't an issue.

The disciplinary actions that result from any specific incident should be a fact based assessment, but this report was not intended for that purpose. Also, in addition to specific incidents, there is a general attitude among some at the school of not respecting Jewish students opinions and beliefs and the students not feeling comfortable openly expressing their beliefs or celebrating their identities. That is not a specific incident to be addressed but a culture that has to be changed.

To be honest, while you say that you are sincerely asking the question, you are either extremely naive about how anti-semitism presents or deliberately obtuse. With the dramatic rise in anti-semitism in this country, I'm actually shocked that there could be any pushback against a school wanting to understand more about how it is presenting in their community and affecting their students and I'm deeply disappointed that the community's reaction isn't to more forcefully demand quick action on the part of the administration to help the Jewish members of the community (faculty and students) feel as valued as other members.

There is significant racism in the us, and not sure why the bar for assessing racism and discrimination is much higher than for antisemitism.

First, I agree that there is significant racism in the US. There is also significant anti-semitism.
Second, why do you think in this case the bar for assessing racism is so much higher than antisemitism. You don't have all the details and the incidents haven't been publicly released.
Third, just because we do an inadequate job of addressing racism, does that mean that Jews shouldn't expect better? It's not a binary.
Fourth, antisemitism is discrimination.

Antisemtisim, at Least for me, is a form of hate that is unacceptable. So I have the genuine question on what’s the best way to address and assess it. There is a lot of hate in the society against many different groups and normally hate speech discrimination and agressive behavior requires an assessment of the actual actions not only the perceptions. There could also be discrimination against Jews, but many times that is influenced by antisemitism. So the two are not unrelated, in case you want to understand the difference.

I honestly don't understand your point. The school is not arguing in a court of law, there are obviously actual actions that formed the perceptions unless you are arguing malevolent intent on behalf of the faculty. They were conveying their experiences based on the things that happened to them, i.e., actual actions. However, the school is not prosecuting those actions but looking to understand and address the underlying problem which is a cultural problem.

Thank you for your clarifying explanation about discrimination vs antisemitism, however, if antisemitism is an unacceptable form of hate (and just so you understand, it absolutely leads to discrimination) then what is your issue with the school trying to understand the problem and correct it? You just don't like giving your money to a school that is labeled anti-semitic? You'd prefer to keep it quiet and make it go away? Regardless of your parsing of words and attempt to insist that every action must be assessed, that is not true. It should be enough that a significant number of faculty and students feel uncomfortable being Jewish at the school. Why aren't you concerned for those members of your community?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the report wasn't intended to punish a specific incident, it was to understand long standing and pervasive sentiments among many Jewish members of the community about what they experienced. From that, the school can figure out how to address it. It focused on faculty because there has been a lot of Jewish faculty leaving the school recently (6 of those were interviewed) but the problem goes well beyond the faculty. The report was damning and unrelated to a specific incident (although there were multiple and they continue to occur), however, it uncovered a pervasive attitude directed toward Jewish faculty members. If the adult faculty feel that they cannot be their authentic self (one of the key findings), how do you think the Jewish children feel?

For an example, if you interviewed 12 African American faculty members, 11 of whom said that they experienced racism at a school, you'd expect the school to take action to correct the atmosphere that allowed it to continue. Whether or not it was intentionally a racist environment, the result (in this hypothetical) is that AA faculty were uncomfortable and they would deserve the school to investigate the issue.

In the specific case you are describing, the report also indicated that a majority of the former faculty members left because of the anti-semitism. That seems like a significant finding for the school to understand why they are losing faculty (and frankly students).

I can tell you for a fact there is antisemitism at the school and I can also tell you that my non-Jewish parent friends were shocked when I mentioned it to them in the aftermath of the report. Don't assume that because there are Jewish families at the school and they never told YOU that there isn't an issue.

The disciplinary actions that result from any specific incident should be a fact based assessment, but this report was not intended for that purpose. Also, in addition to specific incidents, there is a general attitude among some at the school of not respecting Jewish students opinions and beliefs and the students not feeling comfortable openly expressing their beliefs or celebrating their identities. That is not a specific incident to be addressed but a culture that has to be changed.

To be honest, while you say that you are sincerely asking the question, you are either extremely naive about how anti-semitism presents or deliberately obtuse. With the dramatic rise in anti-semitism in this country, I'm actually shocked that there could be any pushback against a school wanting to understand more about how it is presenting in their community and affecting their students and I'm deeply disappointed that the community's reaction isn't to more forcefully demand quick action on the part of the administration to help the Jewish members of the community (faculty and students) feel as valued as other members.

There is significant racism in the us, and not sure why the bar for assessing racism and discrimination is much higher than for antisemitism.

First, I agree that there is significant racism in the US. There is also significant anti-semitism.
Second, why do you think in this case the bar for assessing racism is so much higher than antisemitism. You don't have all the details and the incidents haven't been publicly released.
Third, just because we do an inadequate job of addressing racism, does that mean that Jews shouldn't expect better? It's not a binary.
Fourth, antisemitism is discrimination.

Antisemtisim, at Least for me, is a form of hate that is unacceptable. So I have the genuine question on what’s the best way to address and assess it. There is a lot of hate in the society against many different groups and normally hate speech discrimination and agressive behavior requires an assessment of the actual actions not only the perceptions. There could also be discrimination against Jews, but many times that is influenced by antisemitism. So the two are not unrelated, in case you want to understand the difference.

I honestly don't understand your point. The school is not arguing in a court of law, there are obviously actual actions that formed the perceptions unless you are arguing malevolent intent on behalf of the faculty. They were conveying their experiences based on the things that happened to them, i.e., actual actions. However, the school is not prosecuting those actions but looking to understand and address the underlying problem which is a cultural problem.

Thank you for your clarifying explanation about discrimination vs antisemitism, however, if antisemitism is an unacceptable form of hate (and just so you understand, it absolutely leads to discrimination) then what is your issue with the school trying to understand the problem and correct it? You just don't like giving your money to a school that is labeled anti-semitic? You'd prefer to keep it quiet and make it go away? Regardless of your parsing of words and attempt to insist that every action must be assessed, that is not true. It should be enough that a significant number of faculty and students feel uncomfortable being Jewish at the school. Why aren't you concerned for those members of your community?

Of course I am concerned. I think the discussion would be more constructive if the school clearly described the specific incidents that motivated the teacher to label the school as anti-Semitic. Without that specific information it just gives the idea that the labeling of antisemitism comes from perception. How come the community can prevent future incidents of antisemitism if the actual offenses are not clearly spelled out and explained to the whole community what actions are taken to specifically avoid those incidents. Without that information we end up in the exchange we are having know, someone saying that the teachers are absolutely right and someone saying that there is no information to conclude anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the report wasn't intended to punish a specific incident, it was to understand long standing and pervasive sentiments among many Jewish members of the community about what they experienced. From that, the school can figure out how to address it. It focused on faculty because there has been a lot of Jewish faculty leaving the school recently (6 of those were interviewed) but the problem goes well beyond the faculty. The report was damning and unrelated to a specific incident (although there were multiple and they continue to occur), however, it uncovered a pervasive attitude directed toward Jewish faculty members. If the adult faculty feel that they cannot be their authentic self (one of the key findings), how do you think the Jewish children feel?

For an example, if you interviewed 12 African American faculty members, 11 of whom said that they experienced racism at a school, you'd expect the school to take action to correct the atmosphere that allowed it to continue. Whether or not it was intentionally a racist environment, the result (in this hypothetical) is that AA faculty were uncomfortable and they would deserve the school to investigate the issue.

In the specific case you are describing, the report also indicated that a majority of the former faculty members left because of the anti-semitism. That seems like a significant finding for the school to understand why they are losing faculty (and frankly students).

