Better than Forbes at least. |
lol this list is garbage |
so is their "methodology" or lack thereof. incredibly sus. it's partly based on anonymous reviews from parents/students but they don't verify you actually go there so it could just be written by anyone including people who work in admissions at the college!! |
This list is a joke in terms of LAC ratings.
How is Harvey Mudd the top rated LAC lol? Why are W-A-S-P not on the list but Harvey Mudd and CMC are? Obviously their boosters and admission teams have been hard at work! The WASP colleges don't have to try as hard. |
agree and why is this thread getting double posted today?? its just niche's silly rankings which aren't actually legit ... |
Niche is s lousy real estate site. People will believe anything. |
It’s a great list. WASP is overrated, particularly Amherst. Bitter much? |
agree |
So is Forbes. |
I would actually love to see the Poughkeepsie residents views of Vassar. That would be good fun. |
UMCP at 71? Don't know about that..... |
this list gives nouveau riche, techy vibes.
like in what world is mit better than priceton, harvey mudd better than williams, amherst and swarthmore. please ... |
I disagree. Princeton, Williams, Amherst, Swarthmore... they all blend together into one indistinguishable SLAC. And I went to a SLAC, so I'm not biased against them. They're just all the same. |
Huh? Tell me you didn't go to Princeton without telling me you didn't go to Princeton. |
In everyone’s world except yours. |