Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Kim Kardashian Question
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
well they are barking all the way to the bank now, aren't they? |
Anonymous
Really? I think Kim is quite a beauty and the younger one, Kendall I think, is really pretty too. But the one who is married to the athlete (not the one with the baby, the other one) - oh my. I'm sure she is sweet but she does not have a pretty face. At least not like Kim. Not that it matters - not saying she is ugly or unattractive but compared to the beauty of some of her sisters...she is not AS pretty IMO. |
Anonymous
| I think you mean Khloe. No she's not as pretty as Kim, but she's pretty damn far from the dog pound. I don't think I'd rank any of those girls lower than a 9.... maybe an 8.5. |
Anonymous
Really? I think Khloe really stands out as much, much lower. Maybe if I knew her in real life I wouldn't say that and maybe because many celebrity women are prettier than average. But she just does not have "nice features" as my grandma would say. |
Anonymous
| I love this thread. |
Anonymous
| i actually think khloe is quite pretty, she is just not a delicate beauty. her features are bigger. she is much, much taller than her sisters. i think that makes her stand out. |
Anonymous
i agree. when put next to her petite sisters she seems a bit out of place. but she's like a xena amazon. |
Anonymous
They got the ugly genes from the dad and the pretty one from the mom. |