I can tell you for a fact there is antisemitism at the school and I can also tell you that my non-Jewish parent friends were shocked when I mentioned it to them in the aftermath of the report. Don't assume that because there are Jewish families at the school and they never told YOU that there isn't an issue.

The disciplinary actions that result from any specific incident should be a fact based assessment, but this report was not intended for that purpose. Also, in addition to specific incidents, there is a general attitude among some at the school of not respecting Jewish students opinions and beliefs and the students not feeling comfortable openly expressing their beliefs or celebrating their identities. That is not a specific incident to be addressed but a culture that has to be changed.

To be honest, while you say that you are sincerely asking the question, you are either extremely naive about how anti-semitism presents or deliberately obtuse. With the dramatic rise in anti-semitism in this country, I'm actually shocked that there could be any pushback against a school wanting to understand more about how it is presenting in their community and affecting their students and I'm deeply disappointed that the community's reaction isn't to more forcefully demand quick action on the part of the administration to help the Jewish members of the community (faculty and students) feel as valued as other members.

There is significant racism in the us, and not sure why the bar for assessing racism and discrimination is much higher than for antisemitism.

First, I agree that there is significant racism in the US. There is also significant anti-semitism.
Second, why do you think in this case the bar for assessing racism is so much higher than antisemitism. You don't have all the details and the incidents haven't been publicly released.
Third, just because we do an inadequate job of addressing racism, does that mean that Jews shouldn't expect better? It's not a binary.
Fourth, antisemitism is discrimination.

Antisemtisim, at Least for me, is a form of hate that is unacceptable. So I have the genuine question on what’s the best way to address and assess it. There is a lot of hate in the society against many different groups and normally hate speech discrimination and agressive behavior requires an assessment of the actual actions not only the perceptions. There could also be discrimination against Jews, but many times that is influenced by antisemitism. So the two are not unrelated, in case you want to understand the difference.

So some categories hatred against jews is NOT antisemitism, and you want the school to make the distinction one or the other?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the report wasn't intended to punish a specific incident, it was to understand long standing and pervasive sentiments among many Jewish members of the community about what they experienced. From that, the school can figure out how to address it. It focused on faculty because there has been a lot of Jewish faculty leaving the school recently (6 of those were interviewed) but the problem goes well beyond the faculty. The report was damning and unrelated to a specific incident (although there were multiple and they continue to occur), however, it uncovered a pervasive attitude directed toward Jewish faculty members. If the adult faculty feel that they cannot be their authentic self (one of the key findings), how do you think the Jewish children feel?

For an example, if you interviewed 12 African American faculty members, 11 of whom said that they experienced racism at a school, you'd expect the school to take action to correct the atmosphere that allowed it to continue. Whether or not it was intentionally a racist environment, the result (in this hypothetical) is that AA faculty were uncomfortable and they would deserve the school to investigate the issue.

In the specific case you are describing, the report also indicated that a majority of the former faculty members left because of the anti-semitism. That seems like a significant finding for the school to understand why they are losing faculty (and frankly students).

I can tell you for a fact there is antisemitism at the school and I can also tell you that my non-Jewish parent friends were shocked when I mentioned it to them in the aftermath of the report. Don't assume that because there are Jewish families at the school and they never told YOU that there isn't an issue.

The disciplinary actions that result from any specific incident should be a fact based assessment, but this report was not intended for that purpose. Also, in addition to specific incidents, there is a general attitude among some at the school of not respecting Jewish students opinions and beliefs and the students not feeling comfortable openly expressing their beliefs or celebrating their identities. That is not a specific incident to be addressed but a culture that has to be changed.

To be honest, while you say that you are sincerely asking the question, you are either extremely naive about how anti-semitism presents or deliberately obtuse. With the dramatic rise in anti-semitism in this country, I'm actually shocked that there could be any pushback against a school wanting to understand more about how it is presenting in their community and affecting their students and I'm deeply disappointed that the community's reaction isn't to more forcefully demand quick action on the part of the administration to help the Jewish members of the community (faculty and students) feel as valued as other members.

