How are magas going to spin it?

[Anonymous]

I think a better question is, how will Democrats spin it when the files are eventually released (and they will be) and there is no implication of Trump’s involvement?

The victims in the interview were already asked if Trump (and Clinton) were involved and they all said no. Are Democrats going to keep pushing their narrative, a la Russiahoax? How about Bidengate, when they insisted Biden was “sharp as a tack” - until his decline finally became too obvious to continue with the gaslighting?

I’d love for the files to be released. And when they are, if Trump is indeed not implicated, all of you calling him a “pedophile” will apologize - right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think a better question is, how will Democrats spin it when the files are eventually released (and they will be) and there is no implication of Trump’s involvement?

The victims in the interview were already asked if Trump (and Clinton) were involved and they all said no. Are Democrats going to keep pushing their narrative, a la Russiahoax? How about Bidengate, when they insisted Biden was “sharp as a tack” - until his decline finally became too obvious to continue with the gaslighting?

I’d love for the files to be released. And when they are, if Trump is indeed not implicated, all of you calling him a “pedophile” will apologize - right?

I think probably we aren’t going to come to any kind of agreement at all if you seriously think that Trump isn’t involved with Russia. That’s quite a bit of denial

Anyway, I doubt that anyone would fully ever believe that Trump is not a part of the child rape and coverup. People will just assume that the evidence had tampered with, and that’s mostly through his own actions and reactions in regards to the release of the files. We already know that they had 1000 FBI agents redacting his information from the files. If it didn’t implicate him, why bother?

It would be a truth so much stranger than fiction that no one would ever buy it. His legacy is as a pedophile and best friend to Epstein.

[Anonymous]

Yeah, Trump has given anyone with eyes and ears SO much evidence about his willingness to lie and tamper with evidence. Remember the boxes in the bathroom? Remember the sharpie on the hurricane map?? Nothing he touches stays pure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think a better question is, how will Democrats spin it when the files are eventually released (and they will be) and there is no implication of Trump’s involvement?

The victims in the interview were already asked if Trump (and Clinton) were involved and they all said no. Are Democrats going to keep pushing their narrative, a la Russiahoax? How about Bidengate, when they insisted Biden was “sharp as a tack” - until his decline finally became too obvious to continue with the gaslighting?

I’d love for the files to be released. And when they are, if Trump is indeed not implicated, all of you calling him a “pedophile” will apologize - right?

If Trump is not implicated in some way, why is he threatening Massie and others?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think a better question is, how will Democrats spin it when the files are eventually released (and they will be) and there is no implication of Trump’s involvement?

The victims in the interview were already asked if Trump (and Clinton) were involved and they all said no. Are Democrats going to keep pushing their narrative, a la Russiahoax? How about Bidengate, when they insisted Biden was “sharp as a tack” - until his decline finally became too obvious to continue with the gaslighting?

I’d love for the files to be released. And when they are, if Trump is indeed not implicated, all of you calling him a “pedophile” will apologize - right?

I think probably we aren’t going to come to any kind of agreement at all if you seriously think that Trump isn’t involved with Russia. That’s quite a bit of denial

Anyway, I doubt that anyone would fully ever believe that Trump is not a part of the child rape and coverup. People will just assume that the evidence had tampered with, and that’s mostly through his own actions and reactions in regards to the release of the files. We already know that they had 1000 FBI agents redacting his information from the files. If it didn’t implicate him, why bother?

It would be a truth so much stranger than fiction that no one would ever buy it. His legacy is as a pedophile and best friend to Epstein.

The fact that you can’t bring yourself to admit that the “Steele dossier” has long been discredited makes anything else you have to say very easy to ignore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict a lot of the usual whataboutism.

Our illustrious leader is doubling down and calling it a "Democrat hoax" again...

https://x.com/BulwarkOnline/status/1963271275511484855

Either he’s lying about its being a hoax or he’s admitting that Democrats outsmarted him because he initially fell for their hoax. A reporter should pin him down and ask whether he was duped in the past or he’s lying now.

The lawyer in today's press conference said Trump helped with their case in 2007, and specifically said in front of the cameras that Trump most definitely didn't cll it a hoax then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think a better question is, how will Democrats spin it when the files are eventually released (and they will be) and there is no implication of Trump’s involvement?

The victims in the interview were already asked if Trump (and Clinton) were involved and they all said no. Are Democrats going to keep pushing their narrative, a la Russiahoax? How about Bidengate, when they insisted Biden was “sharp as a tack” - until his decline finally became too obvious to continue with the gaslighting?

I’d love for the files to be released. And when they are, if Trump is indeed not implicated, all of you calling him a “pedophile” will apologize - right?

Wasn't there already a case about Trump and underaged girls? He knew what Epstein was doing whether he was involved or not. If he wants to drain the swamp, now is the time to do it. This is a massive coverup by both parties, the wealthiest Americans, US banks, and foreign nations. But, he says that for political expediency. He's not the outsider you believe him to be.

[Anonymous]

If Trump isn't mentioned then why did Bondi need ONE THOUSAND DOJ employees to redact trump's name?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Trump isn't mentioned then why did Bondi need ONE THOUSAND DOJ employees to redact trump's name?

Bondi told him his name was in it.

Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files
https://www.wsj.com/politics/justice-department-told-trump-name-in-epstein-files-727a8038

[Anonymous]

You know it’s bad for Trump if MAGA state TV doesn’t cover the topic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think a better question is, how will Democrats spin it when the files are eventually released (and they will be) and there is no implication of Trump’s involvement?

The victims in the interview were already asked if Trump (and Clinton) were involved and they all said no. Are Democrats going to keep pushing their narrative, a la Russiahoax? How about Bidengate, when they insisted Biden was “sharp as a tack” - until his decline finally became too obvious to continue with the gaslighting?

I’d love for the files to be released. And when they are, if Trump is indeed not implicated, all of you calling him a “pedophile” will apologize - right?

Wasn't there already a case about Trump and underaged girls? He knew what Epstein was doing whether he was involved or not. If he wants to drain the swamp, now is the time to do it. This is a massive coverup by both parties, the wealthiest Americans, US banks, and foreign nations. But, he says that for political expediency. He's not the outsider you believe him to be.

Trump was a political outsider in 2016. He's just as much a part of the swamp now as Biden was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think a better question is, how will Democrats spin it when the files are eventually released (and they will be) and there is no implication of Trump’s involvement?

The victims in the interview were already asked if Trump (and Clinton) were involved and they all said no. Are Democrats going to keep pushing their narrative, a la Russiahoax? How about Bidengate, when they insisted Biden was “sharp as a tack” - until his decline finally became too obvious to continue with the gaslighting?

I’d love for the files to be released. And when they are, if Trump is indeed not implicated, all of you calling him a “pedophile” will apologize - right?

DP. Perhaps you missed it, but two of the people leading this issue are REPUBLICANS Massie and MTG. Marjorie in particular has a lot of credibility in MAgA world since she’s been one of their fiercest warriors and she says emphatically it’s not a hoax.

[Anonymous]

Go Marge! Go!!

I may send her a thank you card. And never in a million years would I have thought that I would do that.

[jsteele]

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1259050.page