Tulsi Gabbard confirmed as Director of National Intelligence

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's going to start shutting down intelligence agencies - just watch.

She’s going to get operatives killed.

The IC should be smart enough to circumvent the insider threat that she poses and work around it for the next four (or maybe more) years. They do it all the time as operatives.

Maybe from an institutional perspective, but there's still a lot of damage she can do on her own.

If you're part of the IC, isn't it in your skillset to contain insider threat situations where damage is limited? I would think that is part of the job function. I'm not saying it's easy but I'm also saying that these guys know the threat that she poses so if they can't figure out a way to work around that, then it's on them to deal with the fallout. If the Dems ever get reelected again, her clearance can be immediately revoked. But at this point, that community better start to put protocols in place to understand the damage that she can inflict and make sure they're effectively managing it.

[Anonymous]

Thee is no bottom. There is clearly no low so low that the republicans won’t support it.

If there is any justice left in the world Merrick Garland will die a slow death for what he did to this country by not dealing with the threats for FOUR YEARS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's going to start shutting down intelligence agencies - just watch.

She’s going to get operatives killed.

The IC should be smart enough to circumvent the insider threat that she poses and work around it for the next four (or maybe more) years. They do it all the time as operatives.

Maybe from an institutional perspective, but there's still a lot of damage she can do on her own.

If you're part of the IC, isn't it in your skillset to contain insider threat situations where damage is limited? I would think that is part of the job function. I'm not saying it's easy but I'm also saying that these guys know the threat that she poses so if they can't figure out a way to work around that, then it's on them to deal with the fallout. If the Dems ever get reelected again, her clearance can be immediately revoked. But at this point, that community better start to put protocols in place to understand the damage that she can inflict and make sure they're effectively managing it.

As the DNI she has access to our most sensitive intelligence, whether we like it or not. All she needs to do is start feeding that back to Putin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thee is no bottom. There is clearly no low so low that the republicans won’t support it.

If there is any justice left in the world Merrick Garland will die a slow death for what he did to this country by not dealing with the threats for FOUR YEARS.

All because he didn't want to appear partisan. This administration could care less about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thee is no bottom. There is clearly no low so low that the republicans won’t support it.

If there is any justice left in the world Merrick Garland will die a slow death for what he did to this country by not dealing with the threats for FOUR YEARS.

+100. A pox on them all for not protecting our country and its future.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mitch was the only republican dissenter? God we have no hope.

Mitch is at the end of his life. He’s just a sad figure now. He’s more concerned with fighting against Trump than Democrats.

Mitch had two chances to impeach Trump and he didn't. So this is on him. Maybe he's atoning? He's still going to hell.

That's exactly what I came here to say. Trump is terrible, but Mitch is 100% complicit. And if it all comes down to the Supreme Court and fails, it really all is his fault. He deserves to burn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thee is no bottom. There is clearly no low so low that the republicans won’t support it.

If there is any justice left in the world Merrick Garland will die a slow death for what he did to this country by not dealing with the threats for FOUR YEARS.

+100. A pox on them all for not protecting our country and its future.

Just imagine for a moment that the Biden administration had come in 4 years ago with the same fervor for change and undoing Trump's first term. Imagine where we'd be now. But they didn't. I hate Trump, but I'm also so mad at democrats for sleeping through all the threats. We need a leader of our own that has this kind of drive and passion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And now we have a Russian asset as our Director of National Intelligence. God help us all.

Was just about to write that very sentence. Gabbard, Hegseth, Vance, Trump, and so many more. This is not a joke--it's the culmination of decades of spycraft and a bit of luck. Americans better wake up soon or it's game over.

[Anonymous]

Wouldn't work in any tall towers in the next few years...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For some reason, democrats adore fossils who cannot walk. Republican even.

An elderly, physically frail politician with questionable health both mental and physical? Democrats can’t get enough.

Bonus points for usage of a wheelchair or hoveround.

The more often a politician falls in public, the more democrats love the politician.

Clearly yet another distraction because not on topic. And even in that you should do some research:

https://www.wdsu.com/article/119th-us-congress-new-members-age-race-gender/63327142

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thee is no bottom. There is clearly no low so low that the republicans won’t support it.

If there is any justice left in the world Merrick Garland will die a slow death for what he did to this country by not dealing with the threats for FOUR YEARS.

+100. A pox on them all for not protecting our country and its future.

Just imagine for a moment that the Biden administration had come in 4 years ago with the same fervor for change and undoing Trump's first term. Imagine where we'd be now. But they didn't. I hate Trump, but I'm also so mad at democrats for sleeping through all the threats. We need a leader of our own that has this kind of drive and passion.

It's not "drive and passion." It's greed, corruption, and an insatiable zeal for money and power, with a side of malevolence. I prefer my leaders to be a bit better than that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And now we have a Russian asset as our Director of National Intelligence. God help us all.

She’s been serving in our military for years, doing multiple tours overseas. You’ve done nothing for our country and you have the nerve to question the loyalty of someone who has put their life on the line for this country.

NP here. You don't know who you're talking to and it's possible for loyal people to be turned.

It has happened throughout history.

Bergdahl etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thee is no bottom. There is clearly no low so low that the republicans won’t support it.

If there is any justice left in the world Merrick Garland will die a slow death for what he did to this country by not dealing with the threats for FOUR YEARS.

+100. A pox on them all for not protecting our country and its future.

Just imagine for a moment that the Biden administration had come in 4 years ago with the same fervor for change and undoing Trump's first term. Imagine where we'd be now. But they didn't. I hate Trump, but I'm also so mad at democrats for sleeping through all the threats. We need a leader of our own that has this kind of drive and passion.

The Obama Bros, on their podcast, just said they wished they were more aggressive at streamlining government and they should have taken more of a Trump approach. They said Obama wanted it, but the bureaucracy is hard to fight and they should have pushed harder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And now we have a Russian asset as our Director of National Intelligence. God help us all.

She’s been serving in our military for years, doing multiple tours overseas. You’ve done nothing for our country and you have the nerve to question the loyalty of someone who has put their life on the line for this country.

She is a traitor. One can both serve in the US military and be a traitor to the country.

You’re only saying she’s a traitor because she left the Democratic Party and spoke against it’s insane policies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And now we have a Russian asset as our Director of National Intelligence. God help us all.

She’s been serving in our military for years, doing multiple tours overseas. You’ve done nothing for our country and you have the nerve to question the loyalty of someone who has put their life on the line for this country.

She is a traitor. One can both serve in the US military and be a traitor to the country.

You’re only saying she’s a traitor because she left the Democratic Party and spoke against it’s insane policies.

She spoke out against Trump and his actions against the Assad regime in Syria in 2017. She suggested there was no clear evidence of Assad using chemical weapons against his own people. She has also made a few comments that came across as sympathetic to Russia. For these reasons, she is a traitor.