There is significant racism in the us, and not sure why the bar for assessing racism and discrimination is much higher than for antisemitism.

First, I agree that there is significant racism in the US. There is also significant anti-semitism.
Second, why do you think in this case the bar for assessing racism is so much higher than antisemitism. You don't have all the details and the incidents haven't been publicly released.
Third, just because we do an inadequate job of addressing racism, does that mean that Jews shouldn't expect better? It's not a binary.
Fourth, antisemitism is discrimination.

Antisemtisim, at Least for me, is a form of hate that is unacceptable. So I have the genuine question on what’s the best way to address and assess it. There is a lot of hate in the society against many different groups and normally hate speech discrimination and agressive behavior requires an assessment of the actual actions not only the perceptions. There could also be discrimination against Jews, but many times that is influenced by antisemitism. So the two are not unrelated, in case you want to understand the difference.

I honestly don't understand your point. The school is not arguing in a court of law, there are obviously actual actions that formed the perceptions unless you are arguing malevolent intent on behalf of the faculty. They were conveying their experiences based on the things that happened to them, i.e., actual actions. However, the school is not prosecuting those actions but looking to understand and address the underlying problem which is a cultural problem.

Thank you for your clarifying explanation about discrimination vs antisemitism, however, if antisemitism is an unacceptable form of hate (and just so you understand, it absolutely leads to discrimination) then what is your issue with the school trying to understand the problem and correct it? You just don't like giving your money to a school that is labeled anti-semitic? You'd prefer to keep it quiet and make it go away? Regardless of your parsing of words and attempt to insist that every action must be assessed, that is not true. It should be enough that a significant number of faculty and students feel uncomfortable being Jewish at the school. Why aren't you concerned for those members of your community?

Of course I am concerned. I think the discussion would be more constructive if the school clearly described the specific incidents that motivated the teacher to label the school as anti-Semitic. Without that specific information it just gives the idea that the labeling of antisemitism comes from perception. How come the community can prevent future incidents of antisemitism if the actual offenses are not clearly spelled out and explained to the whole community what actions are taken to specifically avoid those incidents. Without that information we end up in the exchange we are having know, someone saying that the teachers are absolutely right and someone saying that there is no information to conclude anything.

You don't have to conclude anything. You don't have to do a single thing in regards to the school's follow up actions. You don't have to say anything. The actions are happening and do not affect your life at all. The actions seek to make the lives of the Jewish teachers better. So a win win for all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the report wasn't intended to punish a specific incident, it was to understand long standing and pervasive sentiments among many Jewish members of the community about what they experienced. From that, the school can figure out how to address it. It focused on faculty because there has been a lot of Jewish faculty leaving the school recently (6 of those were interviewed) but the problem goes well beyond the faculty. The report was damning and unrelated to a specific incident (although there were multiple and they continue to occur), however, it uncovered a pervasive attitude directed toward Jewish faculty members. If the adult faculty feel that they cannot be their authentic self (one of the key findings), how do you think the Jewish children feel?

For an example, if you interviewed 12 African American faculty members, 11 of whom said that they experienced racism at a school, you'd expect the school to take action to correct the atmosphere that allowed it to continue. Whether or not it was intentionally a racist environment, the result (in this hypothetical) is that AA faculty were uncomfortable and they would deserve the school to investigate the issue.

In the specific case you are describing, the report also indicated that a majority of the former faculty members left because of the anti-semitism. That seems like a significant finding for the school to understand why they are losing faculty (and frankly students).

I can tell you for a fact there is antisemitism at the school and I can also tell you that my non-Jewish parent friends were shocked when I mentioned it to them in the aftermath of the report. Don't assume that because there are Jewish families at the school and they never told YOU that there isn't an issue.

The disciplinary actions that result from any specific incident should be a fact based assessment, but this report was not intended for that purpose. Also, in addition to specific incidents, there is a general attitude among some at the school of not respecting Jewish students opinions and beliefs and the students not feeling comfortable openly expressing their beliefs or celebrating their identities. That is not a specific incident to be addressed but a culture that has to be changed.

