NL 29 is 18. |
| Unfortunately the 2029’s are the only good competitive team NL has. |
Maybe so, but that group of girls is impressive if you live in DC or lower moco! |
That wasn’t the question. NL as an overall girls club was ranked 113. |
Apologies, the topic said 29 specifically. My understanding that clubs are stronger in some years than others so as they were asking about 29 I thought it relevant. |
| people are not understanding that "best club" is great for the ones that go from k-12...thats why Capital isnt there....wake up |
| NL has a good boys program. Unless you are just starting out, avoid the girls program. They have one decent team at ‘29 and that is it. Super expensive for glorified rec lacrosse. |
They’re an ok team that got destroyed in first round of NGLL playoffs last year. Don’t delude yourself. They will never be able to compete with top MD teams. |
Delude myself? Wow. While 18 isn’t top 10, it certainly isn’t bottom of the barrel. |
They are a good team. But they cannot compete with top MD teams, I agree with PP just not as harshly. Huge difference between top 5 and Top 10 alone. |
| How was the first weekend of NGLL games for local teams? |
Coaches rely too much on one player. The rest of the team is better than given credit for by the coaches. |
| Looks like BLC and MCE both lost and NL lost twice. So much for the vaunted 29 NL team. Pride did not play. |
They are not vaunted. They are ok with a few really good players. |
| NL losing to Hero’s White is definitely a surprise. Big validating win for Hero’s. |