|
*It depends on your disposable income*
What you earn vs what you spend it on. If you are a high earner but spend it all on your elderly parents care or gambling or whatever, then you can't be rich. If you don't earn quite that much, but don't have too many costs, then you could be rich. If you find yourself with retirement taken care of, enough disposable income to cash flow your children's college costs, afford international vacations every year, along with outsourcing daily chores and living a nice life... then you're rich. Total net worth is considered too. Compared to most people, you are rich in assets. But compared to people on DCUM... eh. Upper middle, maybe. |
LOL, 1.8 will not even come close to buying a burnt out, condemned tear down n a tiny lot where I live. It’s less relevant whether you are rich, UMC or mc. What matters economically is whether you live within your means and have financial security. There’s a spectrum of behaviors out there. MIL has several million in invested yet liquid assets, owns 8 different properties which are paid off, low tax basis and rents out. She lives very frugally to the point where you have to be careful not to eat stuff she brings over. She will leave a mayonnaise based salad with chicken in her car for hours during a 90 degree day and overnight yet want us to eat it the next day. She only buys and wears second hand thrift store clothes because ‘Chicos has gone insane with price increases, do they think they are Halston?’ Contrast this with one of her siblings who closed his medical practice 30 years ago and has been into investing ever since. He is always spending and looking for several hundred thousand from his extended family to ‘invest’. |
I think everyone would define a ski house as rich especially if you never rent it out
|
| Op is rich in savings, rich in security and rich in family. It's OK to exhale and enjoy it for a moment. |
Dude shut up |
No sir. $5Mn is rich. You can’t hide that kind of money then cry poverty. |
If you “live near” rich people you are rich by the proximity not the entirety. That’s still rich. |
It’s better to have rich and have lost than to not have rich at all |
| You are upper-middle class with that net worth. |
|
Ultra-high net worth individuals are usually defined as those with $30M+ in net worth. That's probably "rich" by most definitions.
Very high net worth individuals a usually thought of as those whose net worth is between $5M and $30M. It's likely that the lower end of that range would be thought of by some as merely comfortable, while the upper end would be well-to-do. But consider that a high net worth person is usually defined as someone with $1M to $5M in net worth. Such an individual might not be considered "rich" if living in a high cost of living environment among high-earning neighbors. That same person is probably considered "rich" by people with incomes around the national average of around $60K. |
| 1.8m barely buys a two bedroom apartment where I live. You’re rich by Kansas standards, not by SF or NYC standards |
| Yep, just rich enough to talk about the $, not rich enough to retire early or now~so sad! |
| 5 is not rich. That is still well within the range of being able to completely squander your family wealth in a single generation. Tell your kids that you guys are not rich. 5 is nothing, and only 3 of it is in investments. 90k a year in investment income after taxes is not a luxurious lifestyle. |
Not if you hate your job or cannot work full time any longer for whatever reason. Locked up wealth you can't leverage to pay bills, that doesn't produce income you can live on will not feel like wealth or provide the same lifestyle and freedom as wealth that generates income. Most people with equity in their expensive homes and fat 401Ks can have millions but they can't touch it until retirement, so they have to keep working. |
| You live in a 2 million dollar house and are asking this? Yes you are rich. |