To be honest, while you say that you are sincerely asking the question, you are either extremely naive about how anti-semitism presents or deliberately obtuse. With the dramatic rise in anti-semitism in this country, I'm actually shocked that there could be any pushback against a school wanting to understand more about how it is presenting in their community and affecting their students and I'm deeply disappointed that the community's reaction isn't to more forcefully demand quick action on the part of the administration to help the Jewish members of the community (faculty and students) feel as valued as other members.

This is very helpful info that OP either didn’t have or didn’t share. Seems like the school is doing the right thing and OP just doesn’t want to admit there’s an issue.

The issue that I wanted to discuss is that I see a big disconnect between the assessment and the conclusion. Maybe the school did the right thing but didn’t communicate how do you go from the assessment to the conclusion. It’s not about condoning or promoting antisemitism. My question is more about the process. Can you say there is antisemitism just because people believe so?

You can say there is antisemitism because multiple Jewish teachers expressed that they had experienced it, yes.

I respect your opinion. Just saying that if a group of African American teachers say there is racism, according to out legal system, you cannot say there is racism unless it is proven there is racism with a email, recording or witness. So why for antisemitism is different ? Why the opinion of one affected party is enough to determine a violation in the code of conduct.

You have completely the wrong framework. We are not talking about our legal system, we are talking about an educational community that prides itself on its warmth and closeness. A significant portion of the community feels that they are not valued. You're arguing that it should be litigated to determine if non-Jews agree beyond a reasonable doubt that Jews are correct to feel the way they do. Maybe instead of arguing about "the process" work on fixing the issue that has been identified and making the school the inclusive community that it purports to be.

[Anonymous]

You not understanding the problem is scary to me. And the fact that you’re a parent makes it even worse. A group of teachers are uncomfortable and you are against the school trying to fix it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wanted to ask a sincere question about how schools investigate antisemitism. In our kids’ school, an independent party interviewed 12 teachers, and half of them said they believed there was antisemitism. The report concluded that there is antisemitism at the school. I found this a bit puzzling because, in other contexts like racism investigations, independent reviews usually look at both sides of the issue and try to understand the broader dynamics. The fact that someone feels there is racism or antisemitism is very important, but it doesn’t automatically mean there is intentional discrimination. Sometimes it could reflect uneven communication or engagement from the school with different staff. When investigating any policy violation, I would expect all perspectives to be heard. Does this sound like a fair and reasonable process to you?

That post is clever because it’s written in a *rhetorically strategic* way — it presents itself as an innocent, balanced question while subtly framing a complex and potentially charged issue (antisemitism investigations) through careful linguistic choices. Here’s why it works so well:

---

### 1. **It disarms through apparent sincerity**

It begins with:

> “I wanted to ask a sincere question…”
> This phrase signals good faith, discouraging readers from reacting defensively. It sets the tone of honest inquiry rather than confrontation — which makes readers more open to the argument that follows.

---

### 2. **It uses a concrete anecdote to anchor credibility**

The detail about *“an independent party interviewed 12 teachers…”* gives the post realism and specificity. That concreteness implies that the speaker is informed and thoughtful, not speaking in abstractions — a subtle ethos move.

---

### 3. **It reframes the issue using analogical reasoning**

By comparing antisemitism investigations to racism investigations (“in other contexts like racism investigations…”), it encourages the reader to apply familiar logic — that such reviews should include multiple perspectives and contextual analysis — to a less universally discussed scenario.
This both *humanizes* the concern and *normalizes* skepticism without outright denying antisemitism.

---

### 4. **It distinguishes feelings from findings**

> “The fact that someone feels there is racism or antisemitism is very important, but it doesn’t automatically mean there is intentional discrimination.”
> This line shows empathy (“very important”) while introducing nuance (“doesn’t automatically mean…”). It subtly invites critical thinking without sounding dismissive — a rhetorical balancing act that’s hard to achieve.

