Trump to replace government with AI

[Anonymous]

Well this tracks because the GOP doesn’t want a working government.

Statements like this make me realize how dumb people are. They don’t understand what government does. They don’t understand AI and AI’s limits.

[Anonymous]

AI is really not there yet in terms of applications. A lot of government work is also front facing and robotics is not advancing at the same pace as AI. Also a lot of these projections were based on AI continuing to advance at a constant rate and recent releases have not shown that to be the case. Anyone thinking that AI is capable of doing this within this presidency is a fool.

[Anonymous]

And Kash Valhala just testified (seconds ago) that AI is a huge problem

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…

Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.

As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?

Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:AI is a wet dream of the tech bros.
The data centers use a ton of highly polluting electricity (coal power!).
AI is created by humans and has many, many flaws, as do humans.
I believe those data centers are going to be the next Blockbuster Video stores — largely abandoned warehouses full of old tech — in A decade

Let's not forget all of the water they require to cool. Why are we giving up precious resources in a time of climate change so people can generate stupid memes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…

Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.

As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?

Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.

The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.

It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:AI is a wet dream of the tech bros.
The data centers use a ton of highly polluting electricity (coal power!).
AI is created by humans and has many, many flaws, as do humans.
I believe those data centers are going to be the next Blockbuster Video stores — largely abandoned warehouses full of old tech — in A decade

did ai tell you that

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:AI is not, and will never be the future. It is so baffling to me how MAGA has a severe love addiction to AI and does not even seem to care about the concerns elsewhere it has.

they said that about the car too

[Anonymous]

On the flip side this could enable those in public service to better focus on more impactful and meaningful work while passing on mundane tasks to AI assistants.

It could free up their time to focus on things that a human with empathy can really make a difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most companies want to replace 30% or more of staff with AI. That’s why OpenAI has a $300B slush fund to pour into Oracles coffers.

Who will buy all the junk created by the billionaires?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…

Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.

As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?

Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.

The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.

It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.

That is simply wrong. Most federal employees don’t want jobs leaving the US, certainly didn’t cheer it on, though they may have encouraged miners to code because lung cancer sucks…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…

Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.

As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?

Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.

The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.

It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.

That's just it. Without regulations, the miners are screwed and will end up walking around with oxygen tanks (best case scenario). Trump will just toss a Bible at them and tell them everyone's praying hard for them to get well so they can get back to work.

That is simply wrong. Most federal employees don’t want jobs leaving the US, certainly didn’t cheer it on, though they may have encouraged miners to code because lung cancer sucks…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is inevitable. Probably for the best too…

Probably for the best of your stocks, selfish jerk. And dream on, AI sucks.

As a nation we cheered on sending factories to China, replacing domestic workers with immigrants and told miners to learn to code. But government bureaucrats are the line in the sand?

Working in the public sector has historically been one of the few ways for people to achieve social mobility so maybe it should be a line in the sand.

The point being is that your stereotypical government worker was fine with all those other people being sacrificed on the altar of progress, so now there really isn’t anyone willing to lock arms with them.

It’s really a self-own. They really did think they were some special class immune to consequences.

That is simply wrong. Most federal employees don’t want jobs leaving the US, certainly didn’t cheer it on, though they may have encouraged miners to code because lung cancer sucks…

That's just it. Without regulations, the miners are screwed and will end up walking around with oxygen tanks (best case scenario). Trump will just toss a Bible at them and tell them everyone's praying hard for them to get well so they can get back to work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://oligarchwatch.substack.com/p/the-little-known-think-tank-pushing

"A think tank with ties to right-wing billionaires Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Charles Koch, the Foundation for American Innovation (FAI), is pushing a radical plan to replace large swaths of the federal government with artificial intelligence.

FAI suggests up to 30% of federal workers could be replaced by AI."

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/13/ai-is-opening-a-maga-trump-split-00534925

"Trump’s rush toward AI is exposing an important faultline in the Republican coalition: Many of its voters and leaders deeply mistrust the power of Big Tech, but Trump himself has worked closely with industry CEOs to deliver on their priorities."

How about "AI" as President! AI2025 ! ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well this tracks because the GOP doesn’t want a working government.

Statements like this make me realize how dumb people are. They don’t understand what government does. They don’t understand AI and AI’s limits.

My spouse had to call the IRS 3x this year for an error they had in our records. First person didn’t know how to fix it. Second person saw the record of the case and promised to fix it but didn’t. Third person actually fixed it manually after a 50 minute call.

I shudder to think of an AI dominated world where we have no humans around to fix the records when systems go wrong.