Trump to replace government with AI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://oligarchwatch.substack.com/p/the-little-known-think-tank-pushing

"A think tank with ties to right-wing billionaires Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Charles Koch, the Foundation for American Innovation (FAI), is pushing a radical plan to replace large swaths of the federal government with artificial intelligence.

FAI suggests up to 30% of federal workers could be replaced by AI."

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/13/ai-is-opening-a-maga-trump-split-00534925

"Trump’s rush toward AI is exposing an important faultline in the Republican coalition: Many of its voters and leaders deeply mistrust the power of Big Tech, but Trump himself has worked closely with industry CEOs to deliver on their priorities."

How about "AI" as President! AI2025 ! ?

See 1984. Big Brother's talking head on the screen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well this tracks because the GOP doesn’t want a working government.

Statements like this make me realize how dumb people are. They don’t understand what government does. They don’t understand AI and AI’s limits.

My spouse had to call the IRS 3x this year for an error they had in our records. First person didn’t know how to fix it. Second person saw the record of the case and promised to fix it but didn’t. Third person actually fixed it manually after a 50 minute call.

I shudder to think of an AI dominated world where we have no humans around to fix the records when systems go wrong.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…

Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.

As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?

Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.

The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.

It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.

I mean what is that based on other than the delusions in your own head? How do you know what the “stereotypical government worker thinks? You’re the one making up the stereotype.

It seems to me that people working for the government would be more likely to have a family member that was a miner or a domestic worker than Peter Thiel or Elon Musk. Or are you saying that since Musk’s dad owned an emerald mine he’s more concerned with the plight of miners?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:AI is not right or left.

It is profitable. It is going to take over, no matter who occupies the WH or Congress.

It's profitable with a huge cost to environmental resources and human life. Not that Trump, Vance, Musk, or Thiel care about anyone but themselves.

Elon is barking about Trump's rising deficit and he thinks AI is the only way to save America. I think cutting out the grift and taxing billionaires at a higher rate and cutting tariffs to Biden levels would be a better start.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…

Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.

As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?

Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.

The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.

It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.

I mean what is that based on other than the delusions in your own head? How do you know what the “stereotypical government worker thinks? You’re the one making up the stereotype.

It seems to me that people working for the government would be more likely to have a family member that was a miner or a domestic worker than Peter Thiel or Elon Musk. Or are you saying that since Musk’s dad owned an emerald mine he’s more concerned with the plight of miners?

I guess I’m imagining all those DC feds who proudly mention they would never buy an American car, who pay their domestic workers under the table and voted overwhelmingly for a candidate who promised to put an end to coal.

Now that their own jobs are on the line, they’re having a chance of heart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…

Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.

As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?

Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.

The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.

It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.

I mean what is that based on other than the delusions in your own head? How do you know what the “stereotypical government worker thinks? You’re the one making up the stereotype.

It seems to me that people working for the government would be more likely to have a family member that was a miner or a domestic worker than Peter Thiel or Elon Musk. Or are you saying that since Musk’s dad owned an emerald mine he’s more concerned with the plight of miners?

I guess I’m imagining all those DC feds who proudly mention they would never buy an American car, who pay their domestic workers under the table and voted overwhelmingly for a candidate who promised to put an end to coal.

Now that their own jobs are on the line, they’re having a chance of heart.

This is stupid af.

There are no “American” cars anymore because they all have parts from all over the world. And many U.S. market cars like Toyotas are assembled in the United States. So what is the gripe? That people are not choosing to purchase cars that are made up of parts from China under an American imprint?

And if anything Feds are much less likely to pay domestic workers under the table because of clearance issues.

Not sure who you specifically are referring to as saying they are going to end coal but if you mean Obama most current MAGA voted for him as well hence why he won. I know a literal J6-er that voted for Obama.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…

Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.

As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?

Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.

The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.

It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.

I mean what is that based on other than the delusions in your own head? How do you know what the “stereotypical government worker thinks? You’re the one making up the stereotype.

It seems to me that people working for the government would be more likely to have a family member that was a miner or a domestic worker than Peter Thiel or Elon Musk. Or are you saying that since Musk’s dad owned an emerald mine he’s more concerned with the plight of miners?

I guess I’m imagining all those DC feds who proudly mention they would never buy an American car, who pay their domestic workers under the table and voted overwhelmingly for a candidate who promised to put an end to coal.

Now that their own jobs are on the line, they’re having a chance of heart.

I'll take "Things that didn't happen" for $600, Alex! You're a deranged dumbass with a fictional view of the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…

Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.

As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?

Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.

The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.

It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.

I mean what is that based on other than the delusions in your own head? How do you know what the “stereotypical government worker thinks? You’re the one making up the stereotype.

It seems to me that people working for the government would be more likely to have a family member that was a miner or a domestic worker than Peter Thiel or Elon Musk. Or are you saying that since Musk’s dad owned an emerald mine he’s more concerned with the plight of miners?

I guess I’m imagining all those DC feds who proudly mention they would never buy an American car, who pay their domestic workers under the table and voted overwhelmingly for a candidate who promised to put an end to coal.

Now that their own jobs are on the line, they’re having a chance of heart.

That's right--you are imagining it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…

Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.

As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?

You still think mining has a sustainable future? There is a very good reason for job retraining of miners. Do some real research. Ask the owners of the mines.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…

Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.

As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?

Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.

The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.

It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.

I mean what is that based on other than the delusions in your own head? How do you know what the “stereotypical government worker thinks? You’re the one making up the stereotype.

It seems to me that people working for the government would be more likely to have a family member that was a miner or a domestic worker than Peter Thiel or Elon Musk. Or are you saying that since Musk’s dad owned an emerald mine he’s more concerned with the plight of miners?

I guess I’m imagining all those DC feds who proudly mention they would never buy an American car, who pay their domestic workers under the table and voted overwhelmingly for a candidate who promised to put an end to coal.

Now that their own jobs are on the line, they’re having a chance of heart.

Where do you get these ideas? The very last people on the planet who would pay domestic workers under the table would be federal workers (if they can even afford them). Do a little research into 1993 to learn why under the table payments are the 3rd rail in DC. No one who wants to work in government will touch that rail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well this tracks because the GOP doesn’t want a working government.

Statements like this make me realize how dumb people are. They don’t understand what government does. They don’t understand AI and AI’s limits.

Seriously. I just can't anymore. Why aren't people curious enough to do even a little research? Apply just a smidge of critical thinking to the headlines that raise your blood pressure?

[Anonymous]

We won't need domestic servants anymore. We just need good AI with robotics to cook our food, teach our children to read, and help our elderly parents to remember where they put their glasses.