Girls 2029 club options MOCO

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is the best run club in close proximity to Moco hands down.


Higher MoCo yes. Lower MoCo, no


https://www.usclublax.com/club-rankings/girls?y=2023


lol…it’s the best girls club in the country.

I stopped scrolling past 100. Are BLC or NL even on the list?


Next Level is #113
BLC did not make the list


NL 29 is 18.
Anonymous
Unfortunately the 2029’s are the only good competitive team NL has.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately the 2029’s are the only good competitive team NL has.


Maybe so, but that group of girls is impressive if you live in DC or lower moco!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is the best run club in close proximity to Moco hands down.


Higher MoCo yes. Lower MoCo, no


https://www.usclublax.com/club-rankings/girls?y=2023


lol…it’s the best girls club in the country.

I stopped scrolling past 100. Are BLC or NL even on the list?


Next Level is #113
BLC did not make the list


NL 29 is 18.


That wasn’t the question. NL as an overall girls club was ranked 113.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is the best run club in close proximity to Moco hands down.


Higher MoCo yes. Lower MoCo, no


https://www.usclublax.com/club-rankings/girls?y=2023


lol…it’s the best girls club in the country.

I stopped scrolling past 100. Are BLC or NL even on the list?


Next Level is #113
BLC did not make the list


NL 29 is 18.


That wasn’t the question. NL as an overall girls club was ranked 113.


Apologies, the topic said 29 specifically. My understanding that clubs are stronger in some years than others so as they were asking about 29 I thought it relevant.
Anonymous
people are not understanding that "best club" is great for the ones that go from k-12...thats why Capital isnt there....wake up
Anonymous
NL has a good boys program. Unless you are just starting out, avoid the girls program. They have one decent team at ‘29 and that is it. Super expensive for glorified rec lacrosse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately the 2029’s are the only good competitive team NL has.


Maybe so, but that group of girls is impressive if you live in DC or lower moco!


They’re an ok team that got destroyed in first round of NGLL playoffs last year. Don’t delude yourself. They will never be able to compete with top MD teams.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately the 2029’s are the only good competitive team NL has.


Maybe so, but that group of girls is impressive if you live in DC or lower moco!


They’re an ok team that got destroyed in first round of NGLL playoffs last year. Don’t delude yourself. They will never be able to compete with top MD teams.


Delude myself? Wow. While 18 isn’t top 10, it certainly isn’t bottom of the barrel.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately the 2029’s are the only good competitive team NL has.


Maybe so, but that group of girls is impressive if you live in DC or lower moco!


They’re an ok team that got destroyed in first round of NGLL playoffs last year. Don’t delude yourself. They will never be able to compete with top MD teams.


Delude myself? Wow. While 18 isn’t top 10, it certainly isn’t bottom of the barrel.


They are a good team. But they cannot compete with top MD teams, I agree with PP just not as harshly. Huge difference between top 5 and Top 10 alone.
Anonymous
How was the first weekend of NGLL games for local teams?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Unfortunately the 2029’s are the only good competitive team NL has.


Maybe so, but that group of girls is impressive if you live in DC or lower moco!


They’re an ok team that got destroyed in first round of NGLL playoffs last year. Don’t delude yourself. They will never be able to compete with top MD teams.


Delude myself? Wow. While 18 isn’t top 10, it certainly isn’t bottom of the barrel.


Coaches rely too much on one player. The rest of the team is better than given credit for by the coaches.
Anonymous
Looks like BLC and MCE both lost and NL lost twice. So much for the vaunted 29 NL team. Pride did not play.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Looks like BLC and MCE both lost and NL lost twice. So much for the vaunted 29 NL team. Pride did not play.


They are not vaunted. They are ok with a few really good players.
Anonymous
NL losing to Hero’s White is definitely a surprise. Big validating win for Hero’s.
post reply Forum Index » Lacrosse
Message Quick Reply
Go to: