Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Naviance works well if you have an average child. Not so well if you have a 1570 SAT and you are applying to elites from a competitive school. It honestly feels like a crapshoot
This isn’t true either. Just because the reach or target level is different doesn’t mean Naviance is more accurate at the “average” level. And any school that has less than a 20% acceptance rate is a crapshoot, with or without the gpa and sat data.
NP. This is an important point, that low acceptance rate schools are reaches for all, no matter what your scattergram says. Too often in this forum posters swear by the backward-looking scattergrams to define their reach/match/safety categories and that is inappropriate, in my opinion.