Unanimous ruling by SCOTUS

[Anonymous]

There once was a man from New York
Whose campaign was met with a fork
The court said, "No way!
It's Congress's play!"
Now chaos and turmoil are corked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump can stay on the ballot.

Correct decision.

What happened to States Rights that they harped on in their confirmation hearings not to mention giving the individual states the right to ban abortions. May these Nine quivering Quisling-Laval doppelgangers meet the same end as the originals!

There is an idea that if Colorado is allowed to remove a federal candidate from the ballot, that other states would also remove a federal candidate from a ballot with less legitimate reasoning. This ruling prevents that.

Does it mean that a state cannot remove an obviously unqualified candidate, such as a 16 year old Canadian, from the ballot for presidency? If that comes up, we can revisit the question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No brainer decision. I called it as 9-0 repeatedly, happy to be proven right.

The Senate refused to convict him based on the fact that impeachment power is moot after the president is out of office. So I guess there is a huge loophole that makes failed coups unpunishable.

The problem with your logic is that half of the country views January 6th as an insurrection, and half of the country views it as a riot stemming from a suspicion that the election was stolen via mail in ballots, etc.

It’s akin to half of the country viewing abortion as a medical procedure, versus half of the country viewing abortion as infanticide.

The two sides don’t see eye to eye on this, and preventing the man from being president based on one’s sides view will not go over well. Let the people vote — isn’t that democracy after all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This was a no-brainer. But he won't get immmunity.

Yes, he will. Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett are his slavering slaves. And, it would appear that Sotomajor, Kagan, and Brown have joined their party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump can stay on the ballot.

Correct decision.

What happened to States Rights that they harped on in their confirmation hearings not to mention giving the individual states the right to ban abortions. May these Nine quivering Quisling-Laval doppelgangers meet the same end as the originals!

This isn’t a state office. Again. No brainer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was a no-brainer. But he won't get immmunity.

Yes, he will. Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett are his slavering slaves. And, it would appear that Sotomajor, Kagan, and Brown have joined their party.

Or, this case here was so black and white that even Sotomajor, Kagan and Brown couldn’t spin it in Biden’s favor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No brainer decision. I called it as 9-0 repeatedly, happy to be proven right.

The Senate refused to convict him based on the fact that impeachment power is moot after the president is out of office. So I guess there is a huge loophole that makes failed coups unpunishable.

The problem with your logic is that half of the country views January 6th as an insurrection, and half of the country views it as a riot stemming from a suspicion that the election was stolen via mail in ballots, etc.

It’s akin to half of the country viewing abortion as a medical procedure, versus half of the country viewing abortion as infanticide.

The two sides don’t see eye to eye on this, and preventing the man from being president based on one’s sides view will not go over well. Let the people vote — isn’t that democracy after all?

DP. No, majority rules is not how the rule of law works. Even if unpopular, the Constitution controls. Sorry Charlie.

You can start a constitutional convention to five insurrectionists a pass and overturn that part of the Fourteenth Amendment. If you want to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump can stay on the ballot.

Correct decision.

What happened to States Rights that they harped on in their confirmation hearings not to mention giving the individual states the right to ban abortions. May these Nine quivering Quisling-Laval doppelgangers meet the same end as the originals!

There is an idea that if Colorado is allowed to remove a federal candidate from the ballot, that other states would also remove a federal candidate from a ballot with less legitimate reasoning. This ruling prevents that.

Does it mean that a state cannot remove an obviously unqualified candidate, such as a 16 year old Canadian, from the ballot for presidency? If that comes up, we can revisit the question.

We’ll revisit it when Elon wants to run, god help us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This was a no-brainer. But he won't get immmunity.

Why not? He’s stacked the court.

[Anonymous]

R.I.P. Democracy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump can stay on the ballot.

Correct decision.

He can't keep getting away with it!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden needs to understand that the courts are not going to take Trump out of the running.

His effort at Lawfare are not going to work.

Biden is not directing any of this. We have checks and balances.

For now.

In a year, if Trump is president, we won't.

[Anonymous]

We really need to patch these laws that allow insurrectionists like Trump from holding office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden needs to understand that the courts are not going to take Trump out of the running.

His effort at Lawfare are not going to work.

Biden is not directing any of this. We have checks and balances.

Sure. And, pigs fly.

that one case was brought on by a R old lady.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Biden needs to understand that the courts are not going to take Trump out of the running.

His effort at Lawfare are not going to work.

Biden is not directing any of this. We have checks and balances.

Sure. And, pigs fly.

Please explain to us how the office of the president is directing any of this. Please provide facts, not feelings.

Not just this case..... all the phony cases that have been brought against Trump.
I'll start with the GA one. Interesting that the deputy DA in Fulton Co, Jeff DiSantis, reportedly worked with the Biden campaign.
And, then the numerous visits of Nathan Wade to the WH.....

So you have zero facts that this case was directed by the President. Noted.