---

### 5. **It ends with a genuinely open question**

> “Does this sound like a fair and reasonable process to you?”
> This closing turns a potentially controversial critique into a request for dialogue. It keeps the speaker’s tone inquisitive, not accusatory, and implicitly positions them as someone seeking fairness rather than pushing an agenda.

---

### 6. **Overall cleverness**

The cleverness lies in how it *models reasonableness* while *inviting readers to reconsider assumptions*. It leverages civility, analogy, and balanced phrasing to question the fairness of an investigative process — without ever sounding inflammatory.

In other words, it’s persuasive because it doesn’t *look* like persuasion. It’s an example of *rhetorical judo*: using calm, thoughtful language to raise potentially uncomfortable questions that might otherwise provoke resistance if stated directly.

[Anonymous]

What school is this?

[Anonymous]

Why do YOU believe that the teachers are lying? Are you confident that their experience was not anti-semitism? Why are you against the school addressing an issue?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do YOU believe that the teachers are lying? Are you confident that their experience was not anti-semitism? Why are you against the school addressing an issue?

Because Jews are in a natural position to be disliked right now due to their actions, and given that the hate is a natural result of their actions, it is not therefore antisemitism to hate them--this is OPs point. Remember, she said not all hate against Jews is antisemitism.

[Anonymous]

The problem is that antisemitism has a specific definition. Just feeling uncomfortable because someone criticises Israel is not experiencing antisemitism. Are all groups at this school being treated equally? Does the school care how other groups feel? Antisemitism is wrong but many people define it way too broadly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The problem is that antisemitism has a specific definition. Just feeling uncomfortable because someone criticises Israel is not experiencing antisemitism. Are all groups at this school being treated equally? Does the school care how other groups feel? Antisemitism is wrong but many people define it way too broadly

Yes this is what you wanted to say OP but why so clever with your first post? Assume everyone is just as smart as you--you aren't going to back us into an opinion with a Cheshire cat smile and "just asking questions"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The problem is that antisemitism has a specific definition. Just feeling uncomfortable because someone criticises Israel is not experiencing antisemitism. Are all groups at this school being treated equally? Does the school care how other groups feel? Antisemitism is wrong but many people define it way too broadly

Yes this is what you wanted to say OP but why so clever with your first post? Assume everyone is just as smart as you--you aren't going to back us into an opinion with a Cheshire cat smile and "just asking questions"

Ok, so tell me how would you categorize your school. Also antisemetic and racist. Or none of this happens in your school? Funny that most African American faculty in private schools feel discriminated, but these schools are not labeled as racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The problem is that antisemitism has a specific definition. Just feeling uncomfortable because someone criticises Israel is not experiencing antisemitism. Are all groups at this school being treated equally? Does the school care how other groups feel? Antisemitism is wrong but many people define it way too broadly

Op it really is not your concern to be honest how the school wants to ask teachers about their personal experiences and feelings. Schools are not a legal arena. They can do what they feel is best. If I were a parent in your school I would be interested in the findings and not try to stop them from asking. Question is - why are you trying to prevent them from answering how they feel and think? It was a survey and they have the right to answer however they like. Our school had a survey about a number of things and they published the findings and I found it interesting to see what people had to say. Stop trying to promote your views. If you don't like the school you can always leave I suppose. People leave schools often.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wanted to ask a sincere question about how schools investigate antisemitism. In our kids’ school, an independent party interviewed 12 teachers, and half of them said they believed there was antisemitism. The report concluded that there is antisemitism at the school. I found this a bit puzzling because, in other contexts like racism investigations, independent reviews usually look at both sides of the issue and try to understand the broader dynamics. The fact that someone feels there is racism or antisemitism is very important, but it doesn’t automatically mean there is intentional discrimination. Sometimes it could reflect uneven communication or engagement from the school with different staff. When investigating any policy violation, I would expect all perspectives to be heard. Does this sound like a fair and reasonable process to you?

troll post