Trump considering compensation for Jan. 6 rioters

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The capitol police should have shot to kill the insurrectionists. Good riddance of bad rubbish!

That was a real mistake right there. They should have been shot instead of herded out.

You know if Democrats violently invaded the Capitol police would be ordered to shoot on sight.

It's time to treat Republicans like they treat everyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This officially makes him insane!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-floats-possibility-compensation-jan-030031988.html

Hmmm make me think he's creating a distraction for something far more sinister. but he's also freaking insane

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The J6'ers deserve compensation, that's a no-brainer, but when will Ashli Babbitt's murderer be brought to justice?

F U MAGA moron! Ashli played stupid games and won a stupid prize.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The J6'ers deserve compensation, that's a no-brainer, but when will Ashli Babbitt's murderer be brought to justice?

She should have obeyed orders. Isn't that what you MAGAs tell black kids when one of them is shot by the police?

This!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he goes down this path, the outcome could be scary. He’s going to make everything boil over and this could cause civil war. This feels like a breaking point

You think there will be civil war over compensating J6 defendants? lmao

That's ridiculous. Nobody cares.

It's part of Russian influencing plans to spur talk of American civil war on various social media fora. It seems to pop up here with regularity and it gives me chills to know they're working on this so diligently while the US/DOGE cut so much of its cybersurveillance on malicious foreign influence.

It doesn't bother me if anyone, whether they be Russian or American or whomever, posts nonsense comments on social media and DCUM. Nobody is having a civil war over J6 defendants receiving compensation from the U.S. Government because nobody cares. It's laughable.

You are laughable and no one cares about your thoughts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The J6'ers deserve compensation, that's a no-brainer, but when will Ashli Babbitt's murderer be brought to justice?

He was REQUIRED by LAW to call out a warning BEFORE killing her. She was an UNARMED woman.

He needs to be investigated and held accountable. However, he got a promotion and a low profile cushy job at the Library of Congress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The J6'ers deserve compensation, that's a no-brainer, but when will Ashli Babbitt's murderer be brought to justice?

He was REQUIRED by LAW to call out a warning BEFORE killing her. She was an UNARMED woman.

He needs to be investigated and held accountable. However, he got a promotion and a low profile cushy job at the Library of Congress.

This guy is supposed to warn thousands of people one at a time to leave the Capitol after they stormed in? Mmmkay. Blame Trump for inciting it. The officer surely has PTSD after being attacked.

[Anonymous]

J6 is basically a modern Boston massacre and Tories hate it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The J6'ers deserve compensation, that's a no-brainer, but when will Ashli Babbitt's murderer be brought to justice?

He was REQUIRED by LAW to call out a warning BEFORE killing her. She was an UNARMED woman.

He needs to be investigated and held accountable. However, he got a promotion and a low profile cushy job at the Library of Congress.

This guy is supposed to warn thousands of people one at a time to leave the Capitol after they stormed in? Mmmkay. Blame Trump for inciting it. The officer surely has PTSD after being attacked.

She was breaking the window to the chambers of congress and the law enforcement officer had a that there was an imminent threat to lives of people inside. There was an entire mob of people behind her that would have come behind her and killed people without appropriate deterrence. This is a textbook example of a justified use of lethal force.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The J6'ers deserve compensation, that's a no-brainer, but when will Ashli Babbitt's murderer be brought to justice?

He was REQUIRED by LAW to call out a warning BEFORE killing her. She was an UNARMED woman.

He needs to be investigated and held accountable. However, he got a promotion and a low profile cushy job at the Library of Congress.

There were numerous warnings and at least one investigation, which found the shooting justified.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The J6'ers deserve compensation, that's a no-brainer, but when will Ashli Babbitt's murderer be brought to justice?

He was REQUIRED by LAW to first issue a warning. He didn’t. Investigate and hold him accountable for unlawful MURDER of an UNARMED female VETERAN.

Nah. Maybe don’t try to break into the House chamber? By the way, she was warned. Multiple times.

Babbitt FA and appropriately FO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The J6'ers deserve compensation, that's a no-brainer, but when will Ashli Babbitt's murderer be brought to justice?

He was REQUIRED by LAW to first issue a warning. He didn’t. Investigate and hold him accountable for unlawful MURDER of an UNARMED female VETERAN.

Nah. Maybe don’t try to break into the House chamber? By the way, she was warned. Multiple times.

Babbitt FA and appropriately FO.

The law requires the cop to issue a warning before he shoots. He failed to obey the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The J6'ers deserve compensation, that's a no-brainer, but when will Ashli Babbitt's murderer be brought to justice?

He was REQUIRED by LAW to first issue a warning. He didn’t. Investigate and hold him accountable for unlawful MURDER of an UNARMED female VETERAN.

Nah. Maybe don’t try to break into the House chamber? By the way, she was warned. Multiple times.

Babbitt FA and appropriately FO.

The law requires the cop to issue a warning before he shoots. He failed to obey the law.

There is no law that requires a law enforcement officer to warn before shooting. There may be an agency policy, but certainly no law.

[Anonymous]

I watched the video. The officer was completely